26-Apr-2024 15:50 GMT.
UNDER CONSTRUCTION
[News] Transcript of Alan Redhouses speech at AmiGBG 2003ANN.lu
Posted on 31-Mar-2003 19:40 GMT by Peter Gordon54 comments
View flat
View list
I have transcribed Alans AmiGBG speech. It can be viewed here.
List of all comments to this article
Sorted by date, most recent at bottom
Comment 1Ole-Egil31-Mar-2003 18:04 GMT
Comment 2Ole-Egil31-Mar-2003 18:07 GMT
Comment 3Ole-Egil31-Mar-2003 18:10 GMT
Comment 4Ole-Egil31-Mar-2003 18:12 GMT
Comment 5Peter Gordon31-Mar-2003 18:25 GMT
Comment 6SlimJim31-Mar-2003 18:40 GMT
Comment 7SlimJim31-Mar-2003 18:45 GMT
Comment 8SlimJim31-Mar-2003 18:54 GMT
Comment 9Ole-Egil31-Mar-2003 19:02 GMT
Comment 10Peter Gordon31-Mar-2003 19:13 GMT
Comment 11James Carroll31-Mar-2003 22:48 GMT
Comment 12Atheist231-Mar-2003 23:50 GMT
Comment 13Anonymous01-Apr-2003 01:39 GMT
Comment 14reflect01-Apr-2003 06:00 GMT
Comment 15Ole-Egil01-Apr-2003 06:44 GMT
Comment 16Ole-Egil01-Apr-2003 06:46 GMT
Comment 17Jim Forbes-Ritte (AGAfaster)01-Apr-2003 07:16 GMT
Comment 18alan buxey01-Apr-2003 08:33 GMT
Comment 19steffo / cryonics01-Apr-2003 09:31 GMT
Comment 20Anonymous01-Apr-2003 09:40 GMT
Comment 21Ole-Egil01-Apr-2003 09:45 GMT
Comment 22Anonymous01-Apr-2003 11:05 GMT
Comment 23Don Cox01-Apr-2003 11:20 GMT
Comment 24Jim Forbes-Ritte (AGAfaster)01-Apr-2003 11:53 GMT
Comment 25Ole-Egil01-Apr-2003 12:48 GMT
Comment 26Ole-Egil01-Apr-2003 12:49 GMT
Comment 27SlimJim01-Apr-2003 16:12 GMT
Comment 28Anonymous01-Apr-2003 19:09 GMT
Comment 29Anonymous01-Apr-2003 19:20 GMT
Comment 30Anonymous01-Apr-2003 19:28 GMT
Comment 31David Scheibler01-Apr-2003 22:03 GMT
Comment 32StormLord01-Apr-2003 22:05 GMT
Comment 33Anonymous02-Apr-2003 03:50 GMT
Comment 34Ole-Egil02-Apr-2003 06:18 GMT
Comment 35samface02-Apr-2003 07:35 GMT
Comment 36IanG02-Apr-2003 10:10 GMT
Comment 37David Scheibler02-Apr-2003 10:17 GMT
Comment 38Anonymous02-Apr-2003 10:41 GMT
Comment 39Anonymous02-Apr-2003 11:21 GMT
Transcript of Alan Redhouses speech at AmiGBG 2003 : Comment 40 of 54ANN.lu
Posted by IanG on 02-Apr-2003 14:30 GMT
In reply to Comment 39 (Anonymous):
> Are you SERIOUSLY trying to claim that in a well-designed system, an external
> L3 cache will only give 3% performance improvements?
> Because if so, then you are talking out of your backside,

Whoa! I'm not claiming anything. I'm simply pointing out that you are *assuming* that the AOne is the crap item in the loop here. You have no more evidence of that than I do of my *hypothesis* that the Mac systems may be. You may not like Amigas, Eyetech or AOne's, but that does not automatically mean they are crap just because you say so.

> as anyone with even a vague clue about system designs will realise (unless,
> of course, your L1 and L2 cache are so large - say 8MB - that L3 would not be
> needed - this is blatantly not the case here).

You say "anyone with a vague clue". No offence, but your hand-waving suggests you only have at best a layman's understanding of the issues involved. Motorola and IBM *who designed the chip we're talking about* probably do have a fairly good clue about cache system designs. And they say you should see 3%.

The only real solution is to see if the Mac outperforms the AOne by as much as the L3 cache tests suggest. We can't do that because too many other variables come into play when the systems differ by so much.
Jump...
#42 Anonymous
TopPrevious commentNext commentbottom
List of all comments to this article (continued)
Comment 41IanG02-Apr-2003 14:41 GMT
Comment 42Anonymous02-Apr-2003 16:03 GMT
Comment 43Peter Gordon02-Apr-2003 16:23 GMT
Comment 44Anonymous02-Apr-2003 16:33 GMT
Comment 45Peter Gordon02-Apr-2003 19:11 GMT
Comment 46Bill "tekmage" Borsari02-Apr-2003 19:26 GMT
Comment 47Zorro03-Apr-2003 09:31 GMT
Comment 48IanG03-Apr-2003 10:10 GMT
Comment 49Ole-Egil03-Apr-2003 10:41 GMT
Comment 50Anonymous03-Apr-2003 12:47 GMT
Comment 51IanG03-Apr-2003 14:14 GMT
Comment 52Sigbjørn Skjæret03-Apr-2003 17:38 GMT
Comment 53Darth_X03-Apr-2003 18:48 GMT
Comment 54Jim Forbes-Ritte (AGAfaster)04-Apr-2003 05:20 GMT
Back to Top