26-Apr-2024 05:21 GMT.
UNDER CONSTRUCTION
[Web] TeamAROS bounty program updatedANN.lu
Posted on 23-Jan-2004 02:30 GMT by Christophe Decanini79 comments
View flat
View list
The teamAROS has set three new objectives in their bounty program:
- PCI driver, ata device and support of fat32.
List of all comments to this article
Sorted by date, most recent at bottom
Comment 1Christophe DecaniniRegistered user23-Jan-2004 01:37 GMT
Comment 2Christophe DecaniniRegistered user23-Jan-2004 01:45 GMT
Comment 3Anonymous23-Jan-2004 06:19 GMT
Comment 4Ogun23-Jan-2004 06:39 GMT
Comment 5Olegil23-Jan-2004 07:38 GMT
Comment 6Amon_ReRegistered user23-Jan-2004 08:49 GMT
Comment 7Anonymous23-Jan-2004 08:58 GMT
Comment 8Olegil23-Jan-2004 09:24 GMT
Comment 9Anonymous23-Jan-2004 09:31 GMT
Comment 10Olegil23-Jan-2004 11:31 GMT
Comment 11Matt ParsonsRegistered user23-Jan-2004 11:37 GMT
Comment 12Olegil23-Jan-2004 12:41 GMT
Comment 13Matt ParsonsRegistered user23-Jan-2004 13:04 GMT
Comment 14Anonymous23-Jan-2004 13:31 GMT
Comment 15Anonymous23-Jan-2004 14:56 GMT
Comment 16Anonymous24-Jan-2004 00:12 GMT
Comment 17anon24-Jan-2004 05:51 GMT
Comment 18anon24-Jan-2004 06:11 GMT
Comment 19Hagge24-Jan-2004 07:22 GMT
Comment 20Chris H24-Jan-2004 09:35 GMT
Comment 21Fabio AlemagnaRegistered user24-Jan-2004 10:05 GMT
Comment 22anon24-Jan-2004 10:19 GMT
Comment 23ikirRegistered user24-Jan-2004 12:40 GMT
Comment 24Matt ParsonsRegistered user24-Jan-2004 14:25 GMT
Comment 25pixie24-Jan-2004 16:18 GMT
Comment 26smithy24-Jan-2004 16:25 GMT
Comment 27Hagge24-Jan-2004 16:31 GMT
Comment 28Hagge24-Jan-2004 16:32 GMT
Comment 293seas24-Jan-2004 19:30 GMT
Comment 303seas24-Jan-2004 19:51 GMT
Comment 31anon24-Jan-2004 21:40 GMT
Comment 32anon24-Jan-2004 21:52 GMT
Comment 33Ronald St-Maurice24-Jan-2004 22:43 GMT
TeamAROS bounty program updated : Comment 34 of 79ANN.lu
Posted by anon on 24-Jan-2004 22:59 GMT
In reply to Comment 33 (Ronald St-Maurice):
> Wrong. The move, from desktop OS to embedded OS, was a last ditch attempt to
> save the company which was burning up 1 million dollars per month.

That decision was made before they went x86. the x86/free movement was nothing more than an attempt to turn BeOS into a developement platform for BeDE *cough* I mean BeIA. That's really the only reason the x86 decision was made. Thet never got it, even when the popularity of BeOS x86 exploded, they saw those users as nothing but potential BeIA developers, rather than the desktop users they really were.

There was very little interest in BeOS PPC ever. Nobody I know even used anything other than Beos x86, and they were all willing to pay for it, but by the time anyone got around to paying for it, Beos was screwing things already, telling all the developers who *had products ready* to be released that the future of Beos as a desktop OS was dead. *BIG products* were ready to be sent out the door, and they screwed the pooch, BIG products, the likes of which would make an Amiga user cream their jeans if they were offered for AOS. Steinbeck etc. shit.

Meanwhile, they gave the OS away for free, saying "no support, no future" - and had record downloads, even moreso than most linux distro's combined at that time. Dumbasses.
Jump...
#35 anon
TopPrevious commentNext commentbottom
List of all comments to this article (continued)
Comment 35anon24-Jan-2004 23:03 GMT
Comment 36Darth_XRegistered user24-Jan-2004 23:35 GMT
Comment 37Darth_XRegistered user25-Jan-2004 00:08 GMT
Comment 38anon25-Jan-2004 00:25 GMT
Comment 39anon25-Jan-2004 00:37 GMT
Comment 40smithy25-Jan-2004 00:48 GMT
Comment 41Megol25-Jan-2004 03:03 GMT
Comment 42Seehund25-Jan-2004 03:58 GMT
Comment 43Seehund25-Jan-2004 04:01 GMT
Comment 44Seehund25-Jan-2004 04:04 GMT
Comment 45Seehund25-Jan-2004 04:06 GMT
Comment 46anon25-Jan-2004 04:55 GMT
Comment 47koan25-Jan-2004 06:23 GMT
Comment 48anon25-Jan-2004 06:55 GMT
Comment 49anon25-Jan-2004 06:57 GMT
Comment 50hammer25-Jan-2004 10:10 GMT
Comment 51hammer25-Jan-2004 10:33 GMT
Comment 52hammer25-Jan-2004 10:47 GMT
Comment 53Matt ParsonsRegistered user25-Jan-2004 12:23 GMT
Comment 54John25-Jan-2004 21:29 GMT
Comment 55Anonymous25-Jan-2004 21:48 GMT
Comment 56Anonymous25-Jan-2004 21:48 GMT
Comment 57Anonymous25-Jan-2004 21:49 GMT
Comment 58pixie26-Jan-2004 08:53 GMT
Comment 59runetrek26-Jan-2004 09:10 GMT
Comment 60Don CoxRegistered user26-Jan-2004 11:06 GMT
Comment 61Don CoxRegistered user26-Jan-2004 11:19 GMT
Comment 62Matt ParsonsRegistered user26-Jan-2004 11:41 GMT
Comment 63Don CoxRegistered user26-Jan-2004 11:50 GMT
Comment 64Alan26-Jan-2004 13:54 GMT
Comment 65Anonymous26-Jan-2004 19:21 GMT
Comment 66anon26-Jan-2004 20:09 GMT
Comment 67anon26-Jan-2004 20:11 GMT
Comment 68Seehund26-Jan-2004 20:53 GMT
Comment 69Matt ParsonsRegistered user26-Jan-2004 22:15 GMT
Comment 70anon26-Jan-2004 22:22 GMT
Comment 71EyeAm27-Jan-2004 06:11 GMT
Comment 72EyeAm27-Jan-2004 06:25 GMT
Comment 73anon27-Jan-2004 06:56 GMT
Comment 74Seehund27-Jan-2004 07:44 GMT
Comment 75Olegil27-Jan-2004 11:27 GMT
Comment 76Ogun27-Jan-2004 12:14 GMT
Comment 77Seehund27-Jan-2004 16:52 GMT
Comment 78EyeAm27-Jan-2004 19:17 GMT
Comment 79EyeAm27-Jan-2004 19:40 GMT
Back to Top