27-Apr-2024 03:46 GMT.
UNDER CONSTRUCTION
[Web] End of GRex petitionANN.lu
Posted on 25-Jan-2003 16:21 GMT by Alkemyst (Edited on 2003-01-26 15:05:22 GMT by Teemu I. Yliselä)25 comments
View flat
View list
http://www.trimaweb.de/petition/ M. Lück wrote: "Today is the end of the GRex-petition. Until today 296 users have subscribed. TriMa and me want to thank you for your support. Unfortunately this petition has failed. I want to explain in the following lines why it is so.

Two weeks after the start of the petition I have sent the first list with all signatures (without email addresses) to DCE per email. I got an answer of DCE at once. DCE wrote that they would be glad about a support of OS4 and that they are interested in the current discussion.

We got the information of Steffen Häuser that the cybpci.library written by Ralph 'Laire' Schmidt will not work in the 68k emulation because of the 68k MMU setup. So the petition still became more important because presently GRex users have no chance of getting AmigaOS 4.0 started. We got all information per email which Hyperion needs to support the GRex. Four addresses are needed:

the base of GRex I/O address
the interrupt acknowledge address
the base address of config space mappings
the PCI-config and PCI-data address.

No circuit diagramm, hardware or software documents are needed. These information I sent DCE per email. I have not got any response until today. Then we got the information that bplan has the hardware rights. This means DCE has only a licence for the GRex. If this is true or not we do not know. One week ago I contacted Mr. Carda per email for getting clearness. But I also have not got any response until now. That is a pity.

Now we hope that we can attract attention by posting this article. Thank you very much again to all participants... The attempt of moving something forward means so much to us - also if it may fail."
List of all comments to this article
Sorted by date, most recent at bottom
Comment 1José25-Jan-2003 15:48 GMT
Comment 2takemehomegrandma25-Jan-2003 16:53 GMT
Comment 3Anonymous25-Jan-2003 16:55 GMT
Comment 4Darth X25-Jan-2003 17:22 GMT
Comment 5Alkemyst25-Jan-2003 17:41 GMT
Comment 6bbk25-Jan-2003 19:33 GMT
Comment 7bbrv25-Jan-2003 21:18 GMT
Comment 8Kronos25-Jan-2003 21:40 GMT
Comment 9bbk25-Jan-2003 21:45 GMT
Comment 10bbrv25-Jan-2003 21:54 GMT
Comment 11bbk25-Jan-2003 22:06 GMT
Comment 12Raffaele25-Jan-2003 22:47 GMT
Comment 13Christoph Gutjahr25-Jan-2003 22:50 GMT
Comment 14Raffaele25-Jan-2003 22:51 GMT
Comment 15Alkemyst25-Jan-2003 22:57 GMT
Comment 16Troels Ersking25-Jan-2003 23:17 GMT
Comment 17Anonymous25-Jan-2003 23:34 GMT
Comment 18Troels Ersking25-Jan-2003 23:59 GMT
Comment 19bbrv26-Jan-2003 11:44 GMT
Comment 20samface27-Jan-2003 01:23 GMT
Comment 21Christophe Decanini27-Jan-2003 02:28 GMT
Comment 22samface27-Jan-2003 15:55 GMT
Comment 23Anonymous28-Jan-2003 04:36 GMT
Comment 24Anonymous28-Jan-2003 04:40 GMT
Comment 25Alkis Tsapanidis30-Jan-2003 13:22 GMT
Back to Top