[News] OS3.9 Boingbag 2 available | ANN.lu |
Posted on 20-Mar-2002 18:03 GMT by Christian Kemp | 125 comments View flat View list |
Jarmo Laakkonen writes:
H&P is proud to announce the availability of Boing Bag 2 for AmigaOS 3.9
OS 3.9: Boing Bag 2 available now!
20. March 2002: H&P is proud to announce the availability of Boing Bag 2
for AmigaOS 3.9. Boing Bag 3.9-2 contains many bug fixes, small
enhancement and new features in the areas multimedia (AMPlifier, PlayCD,
sound datatype), shell, Workbench (Find, AsyncWB, UnArc, XAD v10),
ReAction and harddisk support. The Boing Bag is delivered in three parts:
The main archive with all the files needed to update AmigaOS 3.9, the
translations into different languages and the contributions (CDDB library,
OpenURL, ClassAction). We want to thank all people that made it possible.
Please download at least the main archive and the translation(s) for the
language(s) you desire. The contributions are optional.
Note: This Update requires AmigaOS 3.9 with Boing Bag 1. AmigaOS XL users
can install the Boing Bag 2 directly.
www.haage-partner.com
|
|
List of all comments to this article |
OS3.9 Boingbag 2 available : Comment 84 of 125 | ANN.lu |
Posted by smithy on 21-Mar-2002 18:11 GMT | In reply to Comment 65 (Christophe Decanini): Christophe Decanini
>Here we go again.
>Darklite come here to do some provocation.
>As soon as someone replies to him big Dad Bill Hogget come to help him.
>Then Moonsoon or Mekanix will eventualy come to help too.
Interesting that you mention those who actually provide well-reasoned arguments, while you make no comment about the anti-x86 brigade who constantly fill ANN up with comments that are often no more than "F*** you".
Is it because you agree with the anti-x86 brigade that you make no mention of their collective attempts to bury real thought-provoking posts with their continual bad-language and unconstructive insults?
Or is it because you yourself have an opinion and don't want to see well reasoned arguments against it that might convinve others?
Either way, your attitude is wholly inappropriate for a moderator at a site that is supposed to be neutral. It is your responsibility to ensure the free-flowing of news and comment, not to criticise your own users because they express well-rounded opinions just because those who share your opinion are unable to argue why they support it, beyond religious reasoning. |
|
List of all comments to this article (continued) |
|
- User Menu
-
- About ANN archives
- The ANN archives is powered by #AmigaZeux. It was updated daily (news last: 22-Oct-2004; comments last: 18-May-2005).
ANN.lu was created, previously owned and maintained by Christian Kemp, www.ckemp.com.
- Contribute
- Not possible at this time!
- Search ANN archives
- Advanced search
- Hosting
- ANN.lu was hosted by Dreamhost. Sign up through this link, mention "ckemp" as referrer and he will get a 10% commission on any account you purchase.
Please show your appreciation for any past, present and future work on ANN.lu by making a contribution via PayPal.
|