02-Jul-2020 12:03 GMT.
[News] Pictures of the MicroA1 "Industrial" motherboardANN.lu
Posted on 17-Oct-2004 12:25 GMT by Not ArticiaP69 comments
View flat
View list
On this link you will see three pictures of the MicroA1 "Industrial" motherboard: http://lain.ziaspace.com/~ryu/a1. On the pictures you can see that it still uses the ArticiaS northbridge, as well as the VIA 686B southbridge, but a standalone Sil0680 IDE controller is there as well.
List of all comments to this article
Sorted by date, most recent at bottom
Comment 1Neil Thomas17-Oct-2004 11:25 GMT
Comment 2Adam Kowalczyk17-Oct-2004 12:15 GMT
Comment 3Joe17-Oct-2004 12:28 GMT
Comment 4Anonymous17-Oct-2004 13:22 GMT
Comment 5ikirRegistered user17-Oct-2004 13:23 GMT
Comment 6Anonymous17-Oct-2004 13:54 GMT
Comment 7Zylesea17-Oct-2004 14:55 GMT
Comment 8Neil Thomas17-Oct-2004 15:58 GMT
Comment 9Anonymous17-Oct-2004 16:06 GMT
Comment 10Undercover17-Oct-2004 17:25 GMT
Comment 11Alkis TsapanidisRegistered user17-Oct-2004 17:35 GMT
Comment 12Adam Kowalczyk17-Oct-2004 20:18 GMT
Comment 13JoannaK17-Oct-2004 20:55 GMT
Comment 14NekoRegistered user17-Oct-2004 21:51 GMT
Comment 15Anonymous17-Oct-2004 23:28 GMT
Comment 16Adam Kowalczyk18-Oct-2004 00:57 GMT
Comment 17Adam Kowalczyk18-Oct-2004 00:58 GMT
Comment 18Anonymous18-Oct-2004 05:15 GMT
Comment 19Anonymous18-Oct-2004 06:16 GMT
Comment 20Anonymous18-Oct-2004 06:29 GMT
Comment 21Anonymous18-Oct-2004 06:31 GMT
Comment 22Anonymous18-Oct-2004 06:35 GMT
Comment 23kalmar18-Oct-2004 06:38 GMT
Comment 24JoannaK18-Oct-2004 06:44 GMT
Comment 25Anonymous18-Oct-2004 06:45 GMT
Comment 26zylesea18-Oct-2004 06:49 GMT
Comment 27Anonymous18-Oct-2004 07:01 GMT
Comment 28Adam Kowalczyk18-Oct-2004 11:30 GMT
Comment 29Johan Rönnblom18-Oct-2004 13:31 GMT
Comment 30JoannaK18-Oct-2004 13:46 GMT
Comment 31Total Quality Experience18-Oct-2004 15:44 GMT
Comment 32Andreas Wolf18-Oct-2004 17:52 GMT
Comment 33Anonymous19-Oct-2004 00:19 GMT
Comment 34priestRegistered user19-Oct-2004 04:09 GMT
Comment 35Anonymous19-Oct-2004 04:39 GMT
Comment 36priestRegistered user19-Oct-2004 05:15 GMT
Comment 37Anonymous19-Oct-2004 06:21 GMT
Comment 38Anonymous19-Oct-2004 06:29 GMT
Comment 39Anonymous19-Oct-2004 07:03 GMT
Comment 40Anonymous19-Oct-2004 07:09 GMT
Comment 41Anonymous19-Oct-2004 07:12 GMT
Comment 42priestRegistered user19-Oct-2004 07:19 GMT
Comment 43Anonymous19-Oct-2004 07:33 GMT
Comment 44Anonymous19-Oct-2004 07:34 GMT
Comment 45priestRegistered user19-Oct-2004 07:34 GMT
Comment 46Anonymous19-Oct-2004 07:51 GMT
Comment 47Anonymous19-Oct-2004 07:53 GMT
Comment 48Anonymous19-Oct-2004 08:07 GMT
Comment 49Anonymous19-Oct-2004 08:42 GMT
Comment 50Anonymous19-Oct-2004 10:20 GMT
Comment 51Johan Rönnblom19-Oct-2004 10:43 GMT
Comment 52Don CoxRegistered user19-Oct-2004 10:48 GMT
Comment 53priestRegistered user19-Oct-2004 11:11 GMT
Comment 54JoannaK19-Oct-2004 11:29 GMT
Pictures of the MicroA1 "Industrial" motherboard : Comment 55 of 69ANN.lu
Posted by Anonymous on 19-Oct-2004 13:22 GMT
In reply to Comment 53 (priest):
> If one uses PCI ricer card with 3 slots, only one PCI card could be used?

It depends.

If you have passive riser (like most risers on the market) you can still use
only one PCI bus master card. In this kind of risers you can use 3 PCI cards
only if they do not work as bus masters. But I doubt if any not bus masters
PCI cards are still on the market (except 10Mbps cards).

There are active PCI risers, which include PCI-to-PCI bridges on-board. But
who know if Articia S supports them without problems?

> Do those stacked PCI-104 share the slot not needing more bus mastering capability?
> But could PCI-104 and PCI share #6? Bus master could then exist only on one or the other?

It looks like the PCI-104 slot in the uA1-I board is reduced PCI-104 slot
(lack of REQ1#, REQ2#, REQ3#, GNT1#, GNT2#, GNT3#). This slot allows to
install only one bus master capable PCI-104 card (controlled by REQ0#, GNT0#).

Or at least two PCI-104 cards when PCI card is not installed in the PCI slot. This is possible only if they decided to share PCI slot' REQ and GNT signals
with PCI-104 slot as the second masters pair (REQ1#, GNT1#).

> For industrial use that could be a superb solution.

But... the uA1-I boards have been offered for Amiga community. We are not
in industrial business here.

> Is there benchmarks of Radeon 7000 with AGP0x/2x/4x speeds?

In PCI mode (AGP x0) all data have to be sent to the Radeon memory by CPU.
In AGP x2 mode (x4, x8) texture data are copied from the system memory to
Radeon 7000 memory without using CPU. Radeon DMA AGP engine does it.

> If the GFX performance drops noticeably when comparing to uA1c, and if there is
> no special use for the Gb ethernet, one might reconsider... (still, the onboard firewire saves one PCI slot...)

Are you sure that in uA1-C the Radeon chip works in AGP x2 mode?
There are no info about the differences in on-board graphic
capabilities in C and I versions in these products advertisements.

Maybe the Radeon 7000 gfx chip in uA1-C is also configured in the PCI mode?
#56 priest
TopPrevious commentNext commentbottom
List of all comments to this article (continued)
Comment 56priestRegistered user19-Oct-2004 18:44 GMT
Comment 57JoannaK19-Oct-2004 20:21 GMT
Comment 58Anonymous20-Oct-2004 05:55 GMT
Comment 59priestRegistered user20-Oct-2004 12:58 GMT
Comment 60priestRegistered user20-Oct-2004 13:01 GMT
Comment 61Anonymous21-Oct-2004 05:25 GMT
Comment 62Anonymous21-Oct-2004 12:35 GMT
Comment 63Adam Kowalczyk21-Oct-2004 20:15 GMT
Comment 64takemehomegrandmaRegistered user22-Oct-2004 07:59 GMT
Comment 65Anonymous22-Oct-2004 09:14 GMT
Comment 66Adam Kowalczyk22-Oct-2004 10:10 GMT
Comment 67Agima22-Oct-2004 16:43 GMT
Comment 68Anonymous23-Oct-2004 16:37 GMT
Comment 69Adam Kowalczyk23-Oct-2004 16:58 GMT
Back to Top