30-Nov-2021 10:07 GMT.
UNDER CONSTRUCTION
[News] RC5-64 HAS BEEN SOLVED!ANN.lu
Posted on 26-Sep-2002 20:30 GMT by Christophe Decanini33 comments
View flat
View list
Your Amiga (or other) can rest now :)
Too bad the key was not found by the Amiga team. Anyway we will have more power for new contest with the AmigaOne/Pegasos/Amithlon.
Here are the details.
List of all comments to this article
Sorted by date, most recent at bottom
Comment 1Christophe Decanini26-Sep-2002 18:34 GMT
Comment 2Gregg26-Sep-2002 19:22 GMT
Comment 3reflect26-Sep-2002 19:43 GMT
Comment 4Paul Hill26-Sep-2002 19:46 GMT
Comment 5cOrpse26-Sep-2002 20:09 GMT
Comment 6John Niclasen26-Sep-2002 20:11 GMT
Comment 7Anonymous26-Sep-2002 20:19 GMT
Comment 8Mike Veroukis26-Sep-2002 23:02 GMT
Comment 9Christophe Decanini27-Sep-2002 00:02 GMT
Comment 10Anonymous27-Sep-2002 01:07 GMT
Comment 11Álmos Rajnai27-Sep-2002 04:49 GMT
Comment 12reflect27-Sep-2002 05:04 GMT
Comment 13Ole-Egil27-Sep-2002 07:10 GMT
Comment 14alan buxey27-Sep-2002 08:36 GMT
RC5-64 HAS BEEN SOLVED! : Comment 15 of 33ANN.lu
Posted by alan buxey on 27-Sep-2002 08:40 GMT
In reply to Comment 6 (John Niclasen):
....and most of these machines were on for their natural
'on time' anyway - i never switch off my computer....too
much wear and tear and heat cycles for the components.
anyway, its impossible to calculate the total energy. sure,
you can take the CPU info and calculate how much energy
was used by each CPU type at each clock speed....but what
about the rest of the system? was it a basic PC..or
did it have a 40W gfx card? did it have an energy efficient
PSU...or a TFT monitor? did the user have energy saving
enabled for other parts...or was the network card always
active..and hence the switch and cable-box always on?
it was (and still is) a very good exercise and trial for the future
of computing
alan
Jump...
TopPrevious commentNext commentbottom
List of all comments to this article (continued)
Comment 16alan buxey27-Sep-2002 08:42 GMT
Comment 17alan buxey27-Sep-2002 08:44 GMT
Comment 18reflect27-Sep-2002 08:52 GMT
Comment 19Anonymous27-Sep-2002 10:00 GMT
Comment 20Hagge27-Sep-2002 10:34 GMT
Comment 21reflect27-Sep-2002 10:53 GMT
Comment 22Ole-Egil27-Sep-2002 11:04 GMT
Comment 23Linus G27-Sep-2002 11:16 GMT
Comment 24Christophe Decanini27-Sep-2002 13:30 GMT
Comment 25The_Editor27-Sep-2002 14:18 GMT
Comment 26Anonymous27-Sep-2002 14:39 GMT
Comment 27Mike Veroukis27-Sep-2002 14:50 GMT
Comment 28Christophe Decanini27-Sep-2002 16:29 GMT
Comment 29Mike Veroukis27-Sep-2002 16:48 GMT
Comment 30alan buxey28-Sep-2002 17:03 GMT
Comment 31anarchic_teapot28-Sep-2002 19:36 GMT
Comment 32Phill29-Sep-2002 13:23 GMT
Comment 33The_Editor29-Sep-2002 18:01 GMT
Back to Top