27-Apr-2024 11:42 GMT.
UNDER CONSTRUCTION
[News] Alive Mediasoft back in businessANN.lu
Posted on 05-Dec-2000 12:54 GMT by Teemu I. Yliselä34 comments
View flat
View list

The ill-fated Alive Mediasoft are back, under the name Alive World. On their website they are selling Mac games, DVDs and, funnily enough, R'n'B music. In addition, MacWorld claim in their news item that "the company plans to ship a CD compilation of games called Amiga 4 Mac. It will be a collection of classic Amiga games and an Amiga OS emulator."

List of all comments to this article
Sorted by date, most recent at bottom
Comment 1Mikey C04-Dec-2000 23:00 GMT
Comment 2John Chandler04-Dec-2000 23:00 GMT
Comment 3Paolo "Mod3m" D'Urso04-Dec-2000 23:00 GMT
Comment 4Mikey C04-Dec-2000 23:00 GMT
Comment 5sauro04-Dec-2000 23:00 GMT
Comment 6its about time04-Dec-2000 23:00 GMT
Comment 7richie04-Dec-2000 23:00 GMT
Comment 8Marco Ridoni04-Dec-2000 23:00 GMT
Comment 9Andy04-Dec-2000 23:00 GMT
Comment 10Mikey C04-Dec-2000 23:00 GMT
Comment 11nOw204-Dec-2000 23:00 GMT
Comment 12Mikey C04-Dec-2000 23:00 GMT
Comment 13Anonymous04-Dec-2000 23:00 GMT
Comment 14victor #04-Dec-2000 23:00 GMT
Comment 15Budda04-Dec-2000 23:00 GMT
Comment 16Jonny Johansson04-Dec-2000 23:00 GMT
Comment 17David Connolly04-Dec-2000 23:00 GMT
Comment 18Daniel Hutchinson04-Dec-2000 23:00 GMT
Comment 19Daniel Hutchinson04-Dec-2000 23:00 GMT
Comment 20Jerry Gibbons04-Dec-2000 23:00 GMT
Comment 21David Connolly04-Dec-2000 23:00 GMT
Comment 22Bloke in the Shadows05-Dec-2000 23:00 GMT
Comment 23David Connolly05-Dec-2000 23:00 GMT
Comment 24Alexander Holland05-Dec-2000 23:00 GMT
Comment 25Alexander Holland05-Dec-2000 23:00 GMT
Comment 26Ville Sarell05-Dec-2000 23:00 GMT
Comment 27David Connolly05-Dec-2000 23:00 GMT
Comment 28Mark Wilson06-Dec-2000 23:00 GMT
Comment 29Anonymous06-Dec-2000 23:00 GMT
Comment 30Mark Wilson06-Dec-2000 23:00 GMT
Alive Mediasoft back in business : Comment 31 of 34ANN.lu
Posted by Mark Wilson on 06-Dec-2000 23:00 GMT
In reply to Comment 29 (Anonymous):
>David took the time to report AmiBench to trading standards because we refused >to publish his "press releases" (Someone had seemingly subscribed me to his >press release mailing list without my permisson)
Well who ever you are you are not part of the AmiBench Group because I only speak offically for AmiBench.
>No. Mark prints his e-mail address on the Amibench website. While he is >seemingly happy to give commercial advertising to one Amiga magazine (Amiga >Active) he wrote a rude e-mail to me accusing me of spam when I sent a press >release to him. Bearing in mind this apparent contradiction and connections >to .Amiga Active, a publication being already being sued by my company, I >reported it to the trading standards.
Right, I do print my address on AmiBench so people can contact me. I dont state anywhere that I want my email addess being added to a mailing list of any kind.
I have sent no one a "rude" email. Its interesting to note that you speak on David Connollys behalf buy using such words as (I quote here "he wrote a rude e-mail to me accusing me of spam when I sent a press release" and you have "rude" email from me. I would be very interested to see this "rude" email seeing as I am public relations for AmiBench - I take this as a very serious issue.
We give no commercial advertising to Amiga Companies. Oddly Most Amiga Companies refuse to sponsor us because we take trade away from them (by being in the second hand classifieds market).
>I guess then you shouldn't run a website that on one hand claims to be so far >away from commercialism that it can't accept press releases and on the other >is happy to promote itself like a commercial site, including making >advertising contracts.
We have only made advertising contacts with third party services such as Chris Kemp does with ANN (we use different companies that help pay server costs ans so on). Its my right to do as I wish on *my* site. I dont see anyone threatening to take Chris to court because he has "Commercial adverts" on his site.
>Plus why on earth Mark has decided to drag this out again other than to be >libellous I have no idea.
Who says I am being libellous? I dont think anything I have said is libellous.
Jump...
#34 Stephen Mowbray
TopPrevious commentNext commentbottom
List of all comments to this article (continued)
Comment 32Syzygy06-Dec-2000 23:00 GMT
Comment 33Syzygy06-Dec-2000 23:00 GMT
Comment 34Stephen Mowbray06-Dec-2000 23:00 GMT
Back to Top