26-Apr-2024 05:52 GMT.
UNDER CONSTRUCTION
[Forum] A big step forward in cross-platform computingANN.lu
Posted on 15-Sep-2004 22:32 GMT by Gary Goldberg39 comments
View flat
View list
By Leander Kahney 02:00 AM Sep. 13, 2004 PT A Silicon Valley startup claims to have cracked one of most elusive goals of the software industry: a near-universal emulator that allows software developed for one platform to run on any other, with almost no performance hit. Transitive Corp. of Los Gatos, California, claims its QuickTransit software allows applications to run "transparently" on multiple hardware platforms, including Macs, PCs, and numerous servers and mainframes... http://www.wired.com/news/technology/0,1282,64914,00.html?tw=wn_6techhead
List of all comments to this article
Sorted by date, most recent at bottom
Comment 1Lando15-Sep-2004 23:18 GMT
Comment 2Andrew Korn15-Sep-2004 23:27 GMT
A big step forward in cross-platform computing : Comment 3 of 39ANN.lu
Posted by Joe "Floid" Kanowitz on 16-Sep-2004 01:11 GMT
In reply to Comment 2 (Andrew Korn):
Isn't Transitive the company that were touting a dymanic translation system under the name "Dynamite" a few years back? It was discussed somewhat around these parts when Intent / AmigaDE were more of a hot topic.

Perhaps you're thinking of the Dynamo research project from HP?

Anyhow, I can believe they peak around '80%,' whatever 80% exactly means (lower numbers are, of course, more plausible). This isn't rocket science, it's just the equivalent of WINE combined with a CPU emulator/translator someone's bothered to optimize. Why wasn't it done before? Probably because it's much less of a pain in the a** to go out and buy hardware.

Meanwhile, it's not like this is a perfect solution or anything. UNIX-to-UNIX is relatively easy (hey, comes free in every BSD), the novelty being, again, whatever this miracle bytecode translator they claim to have... On the other hand, people have been struggling to reimplement the Windows API for years (WINE, PE2LX/Odin), and you'll notice that while they can *demo* it, they sure aren't selling it just yet. OS X poses a similar challenge, as comes to dragging over the whole shebang of Quartz.

Figure this is mostly a way for corporates to migrate off 'dead' platforms (PA-RISC, Alpha, some flavors of #?Sparc... PDP-n?) and less-than-kicking OSes (OSF?) to the de-facto AMD64/[Linux|BSD] standard, while reaping some performance over crappier emulators (assuming reasonably non-hairy code). And that, given some revenue from that, they *should* be able to spit out Windows and Mac support within a reasonable timeframe, but the compatibility lists will be somewhat limited and the modules will be maintainership hell.
Jump...
#22 JoannaK
TopPrevious commentNext commentbottom
List of all comments to this article (continued)
Comment 4Joe "Floid" Kanowitz16-Sep-2004 01:18 GMT
Comment 5Anonymous16-Sep-2004 01:46 GMT
Comment 6AMC25816-Sep-2004 03:17 GMT
Comment 7Chris Perver16-Sep-2004 05:50 GMT
Comment 8Anonymous16-Sep-2004 06:16 GMT
Comment 9bennymee16-Sep-2004 06:28 GMT
Comment 10Don CoxRegistered user16-Sep-2004 09:38 GMT
Comment 11miksuh16-Sep-2004 12:04 GMT
Comment 12Don CoxRegistered user16-Sep-2004 13:43 GMT
Comment 13Fabio AlemagnaRegistered user16-Sep-2004 13:45 GMT
Comment 14Anonymous16-Sep-2004 14:41 GMT
Comment 15miksuh16-Sep-2004 14:44 GMT
Comment 16sutro16-Sep-2004 17:06 GMT
Comment 17Fabio AlemagnaRegistered user16-Sep-2004 17:57 GMT
Comment 18Fabio AlemagnaRegistered user16-Sep-2004 18:00 GMT
Comment 19sutro16-Sep-2004 18:55 GMT
Comment 20Fabio AlemagnaRegistered user16-Sep-2004 20:41 GMT
Comment 21Joe "Floid" Kanowitz16-Sep-2004 23:39 GMT
Comment 22JoannaK17-Sep-2004 02:40 GMT
Comment 23Johan "Hagge" Krüger-Haglert17-Sep-2004 04:35 GMT
Comment 24sutro17-Sep-2004 13:32 GMT
Comment 25Fabio AlemagnaRegistered user17-Sep-2004 14:06 GMT
Comment 26Kolbjørn Barmen18-Sep-2004 11:03 GMT
Comment 27Fabio AlemagnaRegistered user18-Sep-2004 14:31 GMT
Comment 283seas19-Sep-2004 15:42 GMT
Comment 29noggin20-Sep-2004 08:51 GMT
Comment 303seas20-Sep-2004 10:09 GMT
Comment 31noggin20-Sep-2004 10:32 GMT
Comment 32Don CoxRegistered user20-Sep-2004 14:10 GMT
Comment 33Don CoxRegistered user20-Sep-2004 14:14 GMT
Comment 34Ben Hern20-Sep-2004 17:39 GMT
Comment 35MarkTime20-Sep-2004 18:25 GMT
Comment 36noggin21-Sep-2004 05:28 GMT
Comment 37noggin21-Sep-2004 05:35 GMT
Comment 38Joe "Floid" Kanowitz21-Sep-2004 08:11 GMT
Comment 39Joe "Floid" Kanowitz21-Sep-2004 08:24 GMT
Back to Top