30-Jan-2023 04:35 GMT.
[News] U.S. Senate's High Tech Task Force Visit ODW AssemblyANN.lu
Posted on 26-Aug-2004 12:00 GMT by Balisto (Edited on 2004-08-26 14:23:34 GMT by Christophe Decanini)27 comments
View flat
View list
The Senate Republican HTTF's (High Tech Task Force) Jesse Wadhams (Technology Policy Counsel to the Chairman) visited the assembly production of the Open Desktop Workstation 24 Aug 2004. See the Press Release http://www.genesi.lu/press.php?date=20040825 Genesi Photos: http://www.pegasosppc.com/gallery.php?id=111 HTTF Weebsite: http://republican.senate.gov/httf/new.htm
List of all comments to this article
Sorted by date, most recent at bottom
Comment 1takemehomegrandmaRegistered user26-Aug-2004 10:45 GMT
Comment 2Emeric SH26-Aug-2004 11:27 GMT
Comment 3Emeric SH26-Aug-2004 11:28 GMT
Comment 4priest26-Aug-2004 12:01 GMT
Comment 5priest26-Aug-2004 12:02 GMT
Comment 6Anonymous26-Aug-2004 12:16 GMT
Comment 7Emeric SH26-Aug-2004 12:34 GMT
Comment 8Christophe DecaniniRegistered user26-Aug-2004 14:38 GMT
Comment 9Rafo26-Aug-2004 16:34 GMT
Comment 10Amon_ReRegistered user26-Aug-2004 18:27 GMT
Comment 11Darth_XRegistered user26-Aug-2004 18:52 GMT
Comment 12Wayne Dresing PhD26-Aug-2004 22:32 GMT
Comment 13Anonymous26-Aug-2004 22:49 GMT
Comment 14JoannaK27-Aug-2004 01:09 GMT
Comment 15Anonymous27-Aug-2004 04:29 GMT
Comment 16Joe "Floid" Kanowitz27-Aug-2004 06:32 GMT
U.S. Senate's High Tech Task Force Visit ODW Assembly : Comment 17 of 27ANN.lu
Posted by corpse on 27-Aug-2004 15:13 GMT
In reply to Comment 8 (Christophe Decanini):
"The advantage of having a platform like the Pegasos (or even better a set top box) is that you can install a special optimised distribution for your platform."

replace pegasos with a i386 based arch(i486,i586,k7,p4), or another arch and that statement is just as valid. The difference being on i386 based Arch's A: GCC's optimisations are fairly mature (compaired with other platforms) B: The kernel actually supports cutting edge hardware in a stable fashion (i.e. you can do a hdparm -d1 /dev/xxx without corrupting your fs or panicking the kernel) C: the price to performance ratio means you can build a system that running completely unoptimised will still walk all over a pegasos but costing far less D: etc etc

Then we have platforms like the broadcom SOC's appearing in recent routers (like my fine linksys WRT54GS). The advantage isn't that you can optimise for it.. the main advantage is that you have basically a whole, albeit "slow", linux system in a "cheap" ic. Why bother investing time in a design like the Pegasos when you can build around the cheap and fast i386 arch or a SOC?

IMHO I think the name Open Desktop blah blah is a bit misleading, the use of Open suggests that I could get all the docs, code etc for this thing but I doubt that's the reality. They're seriously going to have to come up with some better ideas than catchy buzzword names or set-top boxen to move out of the hobby market.
#18 Anonymous
TopPrevious commentNext commentbottom
List of all comments to this article (continued)
Comment 18Anonymous27-Aug-2004 19:31 GMT
Comment 19Anonymous27-Aug-2004 19:40 GMT
Comment 20Anonymous27-Aug-2004 19:46 GMT
Comment 21corpse27-Aug-2004 21:21 GMT
Comment 22Joe "Floid" Kanowitz28-Aug-2004 05:20 GMT
Comment 23Anonymous28-Aug-2004 06:35 GMT
Comment 24Anonymous28-Aug-2004 06:50 GMT
Comment 25Joe "Floid" Kanowitz28-Aug-2004 08:15 GMT
Comment 26Andreas_Wolf28-Aug-2004 12:11 GMT
Comment 27mm11-Oct-2004 19:07 GMT
Back to Top