28-Apr-2024 03:43 GMT.
UNDER CONSTRUCTION
[Motd] Advertisers neededANN.lu
Posted on 14-Jan-2001 13:22 GMT by Christian Kemp43 comments
View flat
View list
In a recent MOTD, I stated that the advertiser situation was bad, but I didn't expect to make less than 5$ in 13 days. So I decided to pull the only remaining advertisement banner, but I am hoping to find an alternative means of at least covering my online cost (various virtual servers, phone bill, etc.). I haven't given up the hope that Amiga companies (Amiga, Haage&Partner, and many others) will finally understand that the market would be even less alive without Amiga news sites, and finally decide to make suitable contributions to the news sites they've been using for years to post their press releases and announce their products on.

Do I sound slightly bitter? Perhaps. But with a phone bill of 100$ every month, an upcoming domain renewal for 90€, a website generating 5$ out of over 50,000 pageviews is just ridiculous...

List of all comments to this article
Sorted by date, most recent at bottom
Comment 1Elwood13-Jan-2001 23:00 GMT
Advertisers needed : Comment 2 of 43ANN.lu
Posted by Mark Wilson on 13-Jan-2001 23:00 GMT
In reply to Comment 1 (Elwood):
I know how Christian feels, I run AmiBench, and We hardly make enough to cover the cost of re-registering the domains in two years time.
Its a very sad state of affairs that when you contact an Amiga company asking if they would like to sponsor a well known Amiga site, most either dont bother responding, or the few that do just say "no".
If Christian feels anything like me he does not do this for the money - I bet its far from it.
And for all the purists out there who dont think we should make any money at all, Why can't we? You dont help us in any way, We are small indipentant sites, Without the revinue from banners we would have all shut up shop years ago.
Remeber nothing in this world is free.
Jump...
#3 Christian Kemp #11 Paul McCord
TopPrevious commentNext commentbottom
List of all comments to this article (continued)
Comment 3Christian Kemp13-Jan-2001 23:00 GMT
Comment 4nOMAAM13-Jan-2001 23:00 GMT
Comment 5Thomas Würgler13-Jan-2001 23:00 GMT
Comment 6Adam Waldenberg13-Jan-2001 23:00 GMT
Comment 7Adam Waldenberg13-Jan-2001 23:00 GMT
Comment 8Brian H13-Jan-2001 23:00 GMT
Comment 9JR13-Jan-2001 23:00 GMT
Comment 10Ian13-Jan-2001 23:00 GMT
Comment 11Paul McCord13-Jan-2001 23:00 GMT
Comment 12Chris Groves13-Jan-2001 23:00 GMT
Comment 13JW Olson13-Jan-2001 23:00 GMT
Comment 14Falk Lüke13-Jan-2001 23:00 GMT
Comment 15Christian Kemp13-Jan-2001 23:00 GMT
Comment 16Christian Kemp13-Jan-2001 23:00 GMT
Comment 17Christian Kemp13-Jan-2001 23:00 GMT
Comment 18nOMAAM13-Jan-2001 23:00 GMT
Comment 19Christian Kemp13-Jan-2001 23:00 GMT
Comment 20Michael Jantzen13-Jan-2001 23:00 GMT
Comment 21Mark Wilson13-Jan-2001 23:00 GMT
Comment 22kvince14-Jan-2001 23:00 GMT
Comment 23Paul Watkins14-Jan-2001 23:00 GMT
Comment 24Kolbjørn Barmen14-Jan-2001 23:00 GMT
Comment 25anonimus14-Jan-2001 23:00 GMT
Comment 26Jens Larsson14-Jan-2001 23:00 GMT
Comment 27John McKenzie14-Jan-2001 23:00 GMT
Comment 28Dundar Unsal14-Jan-2001 23:00 GMT
Comment 29Jason Murray14-Jan-2001 23:00 GMT
Comment 30Mousky14-Jan-2001 23:00 GMT
Comment 31Dave15-Jan-2001 23:00 GMT
Comment 32Jens Larsson15-Jan-2001 23:00 GMT
Comment 33Wayne Hunt15-Jan-2001 23:00 GMT
Comment 34David Connolly15-Jan-2001 23:00 GMT
Comment 35Mark Wilson16-Jan-2001 23:00 GMT
Comment 36John Block17-Jan-2001 23:00 GMT
Comment 37John Millington17-Jan-2001 23:00 GMT
Comment 38Christian Kemp17-Jan-2001 23:00 GMT
Comment 39John Block17-Jan-2001 23:00 GMT
Comment 40Falk Lüke17-Jan-2001 23:00 GMT
Comment 41Christian Kemp19-Jan-2001 23:00 GMT
Comment 42Falk Lüke19-Jan-2001 23:00 GMT
Comment 43anonymous29-Jan-2001 23:00 GMT
Back to Top