27-Apr-2024 17:50 GMT.
UNDER CONSTRUCTION
[Forum] kmos.com domain name expiresANN.lu
Posted on 30-Sep-2004 22:42 GMT by 46 comments
View flat
View list
Creation date: 29 Sep 2000 17:36:10 Expiration date: 29 Sep 2004 17:36:10 http://www.betterwhois.com/bwhois.cgi?domain=KMOS.COM
List of all comments to this article
Sorted by date, most recent at bottom
Comment 1Dan Thaning30-Sep-2004 20:54 GMT
Comment 2JoannaK30-Sep-2004 20:56 GMT
Comment 3opi30-Sep-2004 21:03 GMT
Comment 4JoannaK30-Sep-2004 21:07 GMT
Comment 5opi30-Sep-2004 21:11 GMT
Comment 6Dan Thaning30-Sep-2004 21:16 GMT
Comment 7JoannaK30-Sep-2004 21:18 GMT
Comment 8Dan Thaning30-Sep-2004 21:19 GMT
Comment 9Richard Drummond30-Sep-2004 22:31 GMT
Comment 10opi30-Sep-2004 22:41 GMT
kmos.com domain name expires : Comment 11 of 46ANN.lu
Posted by gary_c on 30-Sep-2004 22:41 GMT
In reply to Comment 9 (Richard Drummond):
Sounds to me like your grasping at straws. Even if KMOS didn't have an immediate need for a web site, they should keep the domain for future use and to keep it out of the hands of others. Wouldn't you? This is, of course, *if* the KMOS name and corporate identity have any value at all. I don't think buying Amiga, Inc. has any direct relevance. Garry Hare made it clear that KMOS and Amiga, Inc. have separate product lines, markets, and so on, so Amiga's having its own web site shouldn't affect KMOS one way or the other.

Of course there may be a great logic underlying everything KMOS has done so far, yet to be revealed. So I wouldn't want to jump to conclusions that they are inept or dishonest. ;-)

-- gary_c
Jump...
#13 Richard Drummond #26 John Block
TopPrevious commentNext commentbottom
List of all comments to this article (continued)
Comment 12Amiga market is dying30-Sep-2004 22:46 GMT
Comment 13Richard Drummond30-Sep-2004 22:50 GMT
Comment 14gary_c30-Sep-2004 23:09 GMT
Comment 15gary_c30-Sep-2004 23:16 GMT
Comment 16Richard Drummond30-Sep-2004 23:22 GMT
Comment 17Darth_XRegistered user30-Sep-2004 23:30 GMT
Comment 18Wayne Dresing, PhD30-Sep-2004 23:35 GMT
Comment 19gary_c30-Sep-2004 23:38 GMT
Comment 20gary_c30-Sep-2004 23:40 GMT
Comment 21JoannaK30-Sep-2004 23:44 GMT
Comment 22Richard Drummond01-Oct-2004 00:42 GMT
Comment 23Anonymous01-Oct-2004 04:39 GMT
Comment 24Anonymous01-Oct-2004 05:26 GMT
Comment 25JoannaK01-Oct-2004 05:37 GMT
Comment 26John Block01-Oct-2004 06:49 GMT
Comment 27John Block01-Oct-2004 07:02 GMT
Comment 28Chris Perver01-Oct-2004 10:18 GMT
Comment 29Damien01-Oct-2004 10:38 GMT
Comment 30Graham_nli01-Oct-2004 11:20 GMT
Comment 31Graham_nli01-Oct-2004 11:23 GMT
Comment 32Gregg01-Oct-2004 12:01 GMT
Comment 33priest01-Oct-2004 13:11 GMT
Comment 34Andreas Wolf01-Oct-2004 14:48 GMT
Comment 35JoannaK01-Oct-2004 15:31 GMT
Comment 36JoannaK01-Oct-2004 15:54 GMT
Comment 37Ron Jeremy01-Oct-2004 17:56 GMT
Comment 38Graham_nli01-Oct-2004 18:06 GMT
Comment 39Graham_nli01-Oct-2004 18:09 GMT
Comment 40JoannaK01-Oct-2004 19:12 GMT
Comment 41Gregg01-Oct-2004 20:26 GMT
Comment 42Dan Thaning01-Oct-2004 22:39 GMT
Comment 43Anonymous01-Oct-2004 22:47 GMT
Comment 44Graham_nli02-Oct-2004 10:17 GMT
Comment 45pixie03-Oct-2004 16:50 GMT
Comment 46priest04-Oct-2004 10:40 GMT
Back to Top