26-Apr-2024 23:46 GMT.
UNDER CONSTRUCTION
[Rant] Microsoft extend their monopolistic behaviours (again)ANN.lu
Posted on 11-Aug-2002 13:33 GMT by Cyberwlf56 comments
View flat
View list
Microsoft have cracked down on retailers trying to sell alternate OS's when they sign a contract to sell Windoze. (This theoretically effecting people selling Amithlon pre-installed, or the likes). Essentially saying... : (from slashdot.org) "Some Sys Admin sent in an email that he got from Dell which basically says Microsoft will no longer allow Dell to sell PCs without an operating system. " - But if you think this was only Dell, the wording seems to effect all retailers, read article for more information: http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=02/08/10/1420208.
List of all comments to this article
Sorted by date, most recent at bottom
Comment 1DaveW11-Aug-2002 12:04 GMT
Comment 2smithy11-Aug-2002 12:34 GMT
Comment 3[JC]11-Aug-2002 13:57 GMT
Comment 43seas11-Aug-2002 14:00 GMT
Comment 53seas11-Aug-2002 14:04 GMT
Comment 63seas11-Aug-2002 14:16 GMT
Comment 73seas11-Aug-2002 14:20 GMT
Comment 8takemehomegrandma11-Aug-2002 15:12 GMT
Comment 9Anonymous11-Aug-2002 16:30 GMT
Comment 10cOrpse11-Aug-2002 17:15 GMT
Comment 11cOrpse11-Aug-2002 17:20 GMT
Comment 12sutro11-Aug-2002 18:09 GMT
Comment 133seas11-Aug-2002 18:14 GMT
Comment 14smithy11-Aug-2002 19:02 GMT
Comment 15[JC]11-Aug-2002 22:31 GMT
Comment 163seas12-Aug-2002 00:38 GMT
Comment 17012-Aug-2002 04:25 GMT
Comment 18Samface12-Aug-2002 06:02 GMT
Comment 19hgm12-Aug-2002 06:33 GMT
Comment 20Samface12-Aug-2002 09:41 GMT
Comment 21takemehomegrandma12-Aug-2002 09:55 GMT
Comment 22hgm12-Aug-2002 10:05 GMT
Comment 23Kjetil12-Aug-2002 10:33 GMT
Comment 24DaveW12-Aug-2002 10:43 GMT
Comment 25Kjetil12-Aug-2002 11:22 GMT
Comment 26DaveW12-Aug-2002 11:58 GMT
Comment 27Anonymous12-Aug-2002 12:09 GMT
Comment 28Alan Croft12-Aug-2002 12:27 GMT
Comment 29Anonymous12-Aug-2002 13:29 GMT
Comment 30hgm12-Aug-2002 13:44 GMT
Comment 31DaveW12-Aug-2002 15:13 GMT
Comment 32[JC]12-Aug-2002 15:13 GMT
Comment 33[JC]12-Aug-2002 15:15 GMT
Comment 34coldfire12-Aug-2002 16:09 GMT
Comment 35[JC]12-Aug-2002 19:02 GMT
Comment 36013-Aug-2002 06:50 GMT
Comment 37013-Aug-2002 06:52 GMT
Comment 38[JC]13-Aug-2002 12:05 GMT
Comment 39DaveW13-Aug-2002 12:16 GMT
Comment 40013-Aug-2002 12:18 GMT
Comment 41Bill Hoggett13-Aug-2002 13:52 GMT
Comment 42DaveW13-Aug-2002 17:19 GMT
Comment 43Bill Hoggett13-Aug-2002 18:54 GMT
Microsoft extend their monopolistic behaviours (again) : Comment 44 of 56ANN.lu
Posted by Kjetil on 14-Aug-2002 04:47 GMT
In reply to Comment 30 (hgm):
The fact that you can turn on/off memory protection don’t make it less MP,
What you failed to say is that 68k programs do not have MP, this is true, after all you can’t have memory protection on 68k programs as they do not use an modern argument passing system it is totally based on shard memory all the way, an there is no track record in 68k so programs can’t free memory from crashed 68k programs, butt this is the past, most 68k programs will be absolute when they get ported to PPC OS4.0 binary or when there comes an compotator to the old program’s, in the end you most likely wont run Any 68k programs, just like you do not run any win31 programs win windows2000, they are simply out dated.
And as far at turning on / off memory protection is concerned, there is no need to turn off memory protection unless you are making an patch or making an update for the OS, when you are finished with product you simply get Ainc to include it in the new Exec kernel, this way every one else can have it turned on, to protect there system from crashes.
Well what I’m saying it is and advantage to be able to turn on and off MP, not a disadvantage.
Jump...
#45 hgm #46 hgm #47 DaveW
TopPrevious commentNext commentbottom
List of all comments to this article (continued)
Comment 45hgm14-Aug-2002 08:01 GMT
Comment 46hgm14-Aug-2002 08:01 GMT
Comment 47DaveW14-Aug-2002 08:32 GMT
Comment 48Kjetil14-Aug-2002 11:35 GMT
Comment 49Kjetil14-Aug-2002 11:44 GMT
Comment 50Brad Ray14-Aug-2002 16:13 GMT
Comment 51Bill Hoggett14-Aug-2002 17:31 GMT
Comment 52hgm14-Aug-2002 17:38 GMT
Comment 53Frank15-Aug-2002 00:36 GMT
Comment 54kjetil15-Aug-2002 05:28 GMT
Comment 55DaveW15-Aug-2002 07:55 GMT
Comment 56Brad Ray16-Aug-2002 20:41 GMT
Back to Top