27-Apr-2024 01:52 GMT.
UNDER CONSTRUCTION
[News] The COMPLETE civil docket for Thendic Electronics, et al v. Amiga IncANN.lu
Posted on 14-Nov-2003 21:02 GMT by samface99 comments
View flat
View list
You can find the COMPLETE civil docket for the Thendic Electronics, et al v. Amiga Inc court case here. These files has been retrieved through the Public Access to Court Electronic Records (PACER) system and has been reproduced as a whole and completely as published in the Case Management/Electronic Case Files system on U.S. District Court Western District of Washington's website.
List of all comments to this article
Sorted by date, most recent at bottom
Comment 1Matt Parsons14-Nov-2003 20:53 GMT
Comment 2Tigger14-Nov-2003 20:54 GMT
Comment 3samface14-Nov-2003 21:15 GMT
Comment 4samface14-Nov-2003 21:19 GMT
Comment 5CnlPepper14-Nov-2003 21:27 GMT
Comment 6TheRealNapsterRegistered user14-Nov-2003 21:45 GMT
Comment 7IanSRegistered user14-Nov-2003 22:06 GMT
Comment 8Nate DownesRegistered user14-Nov-2003 22:24 GMT
Comment 9Darrin14-Nov-2003 22:29 GMT
Comment 10Darrin14-Nov-2003 22:38 GMT
Comment 11Anonymous14-Nov-2003 22:39 GMT
Comment 12smithy14-Nov-2003 22:58 GMT
Comment 13Anonymous14-Nov-2003 23:19 GMT
Comment 14Rob14-Nov-2003 23:30 GMT
Comment 15Alkis TsapanidisRegistered user14-Nov-2003 23:33 GMT
Comment 16Darrin14-Nov-2003 23:40 GMT
Comment 17Tigger14-Nov-2003 23:48 GMT
Comment 18JoannaK14-Nov-2003 23:51 GMT
Comment 19Eva14-Nov-2003 23:55 GMT
Comment 20TheRealNapsterRegistered user15-Nov-2003 00:09 GMT
Comment 21Darrin15-Nov-2003 00:33 GMT
Comment 22stricq15-Nov-2003 00:52 GMT
Comment 23Rob15-Nov-2003 00:54 GMT
Comment 24Lando15-Nov-2003 02:55 GMT
Comment 25Anonymous15-Nov-2003 03:29 GMT
Comment 26willey15-Nov-2003 04:00 GMT
Comment 27Tigger15-Nov-2003 04:39 GMT
Comment 28Tigger15-Nov-2003 04:42 GMT
Comment 29Ronald15-Nov-2003 05:22 GMT
Comment 30SenexRegistered user15-Nov-2003 05:55 GMT
Comment 31Leif15-Nov-2003 07:54 GMT
Comment 32samface15-Nov-2003 08:04 GMT
Comment 33samface15-Nov-2003 08:07 GMT
Comment 34samface15-Nov-2003 08:44 GMT
Comment 35Lando15-Nov-2003 08:46 GMT
Comment 36Anonymous15-Nov-2003 09:39 GMT
Comment 37IanSRegistered user15-Nov-2003 10:11 GMT
Comment 38SenexRegistered user15-Nov-2003 10:44 GMT
Comment 39Alkis TsapanidisRegistered user15-Nov-2003 10:47 GMT
Comment 40SenexRegistered user15-Nov-2003 11:06 GMT
Comment 41smithy15-Nov-2003 11:09 GMT
Comment 42IanSRegistered user15-Nov-2003 11:18 GMT
Comment 43JoannaK15-Nov-2003 12:16 GMT
Comment 44IanSRegistered user15-Nov-2003 12:19 GMT
Comment 45Anonymous15-Nov-2003 12:40 GMT
Comment 46Stefan Burström15-Nov-2003 13:29 GMT
Comment 47Stefan Burström15-Nov-2003 13:32 GMT
Comment 48Ronald15-Nov-2003 14:25 GMT
Comment 49BrianK15-Nov-2003 14:26 GMT
Comment 50Don CoxRegistered user15-Nov-2003 14:40 GMT
Comment 51Don CoxRegistered user15-Nov-2003 14:49 GMT
Comment 52samface15-Nov-2003 14:52 GMT
Comment 53samface15-Nov-2003 14:59 GMT
Comment 54Darrin15-Nov-2003 15:11 GMT
Comment 55Kronos15-Nov-2003 15:17 GMT
Comment 56-15-Nov-2003 16:06 GMT
Comment 57Darrin15-Nov-2003 16:27 GMT
Comment 58Darrin15-Nov-2003 16:37 GMT
Comment 59MIKE15-Nov-2003 16:45 GMT
Comment 60MIKE15-Nov-2003 16:58 GMT
Comment 61Darrin15-Nov-2003 17:06 GMT
Comment 62-15-Nov-2003 18:01 GMT
Comment 63Darrin15-Nov-2003 18:30 GMT
Comment 64Rich Woods15-Nov-2003 19:00 GMT
Comment 65Rich Woods15-Nov-2003 19:48 GMT
Comment 66BouncingAyatollah15-Nov-2003 22:38 GMT
Comment 67brotheris16-Nov-2003 04:23 GMT
Comment 68Rich Woods16-Nov-2003 06:13 GMT
The COMPLETE civil docket for Thendic Electronics, et al v. Amiga Inc : Comment 69 of 99ANN.lu
Posted by BouncingAyatollah on 16-Nov-2003 07:02 GMT
In reply to Comment 67 (brotheris):
> I love when people use this argument. MOS runs and Warpup, Powerup and MorphOS
> native programs. And there seem to be more and more native programs. But
> interesting point is: which are OS4 programs ? Anyway, after around half year
> of OS4 release, I would expect a OS4 APIs wrapper for MOS (if there will be
> program worth it to create this wrapper).

I am aware of MorphOS native programs - I mentioned them later in my post, however the perceived "value" of MorphOS as an "Amiga clone" presently is running AmigaOS3 only apps (Warpup and PowerUp are still AmigaOS 3 apps). The future value of MorphOS is yet to be seen, a somewhat tenuous predicament for one to be spending their money on it seems, the hope that the AmigaOS3 functionality MAY be extended by way of enough native apps to match AOS4 which is a guaranteed given progression. I mentioned the likelihood of wrappers either way with "If you assume AmigaOS4-native apps get ported to MorphOS native (and vice versa) no particular disparity there."

> QNX, OpenBSD...

These were intended to be included implicitly (though not stated I admit) in the "etc." on BOTH lists, seeing as the hardware is so similar. Again though, how this situation resolves will only be known in the future. It may be that PegasOS runs more OS's but I feel that unlikely given the hardware similarities as I said.

> No AmigaDE yet (or ever if you ask me).

Less likely on the Peg if you ask me, another "more likely guaranteed progression" for the AmigaOne. This was the main point of my post though, which was in response to a question regarding why bbrv has seemingly switched from anti-AmigaDE to pro. Somehow I think he has realised it may be a distinguishing differential between the two platforms hence suddenly it became more "valuable", unless of course this IS just a "drain Amiga of all funds" ploy as others suggest, I don't know about that.

> For me it all comes down to availability and price. I see NOTHING on AOS4
> videos to make me want one. I have to want it more badly than MOS (I see a
> lot of action in this front, many programs ported).I've made my decission and
> will not buy AmigaOne, not for these kind of money. Even if OS4 would be
> released for PegasosII, it would be hard to convince me to buy it. Because
> after OS4 will be released, it will need to a lot of time to mature. I've
> listened and read enough crap about 'you can make first impression once', 'two
> weeks'. I need facts, it's my hobby and my money.

For 100s of thousands of soon to be miffed Atari ST owners it similarly came down to "availability and price". Atari could play the "Available now!" card before the A500 was released, yet what did they do when they realised the impact the A500 was going to have? Aggressive price cutting and bundling of massive amounts of software with the machine in the time they had before the A500 SOFTWARE market gained enough steam to hit them, as incentives to people who were looking at the current details rather than seeing the "bigger future picture".

> Pretty words by salesmen will not sell anything to me.

I feel that comment has succeeded the event itself. I may be wrong however, your money, your choice, as always. This isn't meant to sound attacking btw, it's just that I kind of grit my teeth for people who may have unwittingly "bought the Atari ST".

With all this tit-for-tat bitching crap flying about, the best advice I often see is "wait until both are out, compare them and decide". Sounds good to me.
Jump...
#71 Fabio Alemagna #93 brotheris
TopPrevious commentNext commentbottom
List of all comments to this article (continued)
Comment 70Jupp316-Nov-2003 07:42 GMT
Comment 71Fabio Alemagna16-Nov-2003 08:39 GMT
Comment 72Fabio Alemagna16-Nov-2003 08:42 GMT
Comment 73Amon_ReRegistered user16-Nov-2003 10:29 GMT
Comment 74cheesegrate16-Nov-2003 11:27 GMT
Comment 75samface16-Nov-2003 17:27 GMT
Comment 76takemehomegrandmaRegistered user16-Nov-2003 21:35 GMT
Comment 77Rich Woods16-Nov-2003 21:43 GMT
Comment 78Rich Woods16-Nov-2003 21:49 GMT
Comment 79Rich Woods16-Nov-2003 22:21 GMT
Comment 80samface17-Nov-2003 04:46 GMT
Comment 81samface17-Nov-2003 04:47 GMT
Comment 82samface17-Nov-2003 04:48 GMT
Comment 83samface17-Nov-2003 04:54 GMT
Comment 84Rich Woods17-Nov-2003 09:06 GMT
Comment 85Rich Woods17-Nov-2003 09:08 GMT
Comment 86Rich Woods17-Nov-2003 09:13 GMT
Comment 87Rich Woods17-Nov-2003 09:30 GMT
Comment 88takemehomegrandmaRegistered user17-Nov-2003 11:16 GMT
Comment 89samface17-Nov-2003 11:28 GMT
Comment 90samface17-Nov-2003 12:53 GMT
Comment 91samface17-Nov-2003 12:55 GMT
Comment 92samface17-Nov-2003 13:32 GMT
Comment 93brotheris17-Nov-2003 16:40 GMT
Comment 94samface17-Nov-2003 17:10 GMT
Comment 95brotheris18-Nov-2003 05:15 GMT
Comment 96samface18-Nov-2003 08:03 GMT
Comment 97brotheris18-Nov-2003 09:02 GMT
Comment 98samface18-Nov-2003 11:10 GMT
Comment 99brotheris18-Nov-2003 14:08 GMT
Back to Top