26-Apr-2024 23:17 GMT.
UNDER CONSTRUCTION
[News] Amiga Inc. Has Sold AmigaOS RightsANN.lu
Posted on 16-Mar-2004 01:11 GMT by Anonymouse124 comments
View flat
View list
Read the story in its entirety here.
List of all comments to this article
Sorted by date, most recent at bottom
Comment 1bluvi16-Mar-2004 00:15 GMT
Comment 2Anonymous16-Mar-2004 00:19 GMT
Comment 3Anonymous16-Mar-2004 00:24 GMT
Comment 4HD16-Mar-2004 00:25 GMT
Comment 5Doobrey16-Mar-2004 00:25 GMT
Comment 6gary_c16-Mar-2004 00:28 GMT
Comment 7Anonymous16-Mar-2004 00:30 GMT
Comment 8Doobrey16-Mar-2004 00:40 GMT
Comment 9Anonymous16-Mar-2004 00:40 GMT
Comment 10dodot16-Mar-2004 00:50 GMT
Comment 11Atheist216-Mar-2004 00:52 GMT
Comment 12hnl_dkRegistered user16-Mar-2004 00:53 GMT
Comment 13Bill Hoggett16-Mar-2004 01:01 GMT
Comment 14Anonymous16-Mar-2004 01:03 GMT
Comment 15gary_c16-Mar-2004 01:05 GMT
Comment 16Johan Rönnblom16-Mar-2004 01:06 GMT
Comment 17Anonymous16-Mar-2004 01:07 GMT
Comment 18Nate DownesRegistered user16-Mar-2004 01:27 GMT
Comment 19Darrin16-Mar-2004 01:28 GMT
Comment 20Darrin16-Mar-2004 01:29 GMT
Comment 21Darrin16-Mar-2004 01:30 GMT
Comment 22Doobrey16-Mar-2004 01:35 GMT
Comment 23Darrin16-Mar-2004 01:40 GMT
Comment 24Anonymous16-Mar-2004 01:41 GMT
Comment 25gary_c16-Mar-2004 01:43 GMT
Comment 26Graham_nli16-Mar-2004 01:53 GMT
Comment 27Bill Hoggett16-Mar-2004 01:58 GMT
Comment 28Graham_nli16-Mar-2004 02:00 GMT
Comment 29gary_c16-Mar-2004 02:16 GMT
Comment 30Darrin16-Mar-2004 02:32 GMT
Comment 31Darrin16-Mar-2004 02:35 GMT
Comment 32Anonymous16-Mar-2004 02:51 GMT
Comment 33Anonymous16-Mar-2004 02:53 GMT
Comment 34Pimploch16-Mar-2004 02:58 GMT
Comment 35Anonymous16-Mar-2004 03:01 GMT
Comment 36Graham_nli16-Mar-2004 03:02 GMT
Comment 37Nate DownesRegistered user16-Mar-2004 03:09 GMT
Comment 38Darrin16-Mar-2004 03:19 GMT
Comment 39Kronos16-Mar-2004 03:19 GMT
Comment 40hooligan/dcsRegistered user16-Mar-2004 03:30 GMT
Comment 41Anonymous16-Mar-2004 03:37 GMT
Comment 42Graham_nli16-Mar-2004 03:43 GMT
Comment 43gary_c16-Mar-2004 03:47 GMT
Comment 44Anonymous16-Mar-2004 04:09 GMT
Comment 45gary_c16-Mar-2004 04:29 GMT
Comment 46the man in the shadows16-Mar-2004 04:30 GMT
Comment 47EyeAm16-Mar-2004 04:52 GMT
Comment 48Graham_nli16-Mar-2004 04:55 GMT
Comment 49the man in the shadows16-Mar-2004 05:02 GMT
Comment 50Graham_nli16-Mar-2004 05:03 GMT
Comment 51the man in the shadows16-Mar-2004 05:08 GMT
Comment 52EyeAm16-Mar-2004 05:09 GMT
Comment 53T_Bone16-Mar-2004 05:14 GMT
Comment 54T_Bone16-Mar-2004 05:15 GMT
Comment 55gary_c16-Mar-2004 05:23 GMT
Comment 56Graham_nli16-Mar-2004 05:37 GMT
Comment 57Anonymous16-Mar-2004 05:49 GMT
Comment 58Graham_nli16-Mar-2004 05:53 GMT
Comment 59Anonymous16-Mar-2004 06:01 GMT
Comment 60Mikey_C16-Mar-2004 06:09 GMT
Comment 61Graham_nli16-Mar-2004 06:11 GMT
Comment 62Anonymous16-Mar-2004 06:16 GMT
Comment 63Graham_nli16-Mar-2004 06:17 GMT
Comment 64Mikey_C16-Mar-2004 06:18 GMT
Comment 65the man in the shadows16-Mar-2004 06:18 GMT
Comment 66Kjetil16-Mar-2004 06:42 GMT
Comment 67Jupp316-Mar-2004 06:48 GMT
Comment 68gary_c16-Mar-2004 06:55 GMT
Comment 69gary_c16-Mar-2004 07:00 GMT
Comment 70Darrin16-Mar-2004 07:03 GMT
Comment 71Eva16-Mar-2004 07:06 GMT
Comment 72Mikey_C16-Mar-2004 07:08 GMT
Comment 73EyeAm16-Mar-2004 07:12 GMT
Comment 74Graham_nli16-Mar-2004 07:14 GMT
Comment 75Darrin16-Mar-2004 07:21 GMT
Comment 76Graham_nli16-Mar-2004 07:31 GMT
Comment 77Anonymous16-Mar-2004 07:32 GMT
Comment 78Darrin16-Mar-2004 07:34 GMT
Comment 79takemehomegrandmaRegistered user16-Mar-2004 09:00 GMT
Comment 80takemehomegrandmaRegistered user16-Mar-2004 09:09 GMT
Comment 81Amon_ReRegistered user16-Mar-2004 09:15 GMT
Comment 82Amon_ReRegistered user16-Mar-2004 09:17 GMT
Comment 83priest16-Mar-2004 09:22 GMT
Comment 84priest16-Mar-2004 09:24 GMT
Comment 85takemehomegrandmaRegistered user16-Mar-2004 09:35 GMT
Comment 86Amon_ReRegistered user16-Mar-2004 09:51 GMT
Comment 87takemehomegrandmaRegistered user16-Mar-2004 10:04 GMT
Comment 88takemehomegrandmaRegistered user16-Mar-2004 10:14 GMT
Comment 89Don CoxRegistered user16-Mar-2004 10:16 GMT
Comment 90Don CoxRegistered user16-Mar-2004 10:20 GMT
Comment 91takemehomegrandmaRegistered user16-Mar-2004 10:41 GMT
Comment 92Amon_ReRegistered user16-Mar-2004 10:49 GMT
Comment 93takemehomegrandmaRegistered user16-Mar-2004 10:58 GMT
Comment 94Graham_nli16-Mar-2004 11:12 GMT
Comment 95Amon_ReRegistered user16-Mar-2004 11:15 GMT
Comment 96muhahahaha16-Mar-2004 11:36 GMT
Comment 97Don CoxRegistered user16-Mar-2004 12:36 GMT
Comment 98Don CoxRegistered user16-Mar-2004 12:39 GMT
Comment 99Don CoxRegistered user16-Mar-2004 12:41 GMT
Comment 100Don CoxRegistered user16-Mar-2004 12:46 GMT
Comment 101takemehomegrandmaRegistered user16-Mar-2004 13:10 GMT
Comment 102takemehomegrandmaRegistered user16-Mar-2004 13:11 GMT
Comment 103Ketzer16-Mar-2004 13:15 GMT
Comment 104takemehomegrandmaRegistered user16-Mar-2004 13:41 GMT
Comment 105Anonymous16-Mar-2004 14:27 GMT
Comment 106Ketzer16-Mar-2004 14:40 GMT
Comment 107Ketzer16-Mar-2004 14:57 GMT
Amiga Inc. Has Sold AmigaOS Rights : Comment 108 of 124ANN.lu
Posted by takemehomegrandma on 16-Mar-2004 15:11 GMT
In reply to Comment 105 (Anonymous):
OK, I'll not reply to the other one, since I promised I would stop teasing him!
;-)

But I am amazed that you people are STILL trying to claim that Garry Hare *was not* put in charge over Amiga Inc to save what could be saved and make the best out of the situation!? Still! Today!

**Now when we are beginning to see the results of his efforts!**

-*WOW*-

:-O

Well, let's look at the *high res* scan of the business card, since some people are seriously claiming the small one to be a fake (which is kind of hilarious by itself, talk about paranoia, haha!)

http://users.kymp.net/p305543a/pics/garry_hare_biz_card.png

Save that and magnify that even further!

I would also like you people to stop saying things like:
Amiga: He's not the ne..., I mean, putting an equal sign between Amiga (as a platform) and Amiga Inc (as a burst dot-com dream bouble). "Amiga is back in court", "people are doing bad things to Amiga", etc, when it's not the platform you are talking about but some VC junkies trying to keep up appearance! Not that I really care about "the name" anymore (rather the opposite, actually), but some people do, and to purpously misuse this way of writing might delude weak-minded people to actually *believe* (there are *lots* of weak-minded believers around) that Amiga Inc is the same thing as the platform that is the reason to why we are all still here, and project the beauty of the Amiga platform onto the filthy corpse of Amiga Inc! Even you people should see the inappropriateness in this by now, after todays happenings! Right?
Jump...
#109 Anonymous #111 takemehomegrandma
TopPrevious commentNext commentbottom
List of all comments to this article (continued)
Comment 109Anonymous16-Mar-2004 15:22 GMT
Comment 110takemehomegrandmaRegistered user16-Mar-2004 15:37 GMT
Comment 111takemehomegrandmaRegistered user16-Mar-2004 15:39 GMT
Comment 112Anonymous16-Mar-2004 15:42 GMT
Comment 113Anonymous16-Mar-2004 15:44 GMT
Comment 114Tigger16-Mar-2004 18:38 GMT
Comment 115Doobrey17-Mar-2004 00:47 GMT
Comment 116Doobrey17-Mar-2004 01:06 GMT
Comment 117Ketzer17-Mar-2004 06:06 GMT
Comment 118Graham_nli17-Mar-2004 06:14 GMT
Comment 119The Lesbian Avengers17-Mar-2004 09:30 GMT
Comment 120Tigger18-Mar-2004 07:19 GMT
Comment 121Tigger18-Mar-2004 07:28 GMT
Comment 122Ketzer19-Mar-2004 14:30 GMT
Comment 123Ketzer19-Mar-2004 14:32 GMT
Comment 124Gregg19-Mar-2004 15:26 GMT
Back to Top