27-Apr-2024 01:18 GMT.
UNDER CONSTRUCTION
Anonymous, there are 233 items in your selection (but only 33 shown due to limitation) [1 - 50] [51 - 100] [101 - 150] [151 - 200] [201 - 233]
[Forum] "party on:-)" (R.S.)ANN.lu
Posted on 02-Oct-2001 19:56 GMT by Martin Heine233 comments
View flat
View list
(Before someone again complains that I'm sharing my opinion "everywhere": I just decided to paste here what I wrote in comp.sys.amiga.misc because of Christian's call for articles.)
The article contains quick and dirty translations of comments made yesterday and today by Mr. Haage and Ralph Schmidt at amiga-news.de, since I thought non-german-speakers might be interested in this, too. Newsgroup-article #1:


To try to compensate at least a little bit the advantages of those Amigans who speak German (and therefore often get easier to rumours, facts, etc., because of the importance of german companies and individuals for the Amiga-market), I thought it might be useful to translate a few statements made at amiga-news.de today.

While Eyetech and H&P accuse each other for the A1/AOS4-delays (one says the hardware is missing, one says the OS4 is missing), Mr. Haage made (among others) the following comments (no warranty for the translation!):


[Mr. Haage (H) comments some rumours (R)]

H: "The interest in OS4.0 we have NEVER lost. But we've never been and are not convinced of the profitability of the project if the concepts won't be changed."

R: "They (H&P) are just the executing organ, all decisions are made by Amiga Inc."

H: "Correct. [...]"

R: "Amiga Inc. displays regarding Communication with their partners "certain" deficits."

H: "Deficits is nicely said. But it's correct!"

R: "Failing to come / insufficient payments from Amiga Inc."

H: "Before payments could be made, contracts have to be made. That far, however, we aren't yet. Regarding which I clearly want to emphasize that WE do not delay."

[...]

H: "To be able to be partners to an agreement, one needs contracts - and that is not Amiga Inc.'s strong point."


[Another comment from Mr. Haage]

R: "Is the date told by Alan Redhouse [Eyetech] for the completion of OS4.0 ("november, but probably not the 1st") possible in your opinion?"

H: "Only if it would be right now possible to work towards that date. But the conditions for this don't exist. Maybe a wonder happens, but I don't expect it."


No wonder that those like me, who've been suspicious regarding AI in favour of MorphOS/Pegasos for some time already, unfortunately feel confirmed more and more. Also no wonder that Ralph Schmidt is enjoying this soap opera from AI, H&P and Eyetech, his first comment has been the one quoted as the subject: "party on:-)".


So, after translating Mr. Haage's point of view, I'll also think I should quote from one of Ralph's comments, too. He (RS) answers to a comment by Mr. Haage (JH):

JH: "In an exclusive x86 AmigaOS version we aren't interested."

RS: "No? :-) Do you think we don't get what you proposed internally already in August? :-)"

[...]

RS: "As you've been also told already by a person from Amiga Inc. some monthes ago... you have no future as Amiga OS vendor."


My personal guess is that the main problem seems to be Amiga Inc., i.e. especially their lack of money. So after them already given up on their plans regarding DE being their future OS many monthes ago, it seems their plan to survive as a content vendor for PDAs seems to be not that successful, too (Alan Redhouse, too, does confirm in his statement that AI still has the already known financial problems). If companies like H&P do speak that way about AI already in the public as Mr. Haage did today at amiga-news.de (I just translated a little bit of it), I exprect the worst regarding AI's future.

Therefore it really seems the Amiga-market's future might be just those two ones Ralph outlined: an emulation-based x86 one by H&P and the PPC one covered by MorphOS.



-----8<--------

Newsgroup-article #2:

Some "second helping" - the "party" goes on:

(Again no warranty for the 'quick and dirty' translation.)


Michael Garlich (Titan Computer) in reply to Mr. Haage:

"You should restrain yourself on your statements against Mr. Schmidt! Only you are to blame for the current situation - if you had actually shown your much propagated readiness for cooperation last year in september, it would not have been come that far. Despite all adverse things Mr. Schmidt contrary to you had been willing to cooperate under leadership of Amiga Inc. !!!"


And another reply by Ralph to Mr. Haage:

"[...] You operate on other levels which the normal user doesn't notice. (dealers, influence on Amiga Inc., threats with licences, internal mailing lists, influence on a certain person and a certain company)"



-----8<--------

Newsgroup-article #3:

I think balance requires me to continue the translation at least one more time, i.e. especially regarding the repeated offer below by Mr. Haage to try to come to a cooperation. Of course everyone draws his own conclusions, H&P-fans may say "didn't I tell you, just Ralph is the bad guy" (although there's on the other hand the, today repeated, version by for example Mr. Garlich who said that Mr. Haage would have prevented exactly this last year), while the other side may say he's just lying or trying another trick. My personal conclusion is that Mr. Haage may just get cold feet because of the apparently very bad financial situation at AI and its consequences for another Amiga-PPC-future besides MorphOS.

Well, here again some quick and dirty translations from the very same thread of comments at amiga-news.de as before; again, no warranty.


1. Mr. Haage:

He suggests to accept an invitation made partly humorously by amiga-news.de's Petra Struck to Mr. Haage and Ralph to meet at her home for a dinner and try to come to an agreement.

(But Ralph did already say in a comment before he'd never again cooperate with Mr. Haage, because of the well-known history and because H&P would just have nothing to offer that would be of interest for the bplan/Morphos-crew. (Although I think Ralph underestimates the value of "the name", but on the other hand I don't know how much, if any, influence H&P has regarding this.))


2. Ralph:

(It has been said before that by saying H&P (and Hyperion) would have nothing to offer the MorphOS-team could be interested in, they would cut out "StormC4, Arteffect, Genesis, Olsen's TCP/IP Stack, OS 3.9 licences" and Hyperion's products.)

" 1) We have with the PPC-MorphOS-GCC our own development system, [...].
2) I wouldn't know what's that unique with ArtEffect. [...]
3) Genesis is a GUI surface and the TCP/IP stack belongs to Tomi Ollila, which we do also have as a PPC version.
4) Olsen's TCP/IP stack is controlled by Olsen and nobody else. And we do have a *very* good relationship with Olaf.
5) Amiga users do already own 3.1, 3.5 or 3.9 and it's left up to them of they continue to use it until a completely new WB exists.
6) MorphOS as AmigaOS 4.x was massively opposed by Hyperion since november 2000 and in summer it was said that they'd never would be porting Warp3d to MorphOS, when Amiga Inc. suggested them this. This decision is left up to them for what they want to develop something... The consequence is just that they don't play any role in our plans. Therefore we plan an own 3D solution. Warp3d is only that long important as new games support it.
[...]
9) As I said already... H&P are free to offer their applications for MorphOS also. *We* won't hinder anyone from developing applications for MorphOS. SDKs from us always will be free.
10) With Papyrus we'll have a real office-package with word-processor."


3. Mr. Haage:

Replying to the comment by Mr. Garlich (see earlier in this thread), Mr. Haage says he wouldn't know about what Mr. Garlich would be speaking.


4. Ralph:

(He was asked if Nova Design or Paul Nolan would have announced support for MorphOS already.)

"We have also spoken with Kermit Woodal several times. Since he's also closely related with Merlancia, there are certainly possibilities. :-) Paul Nolan does have a key and a development system since last year... [...]"
"party on:-)" (R.S.) : Comment 201 of 233ANN.lu
Posted by adam ceremuga on 08-Oct-2001 09:38 GMT
In reply to Comment 200 (Samface):
@samface
>Well, you seem a little confused here. You have to remember that AmigaOS5 is >the *final* product with the AmigaOS and the AmigaDE merged as one, meaning the >AmigaDE *with* (as added features meaning that the AmigaDE itself won't give > you those features on it's own)

umm o.k, os4 does not exist much less 5, sure it's easy to get lost in marketing speak.. but i'll shut up and just quote our glorious leader Bill.

-------
September 28th 2000 Executive Update: "The next version of the Software Development Kit will be out in the next couple of weeks...
It will feature a new raft of multimedia (Mesa, the SSEYOKoan Audio Engine, streaming) as well better development tools..

October 21 2000 Executive Update: "there was a mistake in the September 28 Executive Update. As erroneously printed in the update, the Amiga SDK 1.1 does not include the sound, UI, or 3D pieces. These will be found in version 1.2, which itself will be released shortly."

22 November 2000 Executive Update:
"AmigaDE is still moving ahead quickly and we look forward to delivering another version of the Amiga Software DevelopmenKit (SDK) with new features and enhancements. In the coming weeks, wewill be adding 3D and sound to AmigaDE."

April 12th 2001 :
"AmigaDE doing great and on target with the goals that we set forth and we will continue development efforts."

11th June 2001
"In the coming weeks we are going to see the releases of not one but three new Amiga Products!:
AmigaOne PPC /1200 - On Schedule and Rockin'
AmigaOS 4.0, and shortly thereafter AmigaOS 4.2 on schedule for release Summer of '01 and will offer the next generation of Amiga desktop - on PPC!
AmigaDE 1.1 so the rest of the world may begin to learn the power of Amiga – For Cell Phones, PDA’s, and other portable devices."
----

say what u want about ralph but at least he dosn't let marketing hype get in the way of reality which unfotunatly is the case for bill & co
oh and one more
fleecy irc conference december 2000
[Fleecy]...1.5M is Million - we have set top box orders for the DE for that.
"party on:-)" (R.S.) : Comment 202 of 233ANN.lu
Posted by adam ceremuga on 08-Oct-2001 09:40 GMT
3d and sound were 'always' sopoused to be part of DE as modern PDAs such as Zauras can handle them.
"party on:-)" (R.S.) : Comment 203 of 233ANN.lu
Posted by Martin Heine on 08-Oct-2001 09:48 GMT
In reply to Comment 193 (Mekanix):
@ Jürgen:

Yes, my translations aren't perfect, and I never claimed otherwise. I
did them, as I said, in a hurry. The choice had been to do it "quick
and dirty" or not at all. Therefore I asked myself what I'd prefer
regarding important English news if I wouldn't be able to understand
them: to get them at least in bad German or to get not informed at
all... I'm very "news-hungry" regarding Amiga stuff and therefore
grateful for everyone who posts or translates news. So I decide from
time to time to contribute a little bit in return, too. And this time
especially because those whose German is even worse than my English
usually don't get that much infos as we do, just because of the fact
that many important Amiga developers simply are Germans.

@ Mekanix:

I don't see Ralph "panicing". You hardly can blame him for this
thread, because it was caused by me. I did (in a quick and dirty way)
translate his (and others) comments into English and posted them here
and to csam. And even his original german comments weren't started by
him, he just reacted to a news-item about answers given by Mr. Haage
to questions by Petra Struck.

Maybe there's indeed a little bit more behind the scenes that Ralph
doesn't emphasize that much (possibly related to McEwen's partners "we
don't know") - but I don't see how he could be blamed for discussions
he hasn't started.
"party on:-)" (R.S.) : Comment 204 of 233ANN.lu
Posted by Samface on 08-Oct-2001 09:55 GMT
In reply to Comment 201 (adam ceremuga):
Not once did I deny the delays that has occured. However, there's a quite reasonable explanation (not an excuse) to those on Eyetech's AmigaOne timeline page:

"The whole AmigaOne-1200 project is suddenly much bigger and very much better as a result. The small downside however is that during the several weeks leading up to the OS4.x announcement (at St Louis at the beginning of April) and more particularly since then, we and Amiga Inc have had to redirect much of our efforts to carefully defining, planning and allocating tasks and responsibilities to OS4.0 development and integration with the A1-1200. The extra work involved has also, inevitably, meant that timeframes have slipped."

As also already stated on this thread, not even M$ has been able to keep their timelines at times. Anyway, to complain and whine about it won't be of help. Like I said, if they do fail it won't be a benefit to anyone. Let's just hope they succeed and drop it for now.

Failure is not an option...
"party on:-)" (R.S.) : Comment 205 of 233ANN.lu
Posted by Mekanix on 08-Oct-2001 13:50 GMT
In reply to Comment 203 (Martin Heine):
> I don't see Ralph "panicing". You hardly
> can blame him for this thread, because it
> was caused by me. I did (in a quick and
> dirty way) translate his (and others)
> comments into English and posted them here
> and to csam.

I have not made any judgementcall on your translations. I've been following amiga-news.de all along.

> but I don't see how he could be blamed
> for discussions he hasn't started.

Define "started". No, Ralph Schmidt didn't make FP (First Post) on those two thread on amiga-news.de. But he sure was the one fuelling this whole slandering-quest.

Try reading what RS is writing and perhaps more importantly, what he is *not* writing. Apparently Haage have been left out in the cold by Amiga Inc, and have turned their attention at QNX/AmigaXL. The MorphOS team seems to have been in negotiation with Amiga Inc for OS4 and/or OS4.2. Apparently RS had a contract he never signed. RS' take on this is that Amiga Inc is incapable of leading an OS project, and that's what RS have been preaching since last monday.

As it looks now (or how RS wants it to look), there is no OS4. Haage have left with the x86-advocates in the community. And RS 0wn the PPC-marked. Right?

Now, for the fun part. Since last monday RS has been working hard as a little bee, making sure that everyone in the community understands that Amiga Inc. are pure amatures and MorphOS is the only solution left. More feverously than ever before. Something just don't add up. Why would he do that if he already owns the PPC-marked?

Because he don't? Something is brewing at Amiga Inc. RS know this, and fear it?

If I were to speculate, I would say the Amiga Inc. have finally realised that it's impossible to do any OS-work with the community's 2-3 biggest primadonnas.
"party on:-)" (R.S.) : Comment 206 of 233ANN.lu
Posted by Mekanix on 08-Oct-2001 13:57 GMT
In reply to Comment 199 (Samface):
> So, my second point beeing; Amiga inc's
> failure would *not* be a benefit to
> the MorphOS team.

I will so far as to say that MorphOS doesn't have a future. MorphOS is only catering for a small fraction of the current community. Today OS' goes for a dime a dosen. So you really need some novelty if you expect to *sell* an OS.

But what can MorphOS offer that say QNX/AmigaXL can't? Nothing! MorphOS will be just one of those hobby-OS'... and not even being free...

Amiga Inc on the other hand do have plan goes beyond 1985. If they are able to pull it of we're looking at something very interesting.
"party on:-)" (R.S.) : Comment 207 of 233ANN.lu
Posted by anonymous on 08-Oct-2001 14:43 GMT
In reply to Comment 206 (Mekanix):
Ralph only states the obvious, which you fail to grasp, Amiga has nothing to bring to the table contrary to their press releases, they have 5 employees left who know little of how to run a company competently, but are very good at useless press releases. I'm curious why so many people believe these guys still, they aren't *Amiga* people, and haven't done anything to warrant the userbase trust, other then kill off interest.
"party on:-)" (R.S.) : Comment 208 of 233ANN.lu
Posted by anonymous on 08-Oct-2001 14:46 GMT
In reply to Comment 206 (Mekanix):
Ralph only states the obvious, which you fail to grasp, Amiga has nothing to bring to the table contrary to their press releases, they have 5 employees left who know little of how to run a company competently, but are very good at useless press releases. I'm curious why so many people believe these guys still, they aren't *Amiga* people, and haven't done anything to warrant the userbase trust, other then kill off interest.
"party on:-)" (R.S.) : Comment 209 of 233ANN.lu
Posted by Mekanix on 08-Oct-2001 15:01 GMT
In reply to Comment 207 (anonymous):
What *you* fail to grasp is, that if indeed everything RS is saying is true, RS wouldn't need to make an arse of himself.

But he does. Why? Why is RS panicing? Why is he in such a hurry? Why is it so important for him to spread the word, that Amiga Inc. is incompetent? What is he fearing?

RS isn't telling everything!
"party on:-)" (R.S.) : Comment 210 of 233ANN.lu
Posted by Smith Rouelle on 08-Oct-2001 18:01 GMT
On the 'unprofessional' behavour of H&P saying what they did in the first post:

It seems the once mighty and respected H&P have now found disfavour amongst the Blind-Amiga Inc-Followers (we'll call them BAFs from now on). For the past 5 years or so, ever since I first noticed H&P they have rose to be the leading Amiga software developer, and with their help on OS3.5 and 3.9 probably the most important. In all that time I have always known them to be truely professional and dignified at all times - I am sure nobody can disagree with me there. But what must it have taken for them to get in such a state that they had to make this public comment? But instead of listening to this respected, and once staunch partner of Amiga Inc, the BAFs instead lay into H&P. The BAFs have not used their brains in this case.


On Mr Schmidt:

Poor Ralph has been the BAFs' hate-figure for years now, he has endured insults about his professionalism, his abilities, and his motives from the BAFs. Additionally the BAFs repeatedly suggest that MorphOS can not succeed. What is worst thing that this embattled man has done? He is (IS!) developing an Amiga-like operating system for the PPC. Oh, and he often has the audacity to defend his work publicly.

Ralph is doing work, work that will benefit the Amiga community greatly - who cares that it isn't called 'Amiga'? Apart from the BAFs that is..?

On OS4:

H&P say they aren't doing it. Amiga Inc hasn't changed from its original statement regarding OS4. Who is doing it? Who has the expertise to port Exec to another processor? How can OS4 materialise if H&P is not working on it? The BAFs are not clear, perhaps their blindess extends to the realms of fairies developing operating systems?


Now, if you're a BAF, please think about what you're writing before you publicly embarrass yourselves further.


-Smithy
"party on:-)" (R.S.) : Comment 211 of 233ANN.lu
Posted by Smithy on 08-Oct-2001 18:29 GMT
In reply to Comment 210 (Smith Rouelle):
>H&P say they aren't doing it

Sorry, this is incorrect. I am assuming they aren't doing it as Ralph said Amiga Inc have recently sent him a contract. My apologies.
"party on:-)" (R.S.) : Comment 212 of 233ANN.lu
Posted by Steff on 08-Oct-2001 21:47 GMT
In reply to Comment 1 (gz):
I don't believe what I'm hearing here. I''ve stuck in there with the amiga since I bought my Amiga 500+ in '88. If Amiga Inc. can't pull this off you can forget everything! MorphOS can't be anything but a project for a group of individuals. Splitting the market does not improve the Amiga OS as has been proven by years of non-developement. Windows hasn't had any competition and that is the ONLY reason for it's success.If OS 4.0 doesn't show up before the end of this year, it's over for me. To invest in anything that uses MorphOS as it's base, surely you're joking! If I'm going to change Operating Systems I could just as well go Windoze or Mac!
"party on:-)" (R.S.) : Comment 213 of 233ANN.lu
Posted by Anonymous on 08-Oct-2001 22:00 GMT
In reply to Comment 201 (adam ceremuga):
I know similar bigmouth companies whose stocks dropped to 1/100th when it becamemore and more clear they had no real product to deliver...
"party on:-)" (R.S.) : Comment 214 of 233ANN.lu
Posted by Anonymous on 08-Oct-2001 22:21 GMT
In reply to Comment 205 (Mekanix):
>If I were to speculate, I would say the Amiga Inc. have finally realised that>it's impossible to do any OS-work with the community's 2-3 biggest primadonnas.>Oh yes...I always wondered about the background of AInc hiring their much appreciatedMICROSOFT developers...maybe now the parts of the puzzle fit together?
"party on:-)" (R.S.) : Comment 215 of 233ANN.lu
Posted by the man in the shadows on 09-Oct-2001 01:07 GMT
In reply to Comment 210 (Smith Rouelle):
You know Smithy, before I start, I actually had to break a sweat thinking about this one and wanted say thanks for the workout. Some posts lend well to a quick response while others take time soak in. As for Ralph, I have no qualms against him or MorphOS, I just have a different path I'm taking and it's geared towards OS4. I will definitely agree on some points, but I've got to add to a few others.

> For the past 5 years or so, ever since I first noticed H&P they have
> rose to be the leading Amiga software developer, and with their help
> on OS3.5 and 3.9 probably the most important. In all that time I have
> always known them to be truely professional and dignified at all times
> - I am sure nobody can disagree with me there.

There are many times H&P have been seen as unprofessional and even embarrassed themselves publicly. Anyone remember the 3.9 release with the Genesis fiasco? It is unfortunate that in order to succeed as a professional corporation, you must walk on the heads of others. I'm sure Ralph can fill you in on the history of H&P if you don't already know. Think about it, other than completely different directions of the PPC kernels, why else would Ralph not work with H&P?

> He is (IS!) developing an Amiga-like operating system for the PPC.

Something you may or may not understand, regardless of if OS4 is released, there will still be die-hard Amiga users who will refuse to use MorphOS even if MorphOS worked on the systems they already have. It sounds foolish, but it is logical. It's like a Ford owner who refuses to drive a Mitsubishi (while some Ford cars/trucks have Mitsubishi engines and parts). They aren't blind, just loyal to the Amiga name is all. They shouldn't be ridiculed for placing as much faith in a single company.

[I was going to remove this next part, but several statements I felt should be left in]

> On OS4:
> H&P say they aren't doing it.

Define "it". H&P already have components of OS4 in final beta stages with the help of Olaf. If you mean "it" by the whole of OS4 then you're right, H&P are not developing all of OS4. If you mean "it" by the statement of a native PPC OS, you're also right. You have to look at some of the information where it states OS4 will be the further development of a native AmigaOS for PPC, not a complete PPC port at first. Eventually OS4.2 is supposed to be free of 68K code or at least enough to where there is no need for an A1200 to run. OS4.5 is where the major changes start to happen with a new exec kernel.

> Amiga Inc hasn't changed from its original statement regarding OS4.

It's amazing really. All the complaints about Amiga when they make any changes or when they don't change at all. Makes me wonder sometimes. What if Amiga were to embrace MorphOS by the terms requested by the MorphOS dev team? Would people still complain?

> Who is doing it?

It's already been said who is working on OS4, there are components of OS4 being developed by third parties who asked to remain nameless until the product was released while others have made statements of what they will be including.

> Who has the expertise to port Exec to another processor?

Rhetorical or a serious question? If that's a serious question you should really head over to google and type in '"micro kernel" ppc' with the double quotes to see what kind of results you can find (200+ at least). There are more micro kernels than there are Operating Systems from the looks of it. MorphOS uses the Quark micro kernel rather than the exec. What would be the reason why Amiga couldn't use a similar tactic? There are also some experimental non-PPC exec kernels written with documentation. As for the public one, Amiga has stated it would not be supported with OS3.9 (worked fine on the systems I tested). I know of two other commercial PPC native kernels that were planned; one of them was named PowerOS (I think by Titan), the other by PowerComputing if I remember correctly. There are people in the Amiga community skilled enough to write an exec kernel replacement so it's not a question of who has the expertise, but who would be willing to take on such a position?

> How can OS4 materialise if H&P is not working on it?

That's just it; H&P doesn't have to work on it unless they are bound by contract (according to Jurgen, there is no contract). Even if no contract is ever made between H&P and Amiga I'm sure they would still be one of the distributors of the final product.

> The BAFs are not clear, perhaps their blindess extends to the realms
> of fairies developing operating systems?

That's a bit obvious isn't it? The "BAFs" aren't clear for many reasons, some of them chose not to be clear or have not completely educated themselves with other potential alternatives (see the second paragraph in this post). From what I've seen, there are very few people who have educated themselves over MorphOS, AmigaOS4, AmigaOS/XL, and AROS. I may not have the end all knowledge of all those developments but at least I know why I have chosen AmigaOS4 over the others.
"party on:-)" (R.S.) : Comment 216 of 233ANN.lu
Posted by Len Carsner on 09-Oct-2001 01:16 GMT
I have no faith that anyone currently working on any of these projects will ever produce a viable product.Too much arguing, not enough action. I have stayed with Amiga since 1989, but now see no sense in continuing. The future of the Amiga has never been darker than it has in the hands of these people who would rather have a "pissing" contest than to actually try to move forward with a joint development program.I'm leaving the Amiga for an iMac. I'm tired of waiting for a tomorrow that will never arrive.The dream, the hope, has died. It's time to move forward.
"party on:-)" (R.S.) : Comment 217 of 233ANN.lu
Posted by Samface on 09-Oct-2001 04:42 GMT
In reply to Comment 216 (Len Carsner):
Please note that Amiga inc is *NOT* a part of this pathetic, useless, and disgracing discussion. If you do leave the Amiga market, that means Ralph Schmidt has won. Don't let his degrading comments on Amiga inc's work get to you, it's the words of a desperate man.

As I told Ralph earlier, most of us do *not* look upon MorphOS as an alternative to AmigaOS. Ralph should be supporting Amiga inc since their failure would be his own too.

If you've been waiting since '89, couldn't you just wait for one more month? I recommend you to hold on 'til WoA 2001 in november, I'm sure everything will be known by then.

BTW: That IMac won't make your life happier, it's not an Amiga. :-P
"party on:-)" (R.S.) : Comment 218 of 233ANN.lu
Posted by Sinan Gurkan on 09-Oct-2001 05:07 GMT
FFS2 and RoadShow betas are placed on Amigadev.net.
Both beta mailing-lists are run by AmigaDev.net...

Btw..look at cddb.library readmes on Aminet, you will
see the signs of a new exec...
"party on:-)" (R.S.) : Comment 219 of 233ANN.lu
Posted by the man in the shadows on 09-Oct-2001 05:12 GMT
In reply to Comment 217 (Samface):
> Please note that Amiga inc is *NOT* a part of this pathetic,
> useless, and disgracing discussion. If you do leave the Amiga
> market, that means Ralph Schmidt has won. Don't let his
> degrading comments on Amiga inc's work get to you, it's the
> words of a desperate man.

I will have to agree that this discussion is quite pathetic (including my own posts of adding fire to the flame). However, in a "battle" such as this, no one wins. It's a shame to lose people over bickering such as this. It reminds me much of the movie Braveheart (Dir by Mel Gibson) where one scot turns and shouts "alright lads, I'm not dying for these bastards, let's go home". While you turn to leave an army about to unleash hell, I wish you the best Len, hope to see you at the next show within a show at least.
"party on:-)" (R.S.) : Comment 220 of 233ANN.lu
Posted by Lennart Fridén on 09-Oct-2001 05:22 GMT
In reply to Comment 216 (Len Carsner):
Don't make yourself an injustice - at least buy a PowerMac instead of an iMac.
"party on:-)" (R.S.) : Comment 221 of 233ANN.lu
Posted by Lennart Fridén on 09-Oct-2001 05:28 GMT
In reply to Comment 217 (Samface):
"As I told Ralph earlier, most of us do *not* look upon MorphOS as an alternative to AmigaOS. Ralph should be supporting Amiga inc since their failure would be his own too.

If you've been waiting since '89, couldn't you just wait for one more month? I recommend you to hold on 'til WoA 2001 in november, I'm sure everything will be known by then."

No sammy, let him go. Maybe a few will wake up and see what this bickering leads to. Take a good look, your market is walking away. Now, what good did these battles do? It's like having a grocery store only to execute every potential customer as he/she steps in...
"party on:-)" (R.S.) : Comment 222 of 233ANN.lu
Posted by Agimax on 09-Oct-2001 07:36 GMT
In reply to Comment 221 (Lennart Fridén):
I know one thing. My first amiga was a 2500/030. That was in '91. I
now have a 4060T. I get tired of all the bickering and false
promises. All these companies don't realize, most of us JUST WANT
HARDWARE/SOFTWARE TO SURFACE. No more broken dreams, no waiting with
a pack of bandaids, superglue, and 10+ year technology from EBAY to
keep a machine that mainly runs beta software or hardware that costs
more than a recent 1ghz machine, and needs 'magical switches' to get
around technological imperfections.

IF AMIGA hardware/software isn't available ONCE AGAIN, I TOO WILL
leave the Amiga Community. I couldn't take another YEAR to wait on
hardware which might run at 2ghz when in a year or two could run a
AMD XP 4+ghz(speculation) w/GeForce4(speculation) and a 600mhz
FSB(speculation). I have spent more money on my AMIGA in the last few
years, than i have on my '94 Olds...

I Believe i am not the ONLY one with this 'attitude'.

Hell, i can't even get my CV64/3D repaired with a new S3/Virge/DX chip
which just had a few damaged pins back from PSI Repair in PA. It's
gonna be $85.00 min just to 'swap' another VIRGE/DX that I sent them
with the Amiga card. A few years ago, i had the motherboard repaired
for a whopping $285.00 Plus 25.00 shipping!

I ask you all, how much patience and money ripping should one Amiga
user put up with?

Here's my systems going up on EBAY if Hardware Doesn't 'Magically'
Appear in the next 2 months:

A4060T (Amiga Technologies) (57.00 Mhz) (paid $2695.00)
64 MEG EDO 60ns PNY MEMORY ON 060 BOARD (paid $130.00)
Yamaha 8x4x24 CD/R/RW (paid $235.00)
Quantum 2.1 Gig Scsi II HD (Came with system)
IBM 9.1 Gig 7500 rpm Scsi III HD (paid $275.00)
IOBLIX I/O Card - 4 serial/2 EPP-ECP Parallel (paid $149.00)
VLAB Y/C V1.3 - 2 composite IN 1 svideo IN ($399.00)
VLAB CLASSIC - 2 composite IN ($150.00)
CYBERVISION 64/3D - being repaired (Paid $285.00) + (repair $85.00+)
A 'Modified' AV/BOARD BY ME (1 tv out/1 svga-out) ($Priceless!)

Total Invested: $4318.00 + repair price

* MY POINT IS THE AMIGA MARKET GOUGES THE FEW OF US LEFT *

I could buy A HELL of a x86 or Mac system for that.

My other system:

A2500/030 @ 33 mhz w/68882 CoProcessor @ 33 Mhz
030 w/4 Megs 32 bit ram
A2091 with 2 Megs 16 bit ram
ROMS Updated to (3.1)
105 LPS Quantum HD




If any company reads this (i don't hold my breath anymore after the
past Amiga Situations) then produce what is promised, hell, that's ALL
we Amigan's have ever wanted.


Sorry for the outburst, just fed up with this whole mess of
incompetent and 'bitchy' companies who feel they are 'Gods' because
most of US kiss their asses because they are the last hope we have for
a dying breed.

May God Rest The Amiga's Sole

Agimax
------
"party on:-)" (R.S.) : Comment 223 of 233ANN.lu
Posted by Agimax on 09-Oct-2001 07:54 GMT
Forgot to add this:


I wouldn't mind Morph OS. Problem is-the hardware to update my 4060T
is $929.00 for a board that runs at 233+ mhz. I would rather go
target shooting at my Amiga with $100.00 Gold bullets in the middle
East then give another Dollar to equipment with the life expectancy of
of a Taliban Gunner and linning the Pockets of Companies and
pathetic manufacturers that do more 'bitchin' and 'lying' to defend
their $10 million dollar wafer boards that fall short of promises.

"I came here to do two things; Chew bubble gum and to kick some ass,
and right now.. I'm all out of bubble gum." - Clint Eastwood

Agimax
------
"party on:-)" (R.S.) : Comment 224 of 233ANN.lu
Posted by priest on 09-Oct-2001 08:36 GMT
Hmmm... after following the terrorism related happenings in the world, I think what we see here at ANN could be called as terrorism against Amiga community...

(And if someone has not yet noticed, Amiga Inc has secured their second financing round.)
"party on:-)" (R.S.) : Comment 225 of 233ANN.lu
Posted by Ralph Schmidt on 09-Oct-2001 09:37 GMT
In reply to Comment 205 (Mekanix):
I am not afraid of Hyperion's 4.0 backup plan, if you
mean that:-)
"party on:-)" (R.S.) : Comment 226 of 233ANN.lu
Posted by Ralph Schmidt on 09-Oct-2001 10:11 GMT
In reply to Comment 215 (the man in the shadows):
@Kent Seaton

>It's amazing really. All the complaints about Amiga when they make any changes or when
>they don't change at all. Makes me wonder sometimes. What if Amiga were to embrace
>MorphOS by the terms requested by the MorphOS dev team? Would people still
>complain?

Sorry..building up a myth again about "MorphOS contract terms"
to distort the fact that there is something like that ?

Hyperion is now ""planning"" to ""do"" 4.0...why hiding it ?:-)

Sure..writing an Exec is not such a problem...the problem is
the whole design to work out as planned which needs some forsight
and integrating ixemul into a PPC mixed mode exec is *extremely*
painful. And then the *testing* takes real time.

Personally i expect from newssites that they try to inform
their readers about all developments and ask annoying questions
to the players but up to now i only see you argueing here
against MorphOS with the only point that it's not named AmigaOS.
You should take an eye how Petra handles that at www.amiga-news.de.
She tries to stay neutral to all parties as far as possible to
provide their readers the best possible service...no biased news
so they can build up their opionion themselves.
For the people which don't know...Kent Seaton is from www.amiga.org.


BTW: False information on your side...the work which is done
for so called 4.0 (TCP,FFS2) is NOT by H&P.
It's *fully* controlled by its author which is Olaf Barthel.
"party on:-)" (R.S.) : Comment 227 of 233ANN.lu
Posted by the man in the shadows on 09-Oct-2001 12:11 GMT
In reply to Comment 226 (Ralph Schmidt):
> Sorry..building up a myth again about "MorphOS contract terms"
> to distort the fact that there is something like that ?

You have no eye for journalism do you? I wasn't striking a pose about a possible "myth" of Amiga working with Morph. I was stating a question that had yet to be asked, hence the "What if" beginning. Not in a sense that AmigaOS would include some sort of MorphOS kernel but what would the outcome be of the common populace? Would it be anger? Would it be joy? I haven't a clue what would happen which is why I posed the question. Don't assume so much of my own statements.

> Hyperion is now ""planning"" to ""do"" 4.0...why hiding it ?:-)

> Sure..writing an Exec is not such a problem...the problem is
> the whole design to work out as planned which needs some forsight
> and integrating ixemul into a PPC mixed mode exec is *extremely*
> painful. And then the *testing* takes real time.

From what I know, Hyperion has two possibly three developers working on an exec of some form. Since I haven't been able to gather all of the information on it, I don't want to say anything about it other than the obvious. I know one name for a fact, the other is shaky and the third doesn't exist in my book since it was just rumor. The one person I know is not listed on the Hyperion web site. The other one I haven't been able to isolate yet.

> Personally i expect from newssites that they try to inform
> their readers about all developments and ask annoying questions
> to the players but up to now i only see you argueing here
> against MorphOS with the only point that it's not named AmigaOS.

Please, quote me by all means where I personally am mocking MorphOS because it lacks the name alone. I have yet to use any such a statement where I am personally against MorphOS due to the lacking "Amiga" tagged to it. The statements made from above are only stating the obvious information about the community and not of my own accord. So honestly Ralph, can you say you have read my posts and completely understand them? If yes, then why do you accuse me of such actions when I have clearly not done such? Read them again if you don't believe me, it's in black and white.

> You should take an eye how Petra handles that at www.amiga-news.de.
> She tries to stay neutral to all parties as far as possible to
> provide their readers the best possible service...no biased news
> so they can build up their opionion themselves.

That's called journalism. It's in the dictionary. I try and stay neutral and devoid of all things and hang back "in the shadows" but there's a point when I have to speak my thoughts about what happens or will potentially happen in the community. Granted sometimes my own thoughts are quite radical, but some questions need to be raised. If not to question the minds of those who I reply to but also to ignite thoughts of those who also read my statements (in essence, journalism). On the other side of journalism is editorialist where the editor obviously takes a side and a line is drawn making it obvious of their own opinions. If I'm so condemning to MorphOS, why am I bringing up bad spots of H&P and willing to try MorphOS again when I have the hardware available?

> For the people which don't know...Kent Seaton is from www.amiga.org.

I think that's about obvious Ralph. I've stated who I am many times before. If someone doesn't know by now, they are either blind or don't pay enough attention. I released the information of who I am back in late 98 or so. Ironically, it was about the same time I started volunteering as the public relations director for Amiga.org. Glad you finally opened your eyes to that one.

> BTW: False information on your side...the work which is done
> for so called 4.0 (TCP,FFS2) is NOT by H&P.
> It's *fully* controlled by its author which is Olaf Barthel.

And this is news how? Olaf is/has written those two components, there's no question in my mind about that. H&P have included his works in past software releases so why not include these as well. To quote you from post#124

> The few "OS4" work which is tested for some months are
> Olaf Barthel's own property and owned by him.

Is there something I said different from this information? Did I say H&P developed those two components or did I say they were components of OS4 thanks to Olaf? This almost proves to me you didn't even bother reading my posts before you jumped to conclusions of my meaning.

Oh yeah, I almost forgot. You got your 200+ comments now for this thread. Is it finally time to end it?
"party on:-)" (R.S.) : Comment 228 of 233ANN.lu
Posted by To set-up the clocks about delays debate on 09-Oct-2001 15:18 GMT
Hello,

The delays debate is completely stupid as MorphOS/BPlan didn't respect their delays too.
The Pegasos (including MorphOS of course) has also been announced for this year perhaps last year, can't remember exactly.
But it's now official that Pegasos (and MorphOS) will not be out until Q1 2002.
So blamming Amiga Inc and OS 4 team for that is stupid. In fact very little companies respect their delays, particularly in the computer market and in a small market like the Amiga market.

So stop stupid debates! Let the things go! And see by yourself what will REALLY happen!
Speculations are for idiots!

Bye
"party on:-)" (R.S.) : Comment 229 of 233ANN.lu
Posted by Anonymous on 10-Oct-2001 01:07 GMT
In reply to Comment 228 (To set-up the clocks about delays debate):
>The Pegasos (including MorphOS of course) has also been announced for this year>perhaps last year, can't remember exactly.Perhaps last year??End of last year it was announced (and you can look it up on bplan-gmbh.de HP)that a new PPC System is in development. Afaik any release date was unofficial.Basically they say: "It's ready when it's ready".>But it's now official that Pegasos (and MorphOS) will not be out until Q1 2002.Yes, but maybe we still see a "Zero" developer series this year?
"party on:-)" (R.S.) : Comment 230 of 233ANN.lu
Posted by Anonymous on 12-Oct-2001 07:50 GMT
If Amiga inc go, I go. MorphOS are trying to push Amiga Inc out of the market and take over the market space. Dirty.
"party on:-)" (R.S.) : Comment 231 of 233ANN.lu
Posted by Anonymous on 13-Oct-2001 02:39 GMT
In reply to Comment 230 (Anonymous):
The problem is...AInc is not really in the market.
"party on:-)" (R.S.) : Comment 232 of 233ANN.lu
Posted by pixie on 07-Apr-2004 16:43 GMT
pixie has been here! :))
"party on:-)" (R.S.) : Comment 233 of 233ANN.lu
Posted by MIKE on 08-Apr-2004 01:42 GMT
In reply to Comment 232 (pixie):
Me too, it was interesting reading through, to see how prophetic laire was, and how off base Kent Seaton and Samface were. At least Kent has given up, Samface after all this time still believes the press releases, and talks the same nonsense.
Anonymous, there are 233 items in your selection (but only 33 shown due to limitation) [1 - 50] [51 - 100] [101 - 150] [151 - 200] [201 - 233]
Back to Top