26-Apr-2024 20:37 GMT.
UNDER CONSTRUCTION
[Rant] Forum: Amiga's new office address and phone numbersANN.lu
Posted on 28-Feb-2003 12:06 GMT by Holy Cow27 comments
View flat
View list
Where are they? They were promised x months ago .. What I heard elsewhere: McEven is the only "employee" by now and operates the "company" from his livingroom .. however, this may as well be evil fud spread by evil people. I doubt so, though.

My (fun!!) guess: The sholy cow kidnapped the entire team and brought them to the new and top-secret Afghanistan offices of the huuuuuge Zervinsci company (the one starting with Merl..). They are now forced to build their latest high-tech computers, designed in cooperation with Mr. Bush and his old friend Saddam. A press release of this success story to appear soon in Forbes magazine! :) .. of course this is (partly) absurd .. ROTFL ..

The truth? Nobody knows. Do you? Enlighten us!

List of all comments to this article
Sorted by date, most recent at bottom
Comment 1reflect28-Feb-2003 11:14 GMT
Comment 2Mr. Brot28-Feb-2003 11:15 GMT
Comment 3reflect28-Feb-2003 11:43 GMT
Comment 4Mr. Brot28-Feb-2003 12:16 GMT
Comment 5Sam Smith28-Feb-2003 12:32 GMT
Comment 6priest28-Feb-2003 13:12 GMT
Comment 7Dr. Brot28-Feb-2003 15:11 GMT
Comment 8MonkeyOS28-Feb-2003 15:13 GMT
Comment 9Atheist228-Feb-2003 15:26 GMT
Comment 10JoannaK28-Feb-2003 15:43 GMT
Comment 11Anonymous28-Feb-2003 16:04 GMT
Comment 12Leo28-Feb-2003 17:17 GMT
Comment 13priest28-Feb-2003 20:28 GMT
Comment 14SlimJim28-Feb-2003 21:01 GMT
Comment 15Anonymous28-Feb-2003 21:23 GMT
Comment 16Sam Smith28-Feb-2003 22:31 GMT
Comment 17Anonymous01-Mar-2003 00:39 GMT
Comment 18anencephalic_crackpot, digging the archives as usu01-Mar-2003 01:14 GMT
Comment 19JoannaK01-Mar-2003 01:16 GMT
Comment 20Atheist201-Mar-2003 09:50 GMT
Comment 21Anonymous01-Mar-2003 10:31 GMT
Forum: Amiga's new office address and phone numbers : Comment 22 of 27ANN.lu
Posted by Janne Sirén on 01-Mar-2003 10:31 GMT
In reply to Comment 14 (SlimJim):
>I could say that this is not a rant - it adds no opinion, no new insight, not
even a new take on a sad sitution.

And there goes another attempt to discuss whether this is that or that.

Why not discuss the content of the post instead?

I'm sure we have better things to do then analyze all day which posting is news, which is rant, which is "forum" or whatever.

It is the content that matters, after all.

As to the content of this posting, I must say I am surprised about this pro-longed situation. It doensn't make them look good. At least acknowledgning the problems in public and telling everybody that we are now using just this P.O.Box would in my opinion buy them some small-company-credibility.

There are lots of respectable small companies doing that after all. But the respectable ones don't usually try to hide it, which makes this look more suspect in my opinion. It makes them look bad and it really doesn't need to - just a bit of openness and honesty to make it better. Just a suggestion.
Jump...
TopPrevious commentNext commentbottom
List of all comments to this article (continued)
Comment 233seas01-Mar-2003 12:16 GMT
Comment 24Anonymous01-Mar-2003 14:54 GMT
Comment 25Ray A. Akey02-Mar-2003 00:50 GMT
Comment 26Ray A. Akey02-Mar-2003 00:51 GMT
Comment 27Nate Downes02-Mar-2003 03:05 GMT
Back to Top