26-Apr-2024 00:42 GMT.		 UNDER CONSTRUCTION
[News] Fleecy comments on outsourcing AmigaOSANN.lu
Posted on 06-Nov-2001 14:06 GMT by Teemu I. Yliselä51 comments
View flat
View list
Read Fleecy's comments from the AmigaOne mailinglist below.

Yes Amiga is in control of OS4.0 - we have merely outsourced the project management. I am in daily contact with Hyperion and a feature document and deadlines and timescales are mulled over in minute detail.

As I explained at the show, this deal is more about freeing Amiga up to work on the SGA (Second Generation Amiga). AmigaOS4.0 was always more to do with getting a PPC based OS working on very specific PPC HW, and we were wasting a lot of time bouncing backwards and forwards. With the outsourcing agreement, the implementation has been moved much closer to the first piece of HW itself.

List of all comments to this article
Sorted by date, most recent at bottom
Comment 1Dave06-Nov-2001 13:11 GMT
Comment 2Brecht [darklite]06-Nov-2001 13:23 GMT
Comment 3Anonymous06-Nov-2001 14:04 GMT
Comment 4Dave06-Nov-2001 14:08 GMT
Comment 5AlBolone06-Nov-2001 14:37 GMT
Comment 6gz06-Nov-2001 14:39 GMT
Comment 7Bertrand PRESLES06-Nov-2001 14:42 GMT
Comment 8Dave06-Nov-2001 15:03 GMT
Comment 9priest06-Nov-2001 15:13 GMT
Comment 10Martin Norman06-Nov-2001 15:31 GMT
Comment 11AlBolone06-Nov-2001 15:32 GMT
Comment 12Graham06-Nov-2001 16:30 GMT
Fleecy comments on outsourcing AmigaOS : Comment 13 of 51ANN.lu
Posted by AlBolone on 06-Nov-2001 17:07 GMT
@ Graham:
No discussion about the importance of AmigaDE! But now tell me what they have archieved with the DE by now (in words: two years!!)?? There's a DE player and an SDK - both barely more than TAO code! Still missing some updates that were scheduled for the end of last year (3D and stuff). Now anybody tell me what they really got done to make me believe in their abalities! I can't see a thing that justifies the common "But Amiga said they would..." attitude of the fellow brand followers, b/c Amiga just said they would...
Talking about Amiga is like talking about the vacuum, that got mentioned before... and I wouldn't be half sick of it if they wouldn't have done so much talk about it!!
P.S. Fleecy: Where's your pathfinder systems, Amy and whatever illusionary definitions you guys have been talking about the last two years... ?? You should read sometimes what you're talking about!
Jump...
TopPrevious commentNext commentbottom
List of all comments to this article (continued)
Comment 14Anonymous06-Nov-2001 17:18 GMT
Comment 15John Block06-Nov-2001 18:14 GMT
Comment 16Anonymous06-Nov-2001 18:49 GMT
Comment 17Paul Laycock06-Nov-2001 19:09 GMT
Comment 18AlBolone06-Nov-2001 19:57 GMT
Comment 19Smithy06-Nov-2001 21:39 GMT
Comment 20smithy06-Nov-2001 21:53 GMT
Comment 21smithy06-Nov-2001 21:59 GMT
Comment 22Keith_Blakemore-Noble06-Nov-2001 22:06 GMT
Comment 23Paul Laycock06-Nov-2001 22:45 GMT
Comment 24Paul Laycock06-Nov-2001 22:50 GMT
Comment 25Brecht [darklite]07-Nov-2001 00:05 GMT
Comment 26gz07-Nov-2001 01:05 GMT
Comment 27Red Moose07-Nov-2001 01:37 GMT
Comment 28Soap Opera watcher07-Nov-2001 04:08 GMT
Comment 29cybereye07-Nov-2001 06:20 GMT
Comment 30Dave07-Nov-2001 07:18 GMT
Comment 31Dave07-Nov-2001 07:21 GMT
Comment 32AlBolone07-Nov-2001 07:53 GMT
Comment 33Anonymous07-Nov-2001 08:53 GMT
Comment 34smithy07-Nov-2001 10:04 GMT
Comment 35Andy Hall07-Nov-2001 10:06 GMT
Comment 36AlBolone07-Nov-2001 10:34 GMT
Comment 37Kochwurst07-Nov-2001 11:22 GMT
Comment 38Andy hall07-Nov-2001 12:18 GMT
Comment 39gz07-Nov-2001 12:46 GMT
Comment 40AlBolone07-Nov-2001 12:49 GMT
Comment 41gz07-Nov-2001 13:09 GMT
Comment 42Andy Hall07-Nov-2001 13:17 GMT
Comment 43gz07-Nov-2001 13:26 GMT
Comment 44Dave07-Nov-2001 13:51 GMT
Comment 45AlBolone07-Nov-2001 14:05 GMT
Comment 46Brecht [darklite]07-Nov-2001 15:59 GMT
Comment 47Andy Hall07-Nov-2001 16:09 GMT
Comment 48Allen Kong07-Nov-2001 20:50 GMT
Comment 49Brecht [darklite]07-Nov-2001 20:54 GMT
Comment 50Dave08-Nov-2001 08:06 GMT
Comment 51Dave08-Nov-2001 08:38 GMT
Back to Top