28-Apr-2024 12:00 GMT.		 UNDER CONSTRUCTION
Anonymous, there are 56 items in your selection (but only 6 shown due to limitation) [1 - 50] [51 - 56]
[Files] Amiga Exec 1.2 disassembled and commentedANN.lu
Posted on 22-Jul-2003 23:24 GMT by Hagge56 comments
View flat
View list
followed a link from a link from a ... and found this.
Amiga Exec 1.2 disassembled and commented : Comment 51 of 56ANN.lu
Posted by Gregg on 24-Jul-2003 12:03 GMT
In reply to Comment 50 (Joe "Floid" Kanowitz):
Excellent post; glad to see someone else didn't forget the MorphOS shift to full independence from the Amiga OS.

Gregg
Amiga Exec 1.2 disassembled and commented : Comment 52 of 56ANN.lu
Posted by Matt Parsons on 24-Jul-2003 12:25 GMT
In reply to Comment 50 (Joe "Floid" Kanowitz):
And what about the Gold team?
Amiga Exec 1.2 disassembled and commented : Comment 53 of 56ANN.lu
Posted by Alkis Tsapanidis on 24-Jul-2003 13:25 GMT
In reply to Comment 39 (Anonymous):
they dont need to have the source. parts of morphOS behave in exactly
the same way that AmigaOS_3.1 does. even bugs and artifacts have been
cloned/copied exactly!! add to the fact that MorphOS is featuring
the same features of AmigaOS and therefore breaking several patents
by doing so unlicenced (and example i give you - you can move
the mouse using qualified keys and the cursor)
--

Of course the bugs and the artifacts are replicated... If they weren't SEVERAL
apps would be broken...
And about patents, I can't see anyone being able to use menu multiselection
(a patent). Qualifier mouse moving is there in several OSes, including Windows
and Linux.
Amiga Exec 1.2 disassembled and commented : Comment 54 of 56ANN.lu
Posted by John Chandler on 24-Jul-2003 14:12 GMT
In reply to Comment 3 (Ray A. Akey):
Doh! Me and my curiousity!
Amiga Exec 1.2 disassembled and commented : Comment 55 of 56ANN.lu
Posted by curious on 24-Jul-2003 15:51 GMT
In reply to Comment 7 (Anonymous):
Hi,

A little bit ironic your post no ? :)
Well if you post it somewhere everyone will have a look, but you'll be probably in trouble then.

Carl S. :)
Amiga Exec 1.2 disassembled and commented : Comment 56 of 56ANN.lu
Posted by MarkTime on 24-Jul-2003 15:57 GMT
Copyrights protect the rights to 'copy'
They have nothing to do with the right of possession.

No one is in violation of a copyright because they possess copyrighted material.
It is the people that are involved in distribution that are the only ones who violated the 'copy right....the right to copy...however you need to say it'

Now, the DMCA is a different issue, and licenses are different issues.
But this isn't a license or DMCA issue, it is a copyright issue.
If you want to, go after the person distributing the offensive material
and IF you can convince his web provider to take it down (not hard)
that will happen.

And you will have the appropriate resolution for the very minor offense that we have witnessed.

I spend a lot of time trying to convince people not to be thieves.
Politely telling them thievery is wrong, while making some of you go
*ape sh#t*...is actually the most tamest of responses.

Less tame responses, like putting people in jail, are appropriate for certain types of crimes...but I happen to believe almost never appropriate for a crime like copyright violation.

I staunchly advocate my right to call you pirates and a22bandits (and there are a lot of you here) out...because you are scum.

I would, nevertheless, not threaten to take you to court, or ever advocate prison time for such things....that's simply absurd. And I agree, the U.S. is the country that is primarily gone too far in trying to end piracy by draconian means.

Nevertheless, a lot of other individuals residing in various countries, including the U.S., but most of you are in Europe, and are absolutley disgraceful representives for your countries....here right on this board, are sick criminals, and deserve a good scolding.
Anonymous, there are 56 items in your selection (but only 6 shown due to limitation) [1 - 50] [51 - 56]
Back to Top