[Forum] Internet TV patent | ANN.lu |
Posted on 17-Jul-2004 09:33 GMT by Amon_Re | 62 comments View flat View list |
Yet another software patent that shouldn't have been granted :(
See here
|
|
List of all comments to this articleSorted by date, most recent at bottom |
Comment 1 | Kolbjørn Barmen | | 17-Jul-2004 10:14 GMT |
Comment 2 | Amon_Re | Registered user | 17-Jul-2004 10:38 GMT |
Comment 3 | Neko | Registered user | 17-Jul-2004 10:43 GMT |
Comment 4 | Fabio Alemagna | Registered user | 17-Jul-2004 10:45 GMT |
Comment 5 | Amon_Re | Registered user | 17-Jul-2004 12:20 GMT |
Comment 6 | Neko | Registered user | 17-Jul-2004 12:22 GMT |
Comment 7 | Amon_Re | Registered user | 17-Jul-2004 12:24 GMT |
Comment 8 | Fabio Alemagna | Registered user | 17-Jul-2004 12:24 GMT |
Comment 9 | Amon_Re | Registered user | 17-Jul-2004 12:25 GMT |
Comment 10 | Amon_Re | Registered user | 17-Jul-2004 12:26 GMT |
Comment 11 | Bill Toner | | 17-Jul-2004 13:24 GMT |
Comment 12 | Andrew Korn | | 17-Jul-2004 13:25 GMT |
Comment 13 | Joe "Floid" Kanowitz | | 17-Jul-2004 13:29 GMT |
Comment 14 | Don Cox | Registered user | 17-Jul-2004 14:06 GMT |
Comment 15 | Rafo | | 17-Jul-2004 15:07 GMT |
Comment 16 | Fabio Alemagna | Registered user | 17-Jul-2004 15:11 GMT |
Comment 17 | Bill Hoggett | | 17-Jul-2004 15:43 GMT |
Comment 18 | Amon_Re | Registered user | 17-Jul-2004 15:44 GMT |
Comment 19 | Neko | Registered user | 17-Jul-2004 17:45 GMT |
Comment 20 | Fabio Alemagna | Registered user | 17-Jul-2004 18:00 GMT |
Comment 21 | Bill Hoggett | | 17-Jul-2004 19:09 GMT |
Comment 22 | Amon_Re | Registered user | 17-Jul-2004 20:44 GMT |
Comment 23 | Kolbjørn Barmen | | 17-Jul-2004 22:56 GMT |
Comment 24 | Darrin | | 18-Jul-2004 02:52 GMT |
Comment 25 | Kronos | | 18-Jul-2004 04:45 GMT |
Comment 26 | Darrin | | 18-Jul-2004 05:11 GMT |
Comment 27 | Amon_Re | Registered user | 18-Jul-2004 06:16 GMT |
Comment 28 | Amon_Re | Registered user | 18-Jul-2004 06:28 GMT |
|
Internet TV patent : Comment 29 of 62 | ANN.lu |
Posted by Darrin on 18-Jul-2004 07:22 GMT | In reply to Comment 27 (Amon_Re): >Take a look into the way this sector evolved, copying idea's has always been
>here, and you have copyrights to prevent that of happening.
No, the laws do not "prevent" it from happening - otherwise it wouldn't happen. The law allows offenders to be punished for commiting the crime. Likewise the Patent itself is not going to stop the code being use, but it will allow the owner the ability to chase down and seek damages from those that do.
>(For instance, Microsoft obtained the right to use parts of MacOS in Windows
>3)
and? Did they pay for them? Doesn't this show that patents work?
>Software patents are unnatural due to the nature computing works, what would
> happen, for instance, if Microsoft were to create a "new" internet standard
> with nifty features, only to keep it locked up in their portfolio & only make
> it available to windows? The rest of the world would be locked out,
I'm sorry. I see nothing wrong with this example. If Mircosoft want to purchase or fund the R&D into such a feature then it's theirs to do with as they see fit. If they only want to include it in Windows and you want it that badly then buy Windows. If I want a BMW then I have to buy a BMW. If I want a chicken sandwich then it is pointless to buy a BLT and then complain loudly that there is no chicken in it.
>and don't you dare reverse ingeneer their protocol, or you'll have the DCMA up
> your ass...
LOL. And black helicopters overhead too :-)
>No it's not scare mongering, it's knowing the history of computing, and
>understanding how we got here in the first place.
Are you suggesting that if a certain Frenchman put a patent on a certain weaving loom then we wouldn't have got Space Invaders?!!! ;-)
>No, it will keep the guy on edge, making sure his implementation remains the
> best, and if someone does interfere with his code, there's always the anti-
>competition laws and copyrights, you don't need patents for that.
That's a bit late once your code is stolen and distributed for free or if your idea has been cloaned and sold to the world. The only thing the guy will be on the "edge" of is missing his next mortgage payment.
>This has absolutely nothing to do with copy protection on dvd's,
I was using DVD's as an example on how copyright alone doesn't protect anything and how there is a population who want everything for free. Welcome to the Napster Generation. :-)
> besides, the lawsuits in that field are all based on the DCMA act, and don't
> get me started on that piece of filth :) Besides, without DeCSS there would
> be no DVD players on linux or AOS or MOS, is that what you want? And you
>don't need DeCSS if you wanted to copy a dvd in the first place.
Why not? Surely someone would legally be able to release such a beast after payments have been made to the right people? Ah... we're arguing about PAYMENTS again. You know what I think of free meals ;-)
>It's gonna be needed.
I can tell!!!! :-)
Neko, where are you??!!! I need help!!!
The bugger has legged it while I distracted you!!! |
|
List of all comments to this article (continued) |
|
- User Menu
-
- About ANN archives
- The ANN archives is powered by #AmigaZeux. It was updated daily (news last: 22-Oct-2004; comments last: 18-May-2005).
ANN.lu was created, previously owned and maintained by Christian Kemp, www.ckemp.com.
- Contribute
- Not possible at this time!
- Search ANN archives
- Advanced search
- Hosting
- ANN.lu was hosted by Dreamhost. Sign up through this link, mention "ckemp" as referrer and he will get a 10% commission on any account you purchase.
Please show your appreciation for any past, present and future work on ANN.lu by making a contribution via PayPal.
|