|[Forum] What about this?||ANN.lu|
|Posted on 03-May-2003 13:23 GMT by Amigan (Edited on 2003-05-03 16:30:31 GMT by Teemu I. Yliselä)||54 comments|
Here is another no payment, we must to know ALL THE TRUTH, not only that BBRV wants to say for his interest and bussines. If you don´t know, Bill Buck was the man behind VISCORP. Clik here
|List of all comments to this article|
|What about this? : Comment 38 of 54||ANN.lu|
|Posted by bbrv on 06-May-2003 10:12 GMT|
|In reply to Comment 37 (3seas):|
Hi 3seas, you are entitled to your opinion. We do not think you are in a position to make the judgment, because you simply were not involved and you are confusing our Press Releases with the comments/editorial of others. If Escom had not gone into bankruptcy it would have all worked quite well. I said "notarized." Did you read that? Do you know what that means in Germany? We were a public company and so was Escom. We had to announce things precisely, legally.
Re: Gambled?! We were just trying to survive. Without 3.1 we were dead. In fact, from the "trust" point of view I think we were as honest and as diligent as we possibly could have been. We still tried to make the deal happen and we kept Amiga Inc. alive with our own funds and little support from the Chairman who controlled all the finances. We never recovered this money directly. However, we were able to sell a few shares of VisCorp long after we left and this covered the loss.
Re: Ownership. At one point we owned 17% of the Company, but "control" is another thing.
Finally, hasn't the "statue of limitations" worn out yet...? :-)
|List of all comments to this article (continued)||