26-Apr-2024 18:37 GMT.
UNDER CONSTRUCTION
[News] OS4 kernel boot logsANN.lu
Posted on 05-Nov-2002 18:11 GMT by Lewis Mistreated88 comments
View flat
View list
Amigart has put online an excerpt from a log of the ExecSG Kernel booting on both the AmigaOne G3 and G4.
Just click here to take a look at it. Amigart has got a snapshot of the output log during the boot on a monitor, too.
List of all comments to this article
Sorted by date, most recent at bottom
Comment 1cOrpse05-Nov-2002 18:02 GMT
Comment 2SlimJim05-Nov-2002 18:04 GMT
Comment 3Ben Hermans/Hyperion05-Nov-2002 18:14 GMT
Comment 4cOrpse05-Nov-2002 18:16 GMT
Comment 5priest05-Nov-2002 18:24 GMT
Comment 6priest05-Nov-2002 18:26 GMT
Comment 7Remco Komduur05-Nov-2002 18:36 GMT
Comment 8Lando05-Nov-2002 18:51 GMT
Comment 9cOrpse05-Nov-2002 18:52 GMT
Comment 10Don Cox05-Nov-2002 19:00 GMT
Comment 11Sam Smith05-Nov-2002 19:08 GMT
Comment 12Cucug05-Nov-2002 19:10 GMT
Comment 13cOrpse05-Nov-2002 19:13 GMT
Comment 14Ben Hermans/Hyperion05-Nov-2002 19:14 GMT
Comment 15SlimJim05-Nov-2002 19:25 GMT
Comment 16Anonymous05-Nov-2002 19:26 GMT
Comment 17José05-Nov-2002 19:31 GMT
Comment 18SlimJim05-Nov-2002 19:34 GMT
Comment 19SlimJim05-Nov-2002 19:35 GMT
Comment 20- ZIP -05-Nov-2002 19:37 GMT
Comment 21DaveW05-Nov-2002 19:45 GMT
Comment 22John Smith05-Nov-2002 19:47 GMT
Comment 23Cucug05-Nov-2002 19:48 GMT
Comment 24DaveW05-Nov-2002 19:50 GMT
Comment 25DaveW05-Nov-2002 19:52 GMT
Comment 26reflect05-Nov-2002 19:53 GMT
Comment 27cOrpse05-Nov-2002 20:02 GMT
Comment 28Charlie05-Nov-2002 21:55 GMT
Comment 29Anonymous05-Nov-2002 22:29 GMT
Comment 30Sam Smith05-Nov-2002 22:43 GMT
Comment 31Henning Nielsen Lund [Denmark]05-Nov-2002 23:09 GMT
Comment 32Anonymous05-Nov-2002 23:19 GMT
Comment 33Anonymous05-Nov-2002 23:23 GMT
Comment 34Henning Nielsen Lund [Denmark]05-Nov-2002 23:33 GMT
Comment 35KenH05-Nov-2002 23:34 GMT
Comment 36Martin Wollert05-Nov-2002 23:35 GMT
Comment 37Henning Nielsen Lund [Denmark]05-Nov-2002 23:36 GMT
Comment 38Henning Nielsen Lund [Denmark]05-Nov-2002 23:42 GMT
Comment 39ehaines05-Nov-2002 23:42 GMT
Comment 40Anonymous06-Nov-2002 00:05 GMT
Comment 41Henning Nielsen Lund [Denmark]06-Nov-2002 00:24 GMT
Comment 42SlimJim06-Nov-2002 01:52 GMT
Comment 43SlimJim06-Nov-2002 01:56 GMT
Comment 44Anonymous06-Nov-2002 02:02 GMT
Comment 45Henning Nielsen Lund [Denmark]06-Nov-2002 02:41 GMT
Comment 46DaveW06-Nov-2002 04:54 GMT
Comment 47DaveW06-Nov-2002 05:02 GMT
Comment 48david06-Nov-2002 05:27 GMT
Comment 49DaveW06-Nov-2002 05:31 GMT
Comment 50SlimJim06-Nov-2002 06:56 GMT
Comment 51Anonymous06-Nov-2002 07:00 GMT
Comment 52SimplePPC06-Nov-2002 07:02 GMT
Comment 53Jon06-Nov-2002 07:43 GMT
Comment 54Jon06-Nov-2002 07:48 GMT
Comment 55Ole-Egil06-Nov-2002 07:53 GMT
Comment 56Jon06-Nov-2002 08:10 GMT
Comment 57EmGee06-Nov-2002 08:18 GMT
Comment 58NeRP06-Nov-2002 08:22 GMT
OS4 kernel boot logs : Comment 59 of 88ANN.lu
Posted by Anonymous on 06-Nov-2002 08:38 GMT
In reply to Comment 46 (DaveW):
>Yeah but you and a few others did come onto here with the specific purpose
>in mind of doing Thendic/BPlans work for them and spread a little Fear,
>Uncertainty and Doubt about AmigaOS4, evidenced by the content that you
>posted.
Comment 44 was my first and only post in this thread prior to this one. I accept that my personal decision to remain anonymous may have added to the confusion, so no problem. But please know this.
My point? Please be careful when making accusations. I have no agenda or interest in spreading FUD or anything false for that matter. I was CORRECTING Henning when he was doing so.
>In order to attract people to your "community" of MorphOS users you are
>better of appearing as helpful and constructive as possible at all times.
Also know that I am not in any MorphOS community, I do not run or own MorphOS or have used it if you do not count trying at a show for two or so minutes. I don't even intend to run MorphOS any time in the future.
But what I don't appreciate is misinformation spread about a product people have worked so hard on. I don't for OS4 either. I don't claim to be able to rebutt all comments that are made, but the one Henning made was simply so wrong in my opinion it warranted response.
And Henning:
>When Anonymous (217.82.98.214) wrote that MorphOS is out there, then it
>sounds like it's for sale --> Finished ... But it is not ready.
Yes, MorphOS is out there since it IS for sale. For those who wish to beta test it. Saying it isn't out there is an outright lie, I'm sorry.
>Just like AmigaOS.
No, not just like AmigaOS. You can not buy it, download it or even fully use it (well, Hyperion may have integrated it in their lab by now but not much outside). And a MorphOS early version has also been available for a long time now for download, which has also attracted some developers.
Please re-read the original post. It stated that MorphOS felt more interesting to that particular chap since it is available and because it is and has been available for quite some time now (for download over a year, for sale first under NDA a few months and now without NDA) it has attracted more software than AmigaOS 4 for which little if any exists since it is NOT available.
That is no FUD. That is a fact. If you don't like the fact that MorphOS has more software than OS4 (by that I mean more native software) then that's just too bad. But that is usually the way it goes when the other is available and has been for a while, and the other is not.
Going on and on about MorphOS not being finished does nothing to change the fact that it is and has been far more accessible and available, and certainly out there, than AmigaOS 4 which is still under crucial development and not ready for such public outing.
Neither are ready, that I do grant you, but given the fact that I can go and buy MorphOS (without an NDA no less) and I can't do the same for OS4 (with or without an NDA) really makes my point.
And that is my only point. The comment that MorphOS "is not out there" was false. It is wrong. I don't mean any disrespect towards Hyperion and I appreciate their work as much as the next person, but please, you are doing nobody any good by twisting words to make the reality into something other than it is.
Jump...
TopPrevious commentNext commentbottom
List of all comments to this article (continued)
Comment 60Anonymous06-Nov-2002 08:43 GMT
Comment 61Mirror06-Nov-2002 08:56 GMT
Comment 62Ben Hermans/Hyperion06-Nov-2002 09:14 GMT
Comment 63Ben Hermans/Hyperion06-Nov-2002 09:16 GMT
Comment 64Ben Hermans/Hyperion06-Nov-2002 09:20 GMT
Comment 65Ben Hermans/Hyperion06-Nov-2002 09:24 GMT
Comment 66Ben Hermans/Hyperion06-Nov-2002 09:29 GMT
Comment 67DaveW06-Nov-2002 09:43 GMT
Comment 68DaveW06-Nov-2002 09:45 GMT
Comment 69Ben Hermans/Hyperion06-Nov-2002 09:58 GMT
Comment 70DaveW06-Nov-2002 11:17 GMT
Comment 710xdeadbeef06-Nov-2002 11:35 GMT
Comment 72Anonymous06-Nov-2002 12:10 GMT
Comment 73sammy06-Nov-2002 12:30 GMT
Comment 74Charlie06-Nov-2002 12:50 GMT
Comment 75Ben Hermans/Hyperion06-Nov-2002 13:02 GMT
Comment 76Anonymous06-Nov-2002 13:29 GMT
Comment 770xdeadbeef06-Nov-2002 13:39 GMT
Comment 78DaveW06-Nov-2002 14:52 GMT
Comment 79sammy06-Nov-2002 15:36 GMT
Comment 80Lennart Fridén06-Nov-2002 16:03 GMT
Comment 81SlimJim06-Nov-2002 17:21 GMT
Comment 82alan buxey06-Nov-2002 17:36 GMT
Comment 83Linus G06-Nov-2002 17:37 GMT
Comment 84SlimJim06-Nov-2002 17:44 GMT
Comment 85SlimJim06-Nov-2002 17:58 GMT
Comment 86Ben Hermans/Hyperion06-Nov-2002 18:11 GMT
Comment 87derf06-Nov-2002 18:19 GMT
Comment 88DaveW06-Nov-2002 18:25 GMT
Back to Top