19-Nov-2019 13:49 GMT.
[News] Amiga Inc. Has Sold AmigaOS RightsANN.lu
Posted on 16-Mar-2004 01:11 GMT by Anonymouse124 comments
View flat
View list
Read the story in its entirety here.
List of all comments to this article
Sorted by date, most recent at bottom
Comment 1bluvi16-Mar-2004 00:15 GMT
Comment 2Anonymous16-Mar-2004 00:19 GMT
Comment 3Anonymous16-Mar-2004 00:24 GMT
Comment 4HD16-Mar-2004 00:25 GMT
Comment 5Doobrey16-Mar-2004 00:25 GMT
Comment 6gary_c16-Mar-2004 00:28 GMT
Comment 7Anonymous16-Mar-2004 00:30 GMT
Comment 8Doobrey16-Mar-2004 00:40 GMT
Comment 9Anonymous16-Mar-2004 00:40 GMT
Comment 10dodot16-Mar-2004 00:50 GMT
Comment 11Atheist216-Mar-2004 00:52 GMT
Comment 12hnl_dkRegistered user16-Mar-2004 00:53 GMT
Comment 13Bill Hoggett16-Mar-2004 01:01 GMT
Comment 14Anonymous16-Mar-2004 01:03 GMT
Comment 15gary_c16-Mar-2004 01:05 GMT
Comment 16Johan Rönnblom16-Mar-2004 01:06 GMT
Comment 17Anonymous16-Mar-2004 01:07 GMT
Comment 18Nate DownesRegistered user16-Mar-2004 01:27 GMT
Comment 19Darrin16-Mar-2004 01:28 GMT
Comment 20Darrin16-Mar-2004 01:29 GMT
Comment 21Darrin16-Mar-2004 01:30 GMT
Comment 22Doobrey16-Mar-2004 01:35 GMT
Comment 23Darrin16-Mar-2004 01:40 GMT
Comment 24Anonymous16-Mar-2004 01:41 GMT
Comment 25gary_c16-Mar-2004 01:43 GMT
Comment 26Graham_nli16-Mar-2004 01:53 GMT
Comment 27Bill Hoggett16-Mar-2004 01:58 GMT
Comment 28Graham_nli16-Mar-2004 02:00 GMT
Comment 29gary_c16-Mar-2004 02:16 GMT
Comment 30Darrin16-Mar-2004 02:32 GMT
Comment 31Darrin16-Mar-2004 02:35 GMT
Comment 32Anonymous16-Mar-2004 02:51 GMT
Comment 33Anonymous16-Mar-2004 02:53 GMT
Comment 34Pimploch16-Mar-2004 02:58 GMT
Comment 35Anonymous16-Mar-2004 03:01 GMT
Comment 36Graham_nli16-Mar-2004 03:02 GMT
Comment 37Nate DownesRegistered user16-Mar-2004 03:09 GMT
Comment 38Darrin16-Mar-2004 03:19 GMT
Comment 39Kronos16-Mar-2004 03:19 GMT
Comment 40hooligan/dcsRegistered user16-Mar-2004 03:30 GMT
Comment 41Anonymous16-Mar-2004 03:37 GMT
Comment 42Graham_nli16-Mar-2004 03:43 GMT
Comment 43gary_c16-Mar-2004 03:47 GMT
Comment 44Anonymous16-Mar-2004 04:09 GMT
Comment 45gary_c16-Mar-2004 04:29 GMT
Comment 46the man in the shadows16-Mar-2004 04:30 GMT
Comment 47EyeAm16-Mar-2004 04:52 GMT
Comment 48Graham_nli16-Mar-2004 04:55 GMT
Comment 49the man in the shadows16-Mar-2004 05:02 GMT
Comment 50Graham_nli16-Mar-2004 05:03 GMT
Comment 51the man in the shadows16-Mar-2004 05:08 GMT
Comment 52EyeAm16-Mar-2004 05:09 GMT
Comment 53T_Bone16-Mar-2004 05:14 GMT
Comment 54T_Bone16-Mar-2004 05:15 GMT
Comment 55gary_c16-Mar-2004 05:23 GMT
Comment 56Graham_nli16-Mar-2004 05:37 GMT
Comment 57Anonymous16-Mar-2004 05:49 GMT
Comment 58Graham_nli16-Mar-2004 05:53 GMT
Comment 59Anonymous16-Mar-2004 06:01 GMT
Comment 60Mikey_C16-Mar-2004 06:09 GMT
Comment 61Graham_nli16-Mar-2004 06:11 GMT
Comment 62Anonymous16-Mar-2004 06:16 GMT
Comment 63Graham_nli16-Mar-2004 06:17 GMT
Comment 64Mikey_C16-Mar-2004 06:18 GMT
Comment 65the man in the shadows16-Mar-2004 06:18 GMT
Comment 66Kjetil16-Mar-2004 06:42 GMT
Comment 67Jupp316-Mar-2004 06:48 GMT
Comment 68gary_c16-Mar-2004 06:55 GMT
Comment 69gary_c16-Mar-2004 07:00 GMT
Comment 70Darrin16-Mar-2004 07:03 GMT
Comment 71Eva16-Mar-2004 07:06 GMT
Comment 72Mikey_C16-Mar-2004 07:08 GMT
Comment 73EyeAm16-Mar-2004 07:12 GMT
Comment 74Graham_nli16-Mar-2004 07:14 GMT
Comment 75Darrin16-Mar-2004 07:21 GMT
Comment 76Graham_nli16-Mar-2004 07:31 GMT
Comment 77Anonymous16-Mar-2004 07:32 GMT
Comment 78Darrin16-Mar-2004 07:34 GMT
Comment 79takemehomegrandmaRegistered user16-Mar-2004 09:00 GMT
Comment 80takemehomegrandmaRegistered user16-Mar-2004 09:09 GMT
Comment 81Amon_ReRegistered user16-Mar-2004 09:15 GMT
Comment 82Amon_ReRegistered user16-Mar-2004 09:17 GMT
Comment 83priest16-Mar-2004 09:22 GMT
Comment 84priest16-Mar-2004 09:24 GMT
Comment 85takemehomegrandmaRegistered user16-Mar-2004 09:35 GMT
Comment 86Amon_ReRegistered user16-Mar-2004 09:51 GMT
Comment 87takemehomegrandmaRegistered user16-Mar-2004 10:04 GMT
Comment 88takemehomegrandmaRegistered user16-Mar-2004 10:14 GMT
Comment 89Don CoxRegistered user16-Mar-2004 10:16 GMT
Comment 90Don CoxRegistered user16-Mar-2004 10:20 GMT
Comment 91takemehomegrandmaRegistered user16-Mar-2004 10:41 GMT
Comment 92Amon_ReRegistered user16-Mar-2004 10:49 GMT
Comment 93takemehomegrandmaRegistered user16-Mar-2004 10:58 GMT
Comment 94Graham_nli16-Mar-2004 11:12 GMT
Comment 95Amon_ReRegistered user16-Mar-2004 11:15 GMT
Comment 96muhahahaha16-Mar-2004 11:36 GMT
Comment 97Don CoxRegistered user16-Mar-2004 12:36 GMT
Comment 98Don CoxRegistered user16-Mar-2004 12:39 GMT
Comment 99Don CoxRegistered user16-Mar-2004 12:41 GMT
Comment 100Don CoxRegistered user16-Mar-2004 12:46 GMT
Comment 101takemehomegrandmaRegistered user16-Mar-2004 13:10 GMT
Comment 102takemehomegrandmaRegistered user16-Mar-2004 13:11 GMT
Comment 103Ketzer16-Mar-2004 13:15 GMT
Comment 104takemehomegrandmaRegistered user16-Mar-2004 13:41 GMT
Comment 105Anonymous16-Mar-2004 14:27 GMT
Comment 106Ketzer16-Mar-2004 14:40 GMT
Comment 107Ketzer16-Mar-2004 14:57 GMT
Comment 108takemehomegrandmaRegistered user16-Mar-2004 15:11 GMT
Comment 109Anonymous16-Mar-2004 15:22 GMT
Comment 110takemehomegrandmaRegistered user16-Mar-2004 15:37 GMT
Comment 111takemehomegrandmaRegistered user16-Mar-2004 15:39 GMT
Comment 112Anonymous16-Mar-2004 15:42 GMT
Comment 113Anonymous16-Mar-2004 15:44 GMT
Comment 114Tigger16-Mar-2004 18:38 GMT
Comment 115Doobrey17-Mar-2004 00:47 GMT
Comment 116Doobrey17-Mar-2004 01:06 GMT
Comment 117Ketzer17-Mar-2004 06:06 GMT
Comment 118Graham_nli17-Mar-2004 06:14 GMT
Comment 119The Lesbian Avengers17-Mar-2004 09:30 GMT
Comment 120Tigger18-Mar-2004 07:19 GMT
Amiga Inc. Has Sold AmigaOS Rights : Comment 121 of 124ANN.lu
Posted by Tigger on 18-Mar-2004 07:28 GMT
In reply to Comment 118 (Graham_nli):
I doubt anyone said that it was a photoshop forgery, if they did then more fool them.
Pay closer attention, people this week were explaining how it was a photoshop forgery, which is really funny to all of thus who saw it, and Wayne who scanned it.

The business card exists, sure. The person who handed them out does (whether they were Garry Hare or not is another question). Whether the information on the card is correct is another matter - it could have been a misprint, a mistake that happened too late to be corrected in time for the show.
It was Garry Hare handing them out guys, its not like Garry is not known from his CDI days, and the person who told me about it, like myself met Garry long before last year. If Garry was handing them out and they were misprints, dont you think he wouldnt have told people he was CEO during the conversation?? Also why did McEwen identify Garry as the CEO during his deposition in April if your theory is correct??
#123 Ketzer
TopPrevious commentNext commentbottom
List of all comments to this article (continued)
Comment 122Ketzer19-Mar-2004 14:30 GMT
Comment 123Ketzer19-Mar-2004 14:32 GMT
Comment 124Gregg19-Mar-2004 15:26 GMT
Back to Top