27-Apr-2024 16:17 GMT.		 UNDER CONSTRUCTION
[News] Articia IANN.lu
Posted on 01-Jan-2004 20:24 GMT by ID4 - tHe SuRvIvOr -73 comments
View flat
View list
AGPx8, DDR2, MPEG4 ..... Are some of the new Articia I chipset features!!! Link here AGPx8, DDR2, MPEG4 ..... Are some of the new Articia I chipset features!!! Link here
List of all comments to this article
Sorted by date, most recent at bottom
Comment 1Burnt Muller01-Jan-2004 19:33 GMT
Comment 2Anonymous01-Jan-2004 19:40 GMT
Comment 3marcik01-Jan-2004 20:27 GMT
Comment 4Eva01-Jan-2004 21:39 GMT
Comment 5Anonymous01-Jan-2004 21:48 GMT
Comment 6James Carroll01-Jan-2004 22:44 GMT
Comment 7Anon01-Jan-2004 23:10 GMT
Comment 8BrianK01-Jan-2004 23:30 GMT
Comment 9James Carroll02-Jan-2004 00:05 GMT
Comment 10hammer02-Jan-2004 01:16 GMT
Comment 11hammer02-Jan-2004 01:25 GMT
Comment 12JoannaK02-Jan-2004 02:34 GMT
Comment 13BrianK02-Jan-2004 03:24 GMT
Comment 14BrianK02-Jan-2004 03:53 GMT
Comment 15smp26602-Jan-2004 04:04 GMT
Comment 16BrianK02-Jan-2004 04:05 GMT
Comment 17James Carroll02-Jan-2004 04:23 GMT
Comment 18Anonymous02-Jan-2004 07:39 GMT
Comment 19Fred02-Jan-2004 08:05 GMT
Comment 20Eric_Z02-Jan-2004 10:11 GMT
Comment 21Alex Klauke02-Jan-2004 10:19 GMT
Comment 22Alex Klauke02-Jan-2004 10:44 GMT
Comment 23Johan Rönnblom02-Jan-2004 12:31 GMT
Comment 24ikir02-Jan-2004 12:41 GMT
Comment 25Kjetil02-Jan-2004 13:52 GMT
Comment 26Anonymous02-Jan-2004 13:55 GMT
Comment 27Anonymous02-Jan-2004 13:55 GMT
Comment 28Kjetil02-Jan-2004 14:20 GMT
Comment 29Kjetil02-Jan-2004 14:24 GMT
Comment 30Leif02-Jan-2004 14:35 GMT
Comment 31Amon_ReRegistered user02-Jan-2004 15:07 GMT
Comment 32Leif02-Jan-2004 15:25 GMT
Comment 33Kronos02-Jan-2004 16:17 GMT
Comment 34Seehund02-Jan-2004 16:39 GMT
Comment 35Nate DownesRegistered user02-Jan-2004 17:49 GMT
Comment 36NekoRegistered user02-Jan-2004 18:38 GMT
Comment 37BrianK02-Jan-2004 20:03 GMT
Comment 38Amon_ReRegistered user02-Jan-2004 21:12 GMT
Comment 39Amon_ReRegistered user02-Jan-2004 21:13 GMT
Comment 40Amon_ReRegistered user02-Jan-2004 21:14 GMT
Comment 41Matt ParsonsRegistered user02-Jan-2004 21:23 GMT
Comment 42Amon_ReRegistered user03-Jan-2004 00:04 GMT
Comment 43Matt ParsonsRegistered user03-Jan-2004 00:27 GMT
Comment 44Kjetil03-Jan-2004 00:31 GMT
Comment 45Kronos03-Jan-2004 02:44 GMT
Comment 46Johan Rönnblom03-Jan-2004 15:15 GMT
Comment 47Alkis TsapanidisRegistered user03-Jan-2004 15:16 GMT
Comment 48Matt ParsonsRegistered user03-Jan-2004 15:33 GMT
Comment 49Amon_ReRegistered user03-Jan-2004 16:12 GMT
Comment 50Amon_ReRegistered user03-Jan-2004 16:14 GMT
Comment 51Amon_ReRegistered user03-Jan-2004 16:18 GMT
Comment 52hammer03-Jan-2004 23:32 GMT
Comment 53hammer03-Jan-2004 23:40 GMT
Comment 54hammer03-Jan-2004 23:42 GMT
Comment 55hammer03-Jan-2004 23:45 GMT
Comment 56Kjetil03-Jan-2004 23:45 GMT
Comment 57hammer03-Jan-2004 23:48 GMT
Comment 58Matt ParsonsRegistered user03-Jan-2004 23:49 GMT
Comment 59hammer03-Jan-2004 23:58 GMT
Comment 60Eric_Z04-Jan-2004 10:59 GMT
Comment 61Matt ParsonsRegistered user04-Jan-2004 11:24 GMT
Comment 62Kjetil04-Jan-2004 12:19 GMT
Comment 63Eric_Z04-Jan-2004 13:38 GMT
Comment 64hammer04-Jan-2004 20:31 GMT
Articia I : Comment 65 of 73ANN.lu
Posted by Eric_Z on 04-Jan-2004 23:05 GMT
In reply to Comment 64 (hammer):
Perhaps I should have worded it a bit differently:

Just because Apple only sells systems with CPUs running at 2.0 Ghz does not mean that IBM can't manufacture faster CPUs, there are other things for Apple to consider like heat dissapation and the increased bus speed as the 970 scales.
Jump...
#67 hammer #68 hammer
TopPrevious commentNext commentbottom
List of all comments to this article (continued)
Comment 66BrianK05-Jan-2004 00:45 GMT
Comment 67hammer05-Jan-2004 06:27 GMT
Comment 68hammer05-Jan-2004 06:32 GMT
Comment 69Olegil05-Jan-2004 07:12 GMT
Comment 70Anonymous05-Jan-2004 09:40 GMT
Comment 71hammer06-Jan-2004 01:02 GMT
Comment 72JoannaK06-Jan-2004 08:27 GMT
Comment 73BrianK08-Jan-2004 16:06 GMT
Back to Top