27-Apr-2024 02:50 GMT.
UNDER CONSTRUCTION
[News] New ArticleANN.lu
Posted on 03-Nov-2002 08:17 GMT by RedImpact27 comments
View flat
View list
Article on Suite101.com. http://www.suite101.com/article.cfm/1365/96122
List of all comments to this article
Sorted by date, most recent at bottom
Comment 1Digby03-Nov-2002 07:24 GMT
Comment 2SlimJim03-Nov-2002 08:24 GMT
Comment 3Anonymous03-Nov-2002 11:13 GMT
Comment 4Mike Bouma03-Nov-2002 11:15 GMT
Comment 5Anonymous03-Nov-2002 12:58 GMT
Comment 6Anonymous03-Nov-2002 13:05 GMT
Comment 7Digby03-Nov-2002 13:38 GMT
Comment 8Adam Kowalczyk03-Nov-2002 14:31 GMT
Comment 9Mike Bouma03-Nov-2002 14:46 GMT
Comment 10Lando03-Nov-2002 15:12 GMT
Comment 11alan buxey03-Nov-2002 15:53 GMT
Comment 12amigammc03-Nov-2002 15:54 GMT
New Article : Comment 13 of 27ANN.lu
Posted by Anonymous on 03-Nov-2002 16:32 GMT
In reply to Comment 10 (Lando):
>A nice report, although obviously a bit biased towards MOS. I think
>this should be made clear at the start of the report so people are aware.
What? Biased towards MOS when MOS was only covered in the beginning by stating that they had the most impressive stand (and they did! as they have in so many other shows lately). That is not bias. That is a fact. The MOS stand made Amiga look like an amateur show.
The article then went on to discuss the current progress made by Eyetech and Hyperion and Amiga Inc.'s deal. It was even pretty optimistic in this regard. How on earth can that be biased towards MOS?
Or did I misunderstand? Did you mean the bias was against MOS? If so, one could certainly make the observation that given the size of MOS presence they might have deserved more space in the article as well, but that is obviously more of a matter or opinion and well within author's discression.
Thank you for the article, I enjoyed it.
Jump...
#24 Lando
TopPrevious commentNext commentbottom
List of all comments to this article (continued)
Comment 14StAn03-Nov-2002 17:24 GMT
Comment 15Alan Anthony03-Nov-2002 18:52 GMT
Comment 16SlimJim03-Nov-2002 19:05 GMT
Comment 17Ferry03-Nov-2002 20:52 GMT
Comment 18strobe03-Nov-2002 21:14 GMT
Comment 19SlimJim04-Nov-2002 01:51 GMT
Comment 20Nicolas Mendoza04-Nov-2002 07:59 GMT
Comment 21Rodney McDonell04-Nov-2002 09:19 GMT
Comment 22Ben Hermans/Hyperion04-Nov-2002 09:21 GMT
Comment 23alan buxey04-Nov-2002 09:49 GMT
Comment 24Lando04-Nov-2002 10:05 GMT
Comment 25priest04-Nov-2002 18:09 GMT
Comment 26strobe04-Nov-2002 23:37 GMT
Comment 27Anonymous04-Nov-2002 23:51 GMT
Back to Top