26-Apr-2024 01:09 GMT.
UNDER CONSTRUCTION
[News] Amiga Vs Thendic CaseANN.lu
Posted on 16-Mar-2004 05:47 GMT by Not Rich Woods (Edited on 2004-03-16 23:27:54 GMT by Christian Kemp)20 comments
View flat
View list
Amiga has filed an Appeal to their recently failed court case. Amongst the respondents for Amiga inc are Garry Hare and Francis Charig. Read it over on Amigaworld.net:http://amigaworld.net/modules/news/article.php?storyid=1307 The second part of the news item's title, "Amiga Files Appeal!" has been removed to avoid confusion, since it seems this was not the correct legal term.
List of all comments to this article
Sorted by date, most recent at bottom
Comment 1Graham_nli16-Mar-2004 04:57 GMT
Comment 2Mikey_C16-Mar-2004 05:51 GMT
Comment 3JKD16-Mar-2004 06:04 GMT
Comment 4ujb16-Mar-2004 09:41 GMT
Comment 5priest16-Mar-2004 09:46 GMT
Comment 6Steffen Haeuser16-Mar-2004 10:49 GMT
Comment 7Ketzer16-Mar-2004 13:18 GMT
Comment 8Stevey16-Mar-2004 13:28 GMT
Comment 9JoannaK16-Mar-2004 14:31 GMT
Comment 10Bernie MeyerRegistered user16-Mar-2004 14:45 GMT
Comment 11Ketzer16-Mar-2004 14:52 GMT
Comment 12MarkTime16-Mar-2004 14:58 GMT
Comment 13Christian KempRegistered user16-Mar-2004 15:12 GMT
Comment 14Christian KempRegistered user16-Mar-2004 15:14 GMT
Comment 15Bernie MeyerRegistered user16-Mar-2004 15:15 GMT
Comment 16MarkTime16-Mar-2004 15:28 GMT
Comment 17Tigger16-Mar-2004 16:38 GMT
Comment 18Spitballz16-Mar-2004 17:53 GMT
Comment 19Anonymous16-Mar-2004 18:25 GMT
Amiga Vs Thendic Case : Comment 20 of 20ANN.lu
Posted by Graham_nli on 17-Mar-2004 04:27 GMT
In reply to Comment 17 (Tigger):
"Chang provided information that strongly implys that Amiga Inc could never have carried out there end of the Thendic contract"

Read that contract. Giving over the source code was never an option in the contract as far as I could see.

Direct link: http://www.mindrelease.net/amiga-thendic/show_case_doc_57,16781,3,MAGIC,0,1.pdf

Item 5.2 limits what code Thendic could ask for. Genesi are trying to gain access based upon part (ii) of this clause, i.e., Amiga Inc failed to meet its side of the contract. However Amiga Inc. say that the reason that they haven't created any software for Thendic's products is because Thendic didn't meet the requirements of Item 5.1, and thus Amiga Inc were unable to continue.

Bill Buck says he tried to deliver hardware, meeting requirement 5.1. Amiga Inc. are now saying that he never did, and that he lied to the court (committing perjury) in order to win the previous case. Regardless, hardware never made it to Amiga Inc so they couldn't continue.

Anyway, the contract was for Thendic's Windows CE based system, and then other Thendic created products. AmigaDE ran on Windows CE, it would have been a matter of getting the hardware and specs, and testing the software and making small fixes if required. I'm even granting that Genesi can even claim under this agreement, the definition of Thendic earlier on does say "affiliated" companies (with some limitations).
Jump...
TopPrevious commentbottom
Back to Top