15-Jun-2024 17:05 GMT.
[Web] RISC OS vs. AmigaOSANN.lu
Posted on 03-May-2004 03:42 GMT by Ronald St-Maurice22 comments
View flat
View list
Are we so dissimilar? If you asked us to list the troubling issues facing the RISC OS platform right now, the lack of more modern hardware support and the OS development split between Castle and RISCOS Ltd. would probably be there, right at the top, beating other problems like the USB split between Castle and Simtec and the gradual slowdown in software development... More...
List of all comments to this article
Sorted by date, most recent at bottom
Comment 1Ole-Egil03-May-2004 11:07 GMT
Comment 2Sammy Nordström03-May-2004 12:25 GMT
Comment 3itix03-May-2004 13:04 GMT
Comment 4pixie03-May-2004 13:09 GMT
Comment 5Amon_ReRegistered user03-May-2004 13:27 GMT
Comment 6Kjetil03-May-2004 13:35 GMT
Comment 7JKD03-May-2004 13:44 GMT
Comment 8Don CoxRegistered user03-May-2004 14:07 GMT
RISC OS vs. AmigaOS : Comment 9 of 22ANN.lu
Posted by Graham_nli on 03-May-2004 14:50 GMT
The few Acorn fans at school were such snobs... they never worked out why there were 2 people sitting around the Acorn and 10 around the Amigas.

The Acorn did have a lot more processing power than the Amiga, its little 8MHz ARM processor was a better processor than a 7.3MHz 68000. Sadly the graphics were simple framebuffer as far as I recall. 8 channel audio though, but I don't know how much work the audio chip did compared with Paula.

I still think that C= should have made a more powerful version of the A500 back in 1988 or so to sell along side for a couple of hundred quid more. Full 1MB memory and a processor that was at least twice as fast. It would have provided the "drool" machine for people that could only afford the A500, it would have provided a higher spec machine for games that needed more processing power (3d games for example) and the cost would have come down. Because the faster processor version existed, games would have been written for it, driving demand for the faster machine, and creating a necessary upgrade routine, like with current PCs. The A600 and A1200 were too little, too late.
TopPrevious commentNext commentbottom
List of all comments to this article (continued)
Comment 10Darth_XRegistered user03-May-2004 14:56 GMT
Comment 11Christophe DecaniniRegistered user03-May-2004 15:10 GMT
Comment 12minator03-May-2004 15:27 GMT
Comment 13Kolbjørn Barmen03-May-2004 16:25 GMT
Comment 14Joe "Floid" Kanowitz03-May-2004 16:57 GMT
Comment 15Ronald St-Maurice03-May-2004 17:14 GMT
Comment 16Seehund03-May-2004 17:36 GMT
Comment 17Graham_nli03-May-2004 20:21 GMT
Comment 18Hammer04-May-2004 08:16 GMT
Comment 19Raffaele05-May-2004 06:40 GMT
Comment 20dirty dave05-May-2004 09:27 GMT
Comment 21Kjetil05-May-2004 19:08 GMT
Comment 22NutsAboutAmiga23-Jun-2004 12:35 GMT
Back to Top