30-Nov-2021 08:20 GMT.
UNDER CONSTRUCTION
[News] RC5-64 HAS BEEN SOLVED!ANN.lu
Posted on 26-Sep-2002 20:30 GMT by Christophe Decanini33 comments
View flat
View list
Your Amiga (or other) can rest now :)
Too bad the key was not found by the Amiga team. Anyway we will have more power for new contest with the AmigaOne/Pegasos/Amithlon.
Here are the details.
List of all comments to this article
Sorted by date, most recent at bottom
Comment 1Christophe Decanini26-Sep-2002 18:34 GMT
Comment 2Gregg26-Sep-2002 19:22 GMT
Comment 3reflect26-Sep-2002 19:43 GMT
Comment 4Paul Hill26-Sep-2002 19:46 GMT
Comment 5cOrpse26-Sep-2002 20:09 GMT
Comment 6John Niclasen26-Sep-2002 20:11 GMT
Comment 7Anonymous26-Sep-2002 20:19 GMT
Comment 8Mike Veroukis26-Sep-2002 23:02 GMT
Comment 9Christophe Decanini27-Sep-2002 00:02 GMT
Comment 10Anonymous27-Sep-2002 01:07 GMT
Comment 11Álmos Rajnai27-Sep-2002 04:49 GMT
Comment 12reflect27-Sep-2002 05:04 GMT
Comment 13Ole-Egil27-Sep-2002 07:10 GMT
Comment 14alan buxey27-Sep-2002 08:36 GMT
Comment 15alan buxey27-Sep-2002 08:40 GMT
Comment 16alan buxey27-Sep-2002 08:42 GMT
Comment 17alan buxey27-Sep-2002 08:44 GMT
Comment 18reflect27-Sep-2002 08:52 GMT
RC5-64 HAS BEEN SOLVED! : Comment 19 of 33ANN.lu
Posted by Anonymous on 27-Sep-2002 10:00 GMT
Excellent.
This project has proved just how secure RC5-64 actually is.
It took thousands of computers working in parallel for over two YEARS to crack one single message. A message of which (and this is the important part), they had been given the start!
Yes. Amazing. 2 YEARS and thousands of computers to crack an encrypted message when they already knew part of the message.
Remind me how that proves to Joe Sixpack how RC5-64 is supposed to be insecure?
Jump...
#24 Christophe Decanini
TopPrevious commentNext commentbottom
List of all comments to this article (continued)
Comment 20Hagge27-Sep-2002 10:34 GMT
Comment 21reflect27-Sep-2002 10:53 GMT
Comment 22Ole-Egil27-Sep-2002 11:04 GMT
Comment 23Linus G27-Sep-2002 11:16 GMT
Comment 24Christophe Decanini27-Sep-2002 13:30 GMT
Comment 25The_Editor27-Sep-2002 14:18 GMT
Comment 26Anonymous27-Sep-2002 14:39 GMT
Comment 27Mike Veroukis27-Sep-2002 14:50 GMT
Comment 28Christophe Decanini27-Sep-2002 16:29 GMT
Comment 29Mike Veroukis27-Sep-2002 16:48 GMT
Comment 30alan buxey28-Sep-2002 17:03 GMT
Comment 31anarchic_teapot28-Sep-2002 19:36 GMT
Comment 32Phill29-Sep-2002 13:23 GMT
Comment 33The_Editor29-Sep-2002 18:01 GMT
Back to Top