[News] Fleecy Moss clarifies on ANN | ANN.lu |
Posted on 20-May-2002 22:17 GMT by SlimJim | 186 comments View flat View list |
For those of you lacking the stamina to wade through the 300+ posts-thread
on ANN (named "the next ppc amiga" ), Fleecy Moss, CTO at Amiga Inc,
made a short surprise visit to dispell some rumours about the BPlan-AInc situation (apparently
after getting the thumbs up from AInc:s legal advisors).
Snippets from various posts:
[...] "For AmigaOS4, Amiga said that it will welcome ANY and ALL hardware companies
which develop hardware. We have spent many hours of email with
representatives of bPlan and in all of them, our line has been consistent.
1.We will be very happy to provide bPlan with an OS4 licence, and to have
OS4 running on the Pegasos
2.Amiga compatability within MorphOS comes from illegally obtained source
tapes and we will use all legal process to prevent it from entering the
market.
It is not Amiga Inc preventing AmigaOS4 from running on the Pegasos. As far
as Amiga Inc is concerned, we consider the two issues mentioned above as
being completely separate."
[...]
"Most of you (with an interest in the truth anyway) have already asked the
obvious question. What would Amiga Inc gain from NOT allowing OS4 to run on
the Pegasos. Answer - absolutely nothing.
The licence terms for OS4 are the same for bPlan as for Eyetech and anyone
else who wishes to sell an Amiga product that runs OS4. It is a typical OEM
licence, and presents a level playing field, for producers, for distributors
and for customers. You will find NO exclusive deals done for any product
that carries the Amiga seal of approval, and no favouritism played to any
company or individual.
Any company that says that they approached us and we rejected them is lying.
They may not have liked certain elements of the OEM deal, but it is the same
deal as everyone else is offered."
[...]
"Anything to do with MorphOS and its 'amiga compatability' will be decided,
so it seems, in the courts."
|
|
List of all comments to this article |
Fleecy Moss clarifies on ANN : Comment 180 of 186 | ANN.lu |
Posted by Akaru on 22-May-2002 07:16 GMT | When i say You guys don't know <insert explitive> about BeOS and its demise I mean it, your all blaming one factor when in truth it was a large number of factors, don't even try to use it as a backup to your pathetic arguments because it won't work.
BeOS got kicked out of the PPC market so it had no choice but to go x86, this was apples fault because they killed the ppc clone market, which would have lead to apples demise, and no doubt to BeOS's triumph.
x86 posed several problems, first making BeOS work on hardware, which meant writing drivers. And second getting their product out there.
Be didn't manage to get any systems shipped with BeOS live because of Microsoft's OEM thing, so the end users would have to set it up to boot into BeOS if they wanted to use it.
Be never really had a choice in the decisions it made because it was a small player in big markets, and other people's decisions forced their hands.
The only way that Be killed BeOS is that they never opened sourced it to the community.
Please I beg of you, don't keep trying to win your stupid arguments with incorrect facts about bankrupt OS companys. |
|
List of all comments to this article (continued) |
|
- User Menu
-
- About ANN archives
- The ANN archives is powered by #AmigaZeux. It was updated daily (news last: 22-Oct-2004; comments last: 18-May-2005).
ANN.lu was created, previously owned and maintained by Christian Kemp, www.ckemp.com.
- Contribute
- Not possible at this time!
- Search ANN archives
- Advanced search
- Hosting
- ANN.lu was hosted by Dreamhost. Sign up through this link, mention "ckemp" as referrer and he will get a 10% commission on any account you purchase.
Please show your appreciation for any past, present and future work on ANN.lu by making a contribution via PayPal.
|