26-Apr-2024 18:01 GMT.
UNDER CONSTRUCTION
[Web] Fleecy talks again (but not about lawsuits)ANN.lu
Posted on 19-May-2003 03:07 GMT by Raffaele37 comments
View flat
View list
Fleecy Moss "Answers Week nr. 10" is available on :AmigaWorld. Remarkable points are: «Bill McEwen is still CEO.» and «I have no comments to make about any on going lawsuits.» Hum, seems that Fleecy is "appealing to the fifth amendement".
(well, he has got his fully rights to do so)

Quoting:
-----------
4) Tigger: Where you unaware of what Bill McEwen was going to say in the Bolten Peck case about not being the CEO, or were you intentionally misleading the Amiga Community with your post that Bill McEwen was still the CEO??

Fleecy: Bill McEwen is still CEO. He was CEO before I posted that statement, he was the CEO when I posted that statement and is the CEO today as I type this answer to you. I have no comments to make about any on going lawsuits.

------
End Quoting

Take your own conclusions from these statements...

Bye,

Raffaele
List of all comments to this article
Sorted by date, most recent at bottom
Comment 1Mike BoumaRegistered user19-May-2003 03:13 GMT
Comment 2Nicolas Mendoza19-May-2003 03:26 GMT
Comment 3tronman19-May-2003 04:06 GMT
Comment 4T_Bone19-May-2003 04:47 GMT
Comment 5Anonymous19-May-2003 05:37 GMT
Comment 6Kjetil19-May-2003 05:42 GMT
Comment 7Darrin19-May-2003 05:51 GMT
Comment 8T_Bone19-May-2003 05:58 GMT
Comment 9koan19-May-2003 06:11 GMT
Comment 10T_Bone19-May-2003 06:15 GMT
Comment 11Don CoxRegistered user19-May-2003 07:02 GMT
Comment 12Neko19-May-2003 07:54 GMT
Comment 13Stefan Denis19-May-2003 08:05 GMT
Comment 14Olegil19-May-2003 08:24 GMT
Comment 15samface19-May-2003 09:00 GMT
Comment 16Anonymous19-May-2003 09:15 GMT
Comment 17Abuse19-May-2003 09:17 GMT
Comment 18Ian Shurmer19-May-2003 09:51 GMT
Comment 19Lando19-May-2003 10:28 GMT
Comment 20Raffaele19-May-2003 11:01 GMT
Comment 21samface19-May-2003 11:02 GMT
Comment 22Emeric SH19-May-2003 11:15 GMT
Comment 23gz19-May-2003 11:29 GMT
Comment 24samface19-May-2003 11:56 GMT
Comment 25MarkTime19-May-2003 15:22 GMT
Comment 26MarkTime19-May-2003 15:24 GMT
Comment 273seas19-May-2003 15:34 GMT
Comment 28Lando19-May-2003 15:35 GMT
Comment 29Anonymous19-May-2003 15:54 GMT
Comment 30Anders19-May-2003 20:01 GMT
Comment 31Tigger20-May-2003 02:35 GMT
Comment 32Ketzer20-May-2003 06:19 GMT
Comment 33samface20-May-2003 08:19 GMT
Comment 34Tigger21-May-2003 03:39 GMT
Comment 35samface21-May-2003 12:50 GMT
Comment 36Tigger21-May-2003 18:33 GMT
Fleecy talks again (but not about lawsuits) : Comment 37 of 37ANN.lu
Posted by samface on 23-May-2003 12:02 GMT
In reply to Comment 36 (Tigger):
1. Where is the proof of Bill McEwan saying this in court? No, the mere words in an internet based forum such as ANN.lu from someone that claims to be Bolton Peck (for the sake of not assuming anything) is not proof. AFAIK, it could just as well be Bill Buck, spoofing as Bolton, saying this for slinging yet another handfull of mud at the competition. Public knowledge? No, it's a public rumour yet to be verified. Get it verified with actual, solid proof and I might reconsider.

2. I do NOT know Fleecy in person. My comments has no other influence besides my own, period. Claiming otherwise would be rather ignorant since noone could possibly know this better than me.

3. What I believe is really not the point here. I'm trying to bring some form of objectivity in all this rather than stating Yet Another Theory(TM). By objectivity I mean restrain one self from jumping into conclusions and stick to the facts. So far, you have no facts what so ever to back your theories up with, period.
Jump...
TopPrevious commentbottom
Back to Top