[News] U.S. Senate's High Tech Task Force Visit ODW Assembly | ANN.lu |
|
List of all comments to this articleSorted by date, most recent at bottom |
Comment 1 | takemehomegrandma | Registered user | 26-Aug-2004 10:45 GMT |
Comment 2 | Emeric SH | | 26-Aug-2004 11:27 GMT |
Comment 3 | Emeric SH | | 26-Aug-2004 11:28 GMT |
Comment 4 | priest | | 26-Aug-2004 12:01 GMT |
Comment 5 | priest | | 26-Aug-2004 12:02 GMT |
Comment 6 | Anonymous | | 26-Aug-2004 12:16 GMT |
Comment 7 | Emeric SH | | 26-Aug-2004 12:34 GMT |
Comment 8 | Christophe Decanini | Registered user | 26-Aug-2004 14:38 GMT |
Comment 9 | Rafo | | 26-Aug-2004 16:34 GMT |
Comment 10 | Amon_Re | Registered user | 26-Aug-2004 18:27 GMT |
Comment 11 | Darth_X | Registered user | 26-Aug-2004 18:52 GMT |
Comment 12 | Wayne Dresing PhD | | 26-Aug-2004 22:32 GMT |
Comment 13 | Anonymous | | 26-Aug-2004 22:49 GMT |
Comment 14 | JoannaK | | 27-Aug-2004 01:09 GMT |
Comment 15 | Anonymous | | 27-Aug-2004 04:29 GMT |
Comment 16 | Joe "Floid" Kanowitz | | 27-Aug-2004 06:32 GMT |
|
U.S. Senate's High Tech Task Force Visit ODW Assembly : Comment 17 of 27 | ANN.lu |
Posted by corpse on 27-Aug-2004 15:13 GMT | In reply to Comment 8 (Christophe Decanini): "The advantage of having a platform like the Pegasos (or even better a set top box) is that you can install a special optimised distribution for your platform."
replace pegasos with a i386 based arch(i486,i586,k7,p4), or another arch and that statement is just as valid. The difference being on i386 based Arch's A: GCC's optimisations are fairly mature (compaired with other platforms) B: The kernel actually supports cutting edge hardware in a stable fashion (i.e. you can do a hdparm -d1 /dev/xxx without corrupting your fs or panicking the kernel) C: the price to performance ratio means you can build a system that running completely unoptimised will still walk all over a pegasos but costing far less D: etc etc
Then we have platforms like the broadcom SOC's appearing in recent routers (like my fine linksys WRT54GS). The advantage isn't that you can optimise for it.. the main advantage is that you have basically a whole, albeit "slow", linux system in a "cheap" ic. Why bother investing time in a design like the Pegasos when you can build around the cheap and fast i386 arch or a SOC?
IMHO I think the name Open Desktop blah blah is a bit misleading, the use of Open suggests that I could get all the docs, code etc for this thing but I doubt that's the reality. They're seriously going to have to come up with some better ideas than catchy buzzword names or set-top boxen to move out of the hobby market. |
|
List of all comments to this article (continued) |
|
- User Menu
-
- About ANN archives
- The ANN archives is powered by #AmigaZeux. It was updated daily (news last: 22-Oct-2004; comments last: 18-May-2005).
ANN.lu was created, previously owned and maintained by Christian Kemp, www.ckemp.com.
- Contribute
- Not possible at this time!
- Search ANN archives
- Advanced search
- Hosting
- ANN.lu was hosted by Dreamhost. Sign up through this link, mention "ckemp" as referrer and he will get a 10% commission on any account you purchase.
Please show your appreciation for any past, present and future work on ANN.lu by making a contribution via PayPal.
|