26-Apr-2024 15:36 GMT.
UNDER CONSTRUCTION
[Forum] Hyperion Entertainment blasts idea of x86 Amiga OSANN.lu
Posted on 30-Jul-2001 10:09 GMT by Ben Yoris/Hyperion322 comments
View flat
View list
Ben Hermans expresses Hyperion's official position about Amithlon.
Please read below (details section).
Regards,
Ben Yoris
PR Hyperion Entertainment Hyperion Entertainment blasts idea of x86 Amiga OS

Following the recent article in AmigActive and the announcement of the «Amithlon» product at Amiwest, we received quite a number of e-mails of people asking us our opinion about the desirability of a x86 AmigaOS as opposed to a PPC native OS.

Would we support it? What would be the consequences of a native x86 for Amiga developers?

In one word: disastrous. A native x86 Amiga OS would spell the end of all serious commercial development for Amiga OS.

Before we argue our point, let’s get a number of things out of the way here first:

The fact that Hyperion specialises in porting software for Windows has no bearing on our position because the Amiga market is only of marginal economic importance to us.

We moreover do not wish to be drawn into a debate about the respective merits of the PPC versus x86 architectures. Both CPU families deliver the goods in terms of performance and have their respective strengths and weaknesses. Unparalleled multimedia performance (Altivec), low power consumption and a clear 64 bit upgrade path for the PPC family and rapid development, raw horse-power and low price-point for the x86 family.

We also do not want to belittle the technical feats accomplished by VMC: their Amithlon product is technically impressive and very fast.

It also holds the danger of ending all serious commercial development for Amiga.

Why?

Because as soon as a x86 enters the picture, along tags Windows. In essence, the temptation for x86 users to have Windows installed in parallel to a native Amiga OS x86 will be irresistible and we will be seeing «dual boot» systems as we saw on Beos and now Linux x86.

Both Beos and Linux serve as a stern warning about what happens if you try to compete with Windows on the same hardware: you become relegated to a Windows add-on product without any native software to speak of.

Beos, despite being a very impressive OS, failed to get any marketshare, never had any serious applications and Hyperion has more game licenses than there were ever games for Beos.

Take a look at the Linux situation which we experienced first hand. How many native apps and games does Linux have? Despite the very large installed base, Linux only has one serious game developer (Loki) and the number of serious (non-server related) native apps can be counted on one hand.

The reason is simple: why would a software company invest money in porting its software to another x86 OS when it knows people can also boot into Windows or run an «emulator» like Wine or VMWare which allows you to run Windows software under Linux x86 at near native speeds? The costs could never be recuperated through sales.

The result is clear: nobody is buying any product for Linux. A major, brand-new game-title can at best expect to sell a few thousand copies on Linux and several tens of thousands on Mac. Plus on Linux x86 you need to keep your pricing in line with the Windows version (without having the benefits of the economies of scale that the Windows market offers) otherwise you will provide even more incentive for people to buy Windows products.

Linux x86 is currently relegated to the status of a Windows add-on with a lot of software (like the Corel products and media-players) just working on Linux x86 because it uses Windows code in some way or another.

Linux has carved out a very nice niche in the server and embedded systems markets but the desktop market is a joke with all major Linux companies closing down or shedding jobs because nobody was making any money with desktop Linux.

So when somebody asks you: who has the bigger market-share on the desktop, Red Hat Linux or Apple Mac, the answer is: who cares? The real question is: who is making (more) money on the desktop and what desk-top platform has a wider range of native applications and games.

Mac OS X could be brought to x86 relatively easily. The core of Mac OS X already runs on x86 but there isn’t a hair on Steve Jobs’ head that thinks about giving up his nicely insulated niche-market in favor of head to head competition with Windows on the same hardware. Apple wants its developers to stay in business so they can keep Apple’s users happy by providing them with software not available on other platforms.

The resources that large commercial developers on Windows can command and the price-point they can reach by the sheer number of sales cannot be matched by developers on a niche-platform who can only survive in their niche-market if that platform is insulated from the Windows market.

People advocating a native x86 Amiga OS should look beyond the cheap hardware and understand they are condemning the Amiga desktop platform to become an emulation platform for old software with no new native software available.

Nobody but a handful of fanatics will pay more money to run a slower (partially emulated) version of the same or similar software on Windows when they can instead buy a cheaper, faster, native Windows-version which can run on the same hardware.

What good is cheap hardware when you have no software to run on your native x86 OS and you are forced to boot into Windows all the time? How long would it take before the development of such an OS would fall by the wayside because of low sales, which is exactly what happened to Beos?

Ben Hermans Managing partner Hyperion Entertainment
List of all comments to this article
Sorted by date, most recent at bottom
Comment 1Gareth Knight29-Jul-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 2Claus29-Jul-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 3Frodo29-Jul-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 4A. Vallinotto29-Jul-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 5Claus29-Jul-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 6Anonymous29-Jul-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 7Gareth Knight29-Jul-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 8Anonymous29-Jul-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 9Amiga Informers Soothsayer29-Jul-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 10Gareth Knight29-Jul-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 11Tinman29-Jul-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 12Sinan Gurjkan29-Jul-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 13Anthony Becker29-Jul-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 14mark29-Jul-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 15Tinman29-Jul-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 16Brecht29-Jul-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 17Ben Hermans/Hyperion29-Jul-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 18Gareth Knight29-Jul-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 19Brecht29-Jul-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 20Brecht29-Jul-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 21Anonymous29-Jul-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 22Mekanix29-Jul-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 23Francisco29-Jul-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 24Ben Hermans/Hyperion29-Jul-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 25Chris29-Jul-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 26szutoman29-Jul-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 27Hans-Joerg Frieden29-Jul-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 28Hans-Joerg Frieden29-Jul-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 29Hans-Joerg Frieden29-Jul-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 30damocles29-Jul-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 31Brecht29-Jul-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 32Brecht29-Jul-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 33Ben Hermans29-Jul-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 34Kelly Samel29-Jul-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 35Ben Hermans/Hyperion29-Jul-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 36Brecht29-Jul-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 37david29-Jul-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 38Brecht29-Jul-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 39Mekanix29-Jul-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 40Ben Hermans/Hyperion29-Jul-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 41Brecht29-Jul-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 42Elwood29-Jul-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 43Bill Toner29-Jul-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 44Ben Hermans/Hyperion29-Jul-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 45Mekanix29-Jul-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 46Ben Hermans/Hyperion29-Jul-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 47Anonymous29-Jul-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 48Brecht29-Jul-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 49david29-Jul-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 50Elwood29-Jul-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 51Rick Rodriguez29-Jul-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 52Alkis Tsapanidis29-Jul-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 53Ben Hermans/Hyperion29-Jul-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 54Elwood29-Jul-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 55Ben Hermans/Hyperion29-Jul-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 56Hagge29-Jul-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 57Elwood29-Jul-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 58Mekanix29-Jul-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 59Elwood29-Jul-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 60Brecht29-Jul-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 61OneVision (Ben Y.)29-Jul-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 62Brecht29-Jul-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 63Elwood29-Jul-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 64Ben Yoris29-Jul-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 65dakang29-Jul-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 66Elwood29-Jul-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 67Brecht29-Jul-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 68Mekanix29-Jul-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 69Brecht29-Jul-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 70Stephen Illingworth29-Jul-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 71doobrey29-Jul-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 72Alcemyst29-Jul-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 73smith_rouelle29-Jul-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 74Ben Hermans/Hyperion29-Jul-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 75Dale McCrory29-Jul-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 76smith_rouelle29-Jul-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 77Brecht29-Jul-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 78Ben Hermans/Hyperion29-Jul-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 79Mekanix29-Jul-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 80A3K29-Jul-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 81Paul29-Jul-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 82Martin Blom29-Jul-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 83David Burnett29-Jul-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 84Sinan Gurkan29-Jul-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 85smith_rouelle29-Jul-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 86Johan Rönnblom29-Jul-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 87Ben Hermans/Hyperion29-Jul-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 88NihilVor29-Jul-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 89Hans-Joerg Frieden29-Jul-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 90Ville Sarell29-Jul-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 91Alkis Tsapanidis29-Jul-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 92Hans-Joerg Frieden29-Jul-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 93A3K29-Jul-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 94Anonymous29-Jul-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 95Brecht29-Jul-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 96Ville Sarell29-Jul-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 97dakang29-Jul-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 98José29-Jul-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 99José29-Jul-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 100A3K29-Jul-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 101Daniel Hutchinson29-Jul-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 102X86Free29-Jul-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 103Stefan Blixth29-Jul-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 104Calling all fellow Amigans29-Jul-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 105Johan Rönnblom29-Jul-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 106Martin Blom29-Jul-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 107The Midnight Toker29-Jul-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 108Anonymous29-Jul-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 109Anonymous29-Jul-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 110The Midnight Toker29-Jul-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 111José29-Jul-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 112Georg Steger29-Jul-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 113George Sharp29-Jul-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 114Stefan Blixth29-Jul-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 115shadowfax29-Jul-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 116Kulwant Bhogal29-Jul-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 117Aram Iskenderian29-Jul-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 118George Sharp29-Jul-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 119Andy Morgan29-Jul-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 120George Sharp29-Jul-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 121Dorivalter29-Jul-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 122Ville Sarell29-Jul-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 123Darrin29-Jul-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 124Brecht29-Jul-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 125George Sharp29-Jul-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 126George Sharp29-Jul-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 127Calen29-Jul-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 128AdmV0rl0n29-Jul-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 129Anonymous29-Jul-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 130José29-Jul-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 131Tinman29-Jul-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 132Kay Are Ulvestad29-Jul-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 133KenH29-Jul-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 134José29-Jul-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 135Anonymous29-Jul-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 136Jeff Pierce29-Jul-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 137Chief Tuskalousa29-Jul-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 138Alcemyst29-Jul-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 139Ben Hermans/Hyperion29-Jul-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 140DDJ29-Jul-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 141Alcemyst29-Jul-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 142Alcemyst29-Jul-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 143just me30-Jul-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 144George30-Jul-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 145gvddgs30-Jul-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 146Brecht30-Jul-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 147Anonymous30-Jul-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 148John McKenzie30-Jul-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 149Marc Leveille30-Jul-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 150Marc Leveille30-Jul-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 151Anonymous30-Jul-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 152Richie30-Jul-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 153Richie30-Jul-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 154Gregory Bailey30-Jul-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 155Alcemyst30-Jul-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 156Gregory Bailey30-Jul-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 157Kolbjørn Barmen30-Jul-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 158Alcemyst30-Jul-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 159Kolbjørn Barmen30-Jul-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 160Kolbjørn Barmen30-Jul-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 161Dave Mountford30-Jul-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 162Ben Yoris/Hyperion30-Jul-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 163Roj30-Jul-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 164Anonymous30-Jul-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 165Anonymous30-Jul-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 166Solar (BAUD)30-Jul-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 167Solar (BAUD)30-Jul-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 168John P.30-Jul-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 169Ben Hermans/Hyperion30-Jul-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 170Solar (BAUD)30-Jul-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 171Cybes30-Jul-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 172Ben Hermans/Hyperion30-Jul-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 173Solar (BAUD)30-Jul-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 174Sinan Gurkan30-Jul-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 175simon noble30-Jul-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 176Ben Hermans/Hyperion30-Jul-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 177EmGee30-Jul-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 178Brecht30-Jul-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 179anonymous30-Jul-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 180Brecht30-Jul-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 181dakang30-Jul-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 182Steffen Haeuser30-Jul-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 183Solar (BAUD)30-Jul-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 184Ben Hermans/Hyperion30-Jul-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 185José30-Jul-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 186priest30-Jul-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 187Sinan Gürkan30-Jul-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 188Adrian D'Alessio30-Jul-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 189Chris30-Jul-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 190José30-Jul-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 191Phill Wooller30-Jul-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 192José30-Jul-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 193Chris30-Jul-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 194anon30-Jul-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 195Glaucus30-Jul-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 196cmdt30-Jul-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 197Brecht30-Jul-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 198Glaucus30-Jul-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 199Brecht30-Jul-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 200Joe30-Jul-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 201Brecht30-Jul-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 202Priest30-Jul-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 203Brecht30-Jul-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 204alffx30-Jul-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 205Ville Sarell30-Jul-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 206Glaucus30-Jul-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 207anonymous30-Jul-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 208Brecht30-Jul-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 209anonymous30-Jul-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 210Anonymous30-Jul-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 211Glaucus30-Jul-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 212Brecht30-Jul-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 213skal30-Jul-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 214Steffen Haeuser30-Jul-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 215Brecht30-Jul-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 216Marc Leveille30-Jul-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 217Ben Hermans/Hyperion30-Jul-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 218Ben Hermans/Hyperion30-Jul-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 219Ben Hermans/Hyperion30-Jul-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 220Galahad / Fairlight30-Jul-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 221Brecht30-Jul-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 222Zubair30-Jul-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 223alffx30-Jul-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 224Mekanix30-Jul-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 225Gravedigger30-Jul-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 226Ben Hermans/Hyperion30-Jul-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 227skal31-Jul-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 228Mika Hanhijärvi31-Jul-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 229Mika Hanhijärvi31-Jul-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 230Sinan Gurkan31-Jul-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 231Danny Salomon31-Jul-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 232Priest31-Jul-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 233smith_rouelle31-Jul-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 234Mekanix31-Jul-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 235Solar (BAUD)31-Jul-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 236Steffen Haeuser31-Jul-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 237biggus31-Jul-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 238Brecht31-Jul-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 239Ben Yoris31-Jul-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 240Darrin31-Jul-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 241Jorge31-Jul-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 242Ralph Schmidt31-Jul-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 243Darrin31-Jul-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 244John Doe31-Jul-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 245Steffen Haeuser31-Jul-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 246Anonymous31-Jul-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 247CH31-Jul-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 248Ich Liebe Dich31-Jul-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 249José31-Jul-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 250José31-Jul-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 251John Klumpp31-Jul-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 252A3K31-Jul-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 253José31-Jul-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 254José31-Jul-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 255Brecht31-Jul-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 256Glaucus31-Jul-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 257Brecht31-Jul-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 258Mika Hanhijärvi31-Jul-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 259John Klumpp31-Jul-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 260Alcemyst31-Jul-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 261John Klumpp31-Jul-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 262Chip31-Jul-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 263Mika Hanhijärvi31-Jul-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 264John Klumpp31-Jul-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 265Mika Hanhijärvi31-Jul-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 266John Klumpp31-Jul-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 267HammerD31-Jul-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 268John Klumpp31-Jul-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 269anonymous31-Jul-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 270Alcemyst31-Jul-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 271amoogamad31-Jul-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 272Alcemyst31-Jul-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 273Darrin31-Jul-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 274Glaucus31-Jul-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 275Glaucus31-Jul-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 276Mika Hanhijärvi31-Jul-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 277Darrin31-Jul-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 278Brecht31-Jul-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 279Glaucus31-Jul-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 280Brecht31-Jul-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 281Alcemyst31-Jul-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 282Alcemyst31-Jul-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 283Alcemyst31-Jul-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 284Alcemyst31-Jul-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 285Darrin31-Jul-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 286Alcemyst31-Jul-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 287Brecht31-Jul-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 288Darrin31-Jul-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 289Tinman31-Jul-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 290Brecht31-Jul-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 291José31-Jul-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 292Darrin31-Jul-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 293Amifan31-Jul-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 294David Scheibler31-Jul-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 295Amifan31-Jul-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 296Darrin31-Jul-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 297Darrin31-Jul-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 298Brecht01-Aug-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 299Brecht01-Aug-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 300Mike01-Aug-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 301Brecht01-Aug-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 302the man in the shadows01-Aug-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 303Alcemyst01-Aug-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 304m0ns00n01-Aug-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 305Solar (BAUD)01-Aug-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 306Anonymous01-Aug-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 307Anonymous01-Aug-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 308Ralph Schmidt01-Aug-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 309PPCRulez01-Aug-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 310Anonymous01-Aug-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 311Kay Are Ulvestad01-Aug-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 312Ben Yoris/Hyperion01-Aug-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 313Brecht01-Aug-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 314Brecht01-Aug-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 315Mekanix01-Aug-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 316Mika Hanhijärvi01-Aug-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 317anon01-Aug-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 318Darkhawk02-Aug-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 319szuko02-Aug-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 320Kay Are Ulvestad02-Aug-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 321Ben Yoris/Hyperion02-Aug-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 322Darkhawk02-Aug-2001 22:00 GMT
Back to Top