26-Apr-2024 08:41 GMT.
UNDER CONSTRUCTION
[Motd] Comment moderationANN.lu
Posted on 10-Mar-2003 21:04 GMT by Christian Kemp52 comments
View flat
View list
This is just a friendly reminder to all regulars of the comments section that profanity, personal insults and postings that otherwise violate ANN's guidelines can and will be deleted. Today, I implemented code to allow Christope and Teemu to moderate comments, which should ensure stricter enforcement of the posting guidelines and eliminate some of the noise.

I'm also working on a "trusted user" system, that would allow regular visitors to authenticate with me and have their name or nickname reserved. This will be optional. Since this is still work-in-prgress, comments on this subject are most welcome - especially on how the authentication could work.

List of all comments to this article
Sorted by date, most recent at bottom
Comment 1dammy10-Mar-2003 20:07 GMT
Comment 2Abuse10-Mar-2003 20:09 GMT
Comment 3Teemu I. Yliselä10-Mar-2003 20:12 GMT
Comment 4[JC]10-Mar-2003 20:19 GMT
Comment 5[JC]10-Mar-2003 20:20 GMT
Comment 6Jerry Lewis10-Mar-2003 20:23 GMT
Comment 7Christian KempRegistered user10-Mar-2003 20:23 GMT
Comment 8redrumloa10-Mar-2003 20:25 GMT
Comment 9Christian KempRegistered user10-Mar-2003 20:31 GMT
Comment 10Severin10-Mar-2003 20:38 GMT
Comment 11Hooligan/DCS10-Mar-2003 20:41 GMT
Comment 12Christian KempRegistered user10-Mar-2003 20:44 GMT
Comment 13Christian KempRegistered user10-Mar-2003 20:57 GMT
Comment 14Jerry Lewis10-Mar-2003 21:13 GMT
Comment 15koan10-Mar-2003 21:22 GMT
Comment 16koan10-Mar-2003 21:24 GMT
Comment 17Lasse Bodilsen10-Mar-2003 21:40 GMT
Comment 18takemehomegrandma10-Mar-2003 21:55 GMT
Comment 19takemehomegrandma10-Mar-2003 22:12 GMT
Comment 20takemehomegrandma10-Mar-2003 22:45 GMT
Comment 21Johnny Ray10-Mar-2003 23:47 GMT
Comment 22anonymous11-Mar-2003 01:22 GMT
Comment 23[JC]11-Mar-2003 02:06 GMT
Comment 24strobe11-Mar-2003 03:26 GMT
Comment 25Don Cox11-Mar-2003 07:09 GMT
Comment 26takemehomegrandma11-Mar-2003 08:13 GMT
Comment 27rez11-Mar-2003 09:39 GMT
Comment 28priest11-Mar-2003 12:44 GMT
Comment 29alan buxey11-Mar-2003 12:55 GMT
Comment 30itix11-Mar-2003 13:00 GMT
Comment 31takemehomegrandma11-Mar-2003 13:15 GMT
Comment 32kjetil11-Mar-2003 13:28 GMT
Comment 33Alfred Schwarz11-Mar-2003 14:20 GMT
Comment 34Gregg11-Mar-2003 14:35 GMT
Comment 35takemehomegrandma11-Mar-2003 14:38 GMT
Comment 36Christian KempRegistered user11-Mar-2003 14:50 GMT
Comment 37A user11-Mar-2003 15:00 GMT
Comment 38takemehomegrandma11-Mar-2003 15:01 GMT
Comment 39Trizt11-Mar-2003 15:31 GMT
Comment moderation : Comment 40 of 52ANN.lu
Posted by MarkTime on 11-Mar-2003 17:08 GMT
In reply to Comment 39 (Trizt):
@trizzT,

I'm sorry trizzT, but this line of thinking gets old and no one ever seems to back it up with facts...

what 'we've become'...the 'sad state of affairs'..., such comments that are made sometimes, are just not true. This isn't a change, things are not worse. This is how things have always been, I've been on the internet since before the WWW,...well before the internet we had the online services... since the days of The Source and Compuserve, and BITNET.....

This is how it has always been, and believe me, censorship has been tried over and over again as well.

I've never seen a censored site, that a)censored so well no one's itty bitty little feelings never got hurt.....and b) that didn't create such a scandal around the activities of the censor that the content was still central. In otherwords, AmigaWorld.Net will not be about the amiga soon, but how effective the censors are...

and guess what, they won't learn any kind of lesson...it will fail, but they will come away believing...BUT IT WOULD HAVE WORKED...IT ALMOST WORKED...BUT (USERTHIS or USERTHAT) just came along and messed it all up...(a user clever enough to have strong opinions without ever flaming).

What you find out, quickly, is people can get upset VERY upset, without a person ever doing anything that falls into the definition of 'flaming'....(whatever definition they choose...believe me, it doesn't matter, 1000's of definitions have beent tested)

Welcome to soap opera ville. There will be a short honeymoon period, and then AmigaWorld.Net will be exactly like all the other sites...i.e. despite everything they are an open site, and just like Amiga.org was eventually not so pro-amiga...soon morphos people will have their influence at the new site, and they will not be so pro-amiga, OR, they will be a festering hive of controversy over bouncing people 'unfairly'....and they will turn on themselves, wait....

No one ever believes me in foresight...WAIT...

you'll see, everyone will see.

CKEMP, hold firm to 'OPEN' and 'FREE'...yes, people can complain about the
flamers...but don't ever think that there is a complaint free solution.

AmigaWorld.NET will be besieged in a sea of complaints...because they
are advertising themselves as 'flame free' and therefore a paradise for
the exact type of people who do most all of the complaining....
Jump...
#41 Alkis Tsapanidis #42 Don Cox #48 Trizt
TopPrevious commentNext commentbottom
List of all comments to this article (continued)
Comment 41Alkis Tsapanidis11-Mar-2003 18:07 GMT
Comment 42Don Cox11-Mar-2003 19:27 GMT
Comment 43INSULT!!11-Mar-2003 20:19 GMT
Comment 44MarkTime11-Mar-2003 20:39 GMT
Comment 45Anonymous11-Mar-2003 21:05 GMT
Comment 46Solar12-Mar-2003 08:22 GMT
Comment 47Kjetil12-Mar-2003 11:31 GMT
Comment 48Trizt12-Mar-2003 16:34 GMT
Comment 49Darrin12-Mar-2003 21:07 GMT
Comment 50Nate Downes14-Mar-2003 03:51 GMT
Comment 51Solar14-Mar-2003 09:30 GMT
Comment 52SlimJim14-Mar-2003 10:03 GMT
Back to Top