26-Apr-2024 13:47 GMT.		 UNDER CONSTRUCTION
Anonymous, there are 236 items in your selection (but only 86 shown due to limitation) [1 - 50] [51 - 100] [101 - 150] [151 - 200] [201 - 236]
[News] Interview with FleecyANN.lu
Posted on 03-May-2002 22:18 GMT by Vidar Langberget236 comments
View flat
View list
I've just published an interview with Fleecy Moss.
You can find the normal version here.
And for those using Amiga browsers, use this link.
Interview with Fleecy : Comment 151 of 236ANN.lu
Posted by Frodon on 05-May-2002 20:10 GMT
Hello,
Contrary to some seem to think about me, I'm also waiting for AmigaOS 4 as lot of others here. But I feel very frustrated by the unrealistic announced release date and I don't think i'm not and will not be the only one. I fed up to hear people saying "very soon" or things like that even if this people know perfectly that it's unrealistic.
It has always be like this in the Amiga world (Escom, Gateway, Phase 5...etc) and that's why I starting to be fed up to always live the same cycle: wait until announced date --> deception because delayed --> wait until new announced date --> deception because delayed again...etc I was quite agree when Amiga Inc said that they'll announce only until they know it's ready, but it's sad they don't respected that. The problem is not only that this is not an exact science in the AmigaOS 4 case, it's that the estimation dates are not realistic and what frustrate me is that I know that Hermans had the elements to give a really more realistic date but have preferred to announce a most short period in order to make people feeling that they will not wait long.
So that's why i blamed Hermans on this. This does not help people as anyway they will have to wait. That's why I advised him to rather announce dates that are rather pessimistic because it's less frustrating or saying things like "All I can tell you is that it'll be out this year" which in my humble opinion is far less frustrating than too optimistic dates that makes us enter in the circle I described.
Regards
Interview with Fleecy : Comment 152 of 236ANN.lu
Posted by SlimJim on 05-May-2002 20:48 GMT
In reply to Comment 151 (Frodon):
@Frodon
Ok, we get your point. You are trying to be the good, objective one, just happening
to have a nack for MOS. No 'good' or 'evil' involved on either side, that's also
a clear point by now. But when you comment on that you dislike people personally
(disregarding the reasons or whom it might be) on a public forum, you are
bound to take some heat. It's that simple.
On the other hand it *is* good to se a MOS fan that is actually /trying/ not to
be offensive and plain rude all the time. You sound like a reasonable guy most of
the time (and to be fair, the vast majority of posters in those forums are not
involved in any shouting or screaming. But it's the 'grunters' that is most easily
spotted (no Amitroll-pun intended :-)).
And before you respond with the predictable reposte - no, not only one
side is to be blamed for idiotic personal insults and often nearly illiterate
attitudes. When reading those forums, I read many a 'pro-AOS'-post thinking "Oh my,
why did THAT guy have to show up again?"
It so happens though that I seem to think that way a lot more often when reading posts from
the broken-record 'pro-MOS,anti-Ben,anti-all' crew. But that last thing is of course only a
personal observation.
.
SlimJim
Interview with Fleecy : Comment 153 of 236ANN.lu
Posted by Frodon on 05-May-2002 20:58 GMT
In reply to Comment 152 (SlimJim):
Hello,
@SlimJim
Ok thanks for your post and your understanding ;-)
Regards
Interview with Fleecy : Comment 154 of 236ANN.lu
Posted by AmiTroll on 05-May-2002 21:52 GMT
Ok, since people are moaning and calling me a liar....
Yes i said it's screenshots on a PPC OS4. I assumed the guy had took the shots from a PPC accelerated system. But since he's doing the work on the gui and this is a sample of current work i think its still safe to say thats how a PPC OS4 Amiga will look. Or one look it can have. The guy is doing the gui, it's the gui that will be on OS4, so yes, it's screenshots of a PPC OS4 Amiga. Now, do you want to fight over words or do you want to admit they are OS4 screenshots? This is the kind of BS i'm talking about when i say some people only come here to play with semantics and start up bullshit. Give it a rest already?
I still want to say i didnt much like his color choices. Everyone has thier prefrences though. Some people will probably think my workbench looks are ugly too. But for defaults go back to the Powder blue look. It's like a standard since OS2.x. :)
GRUNT
Interview with Fleecy : Comment 155 of 236ANN.lu
Posted by cheesegrate on 05-May-2002 22:09 GMT
In reply to Comment 152 (SlimJim):
thanks slimjim
that was an intiligent post.
best regards
adam
Interview with Fleecy : Comment 156 of 236ANN.lu
Posted by AmiTroll on 05-May-2002 22:13 GMT
In reply to Comment 85 (Frodon):
>Hello AmiTroll,
Hi
>When I said that I don't know what AmigaOS 4 will be or that I find MorphOS cool, it's not just a matter of look and feel. It also include the OS design.
>What I don't know with AmigaOS 4 is a well is the OS design as it'll be redesigned from scratch (new kernel...etc), do you understand?
Well, not exactly true. Its the same kernal only ported over to PPC binary and with a few enhancements. Like when you went from 1.x roms to 2.x roms, and then to 3.x roms. ExecSG is like rom 4.0. It's the 3.1 rom source with extentions. Same as 3.1 was an extention of the 2.04 rom. Who told you otherwise?
>I like MorphOS not just because it is like AmigaOS, it effectivily enter in consideration a lot, but that's not the only thing that enter in consideration. What I like in MorphOS is that it feature a really cool well featured new kernel (Quark) and already adopt the API compatible layer design for AmigaOS 3.x compatibility (What is planned only in AmigaOS 5 according to Amiga Inc technical documentation). I find that it's a really clean design. I don't know how really is the design of AmigaOS 4.0, I just know that it doesn't feature an API compatible layer for the OS 3.x compatibility and prefer to re-use exec and other APIs directly. But I don't know how clean or not they will be implemented.
I dont think you will have many problems making a PPC compile of your previous sources. :) There will be extentions im sure. But i don't think it will be very different at all. Why redesign every class, structure, and function call? No API compatability to 3.x in os4? Come on. I think your stretching it a bit. I expect changes considering its a new hardware environment. But totally alien like you say it is, i cant believe that.
>That's why I can't say for now if I'll like the AmigaOS design. For now I just can say that I like the MorphOS design very much but I'm open to AmigaOS 4 if it prove to have also a good design.
Yes it's important to me too. But i think an upgrade to os 3.9 will hold alot of similaritys in OS look and feel and in API. But i could be wrong. :)
>I can understand that you don't care about this design stuffs yourself, but respect that I care them personally and some others also.
But i do care. :) And if you know that the API will be totally foregin, i'd like to hear how different it will be. Besides, i think only the guys at Hyperion could answer this one. Other than a comment that the librarys will be handled a bit differently i dont know of any changes to the API.
GRUNT
Interview with Fleecy : Comment 157 of 236ANN.lu
Posted by AmiTroll on 05-May-2002 22:24 GMT
In reply to Comment 152 (SlimJim):
>(no Amitroll-pun intended :-))
Hey, don't make me pick my nose and flick it at you! :)
GRUNT
Interview with Fleecy : Comment 158 of 236ANN.lu
Posted by Donovan Reeve on 05-May-2002 22:35 GMT
In reply to Comment 87 (Alkemyst):
Well... Actually, quite a few of us read it at least sometimes, even though
the loud-mouthed boors ruin most of the threads. But your right, many don't
bother anymore and we seldom comment, not because we don't have an opinion
but because we don't want to talk with the immature jerks that have nothing
else to do but rain on everyone elses parade. It's to bad, because there are
some people here I would very much like to have a decent discussion with.
I personally wish someone would start an Amiga ONLY news site with Amiga
ONLY discussions where all else was simply deleted. If I want news about
other things there are plenty of other places to go for it.
I use many platforms and operating systems, but Amiga is still my first love.
For now, I mainly just lurk and grin or grimmace, like many of my friends.
Donovan Reeve (bubby@inebraska.com)
Interview with Fleecy : Comment 160 of 236ANN.lu
Posted by Glames on 06-May-2002 06:24 GMT
Hi,
In a previous post of this thread, I gave an exemple of how to post a rumour and my poor victim was Bill Buck ;) As I received an e-amil from him asking me to explain. I say it again: it was just an example of certain people, pro-MorphOS i have to say :(, have done for several months on that list. So, to retore the truth on Bill Buck, this is my answer :
======================================================
Bill Buck wrote:
> Hi Glames,
Hi Bill,
> Where have I ever said I was the owner of Amiga?
I don't know ;) If you read carrefully my post, you will see that was an example of certain people would have said if they were "pro-AmigaOS": an VERY ironical, not always true, post. The aim of this post was to show that everyone can spread quickly rumours... And it really works :(
> Please explain this post.
As I explain above, don't see it like a personnal attack. It was just an example of rubish posts that we can read all day long on ann.lu :(
> Thanks,
> Bill
>
>
>
Tchao, tchao
Glames
=============================================
So, take care of what you read on forum...
Tchao, tchao
Glames
Interview with Fleecy : Comment 161 of 236ANN.lu
Posted by Ole-Egil Hvitmyren on 06-May-2002 07:00 GMT
In reply to Comment 117 (Alkemyst):
The question was: "What's wrong with linux? :)". If you still can't see how that doesn't imply anything at all except that Ben seemed a bit harsh on a board that only runs linux, your brain is just too small ;)
Interview with Fleecy : Comment 162 of 236ANN.lu
Posted by Ole-Egil Hvitmyren on 06-May-2002 07:03 GMT
In reply to Comment 126 (darklite):
That was actually funny. He is very excited, isn't he? :)
Interview with Fleecy : Comment 163 of 236ANN.lu
Posted by Alkemyst on 06-May-2002 07:13 GMT
In reply to Comment 161 (Ole-Egil Hvitmyren):
i would not start with the insults.
Interview with Fleecy : Comment 164 of 236ANN.lu
Posted by Ben Hermans/Hyperion on 06-May-2002 08:44 GMT
In reply to Comment 161 (Ole-Egil Hvitmyren):
Nothing wrong with Linux but selling something called "AmigaOne" to end-users with only Linux isn't something Eyetech wants to do and I think we can only commend them for that.
To the people asking me to stay out of public forums because this would be somehow unprofessional: I understand your reasoning but it's a case of "damned if you do, damned if you don't".
If I don't go out there and correct some of the misrepresentations or outright lies they might well take on a life of their own and dissuade people from buying OS 4 or staying with the platform.
If I post here, inevitably my irritation will seep through on occassion seeing as I'm not Ghandi.
I promise to come up with a new update on OS 4 in the next ten days or so including a definitive feature-set, progress update and some screenshots from the Roadshow GUI and the HDToolbox replacement (if anybody cares to see those).
Final remark: OS 4 is nearly entirely source-code compatible with OS 3.x. Thomas Frieden estimates the compatibility at 95%.
Interview with Fleecy : Comment 165 of 236ANN.lu
Posted by Nicolas Sallin on 06-May-2002 08:55 GMT
In reply to Comment 164 (Ben Hermans/Hyperion):
Now you understand why some people must post to correct all the lies
and wrong informations you are doing since some years.
Interview with Fleecy : Comment 166 of 236ANN.lu
Posted by Ben Hermans/Hyperion on 06-May-2002 09:09 GMT
In reply to Comment 165 (Nicolas Sallin):
Yes ofcourse because you know because you were involved in the MorphOS - Amiga discussions, you were there when I talked to Petro in Cologne in 1999, you were there when I visited the Thendic offices late 2001, you were there when I talked to Gerald Carda in Neuss in 2000 or in Cologne, in November 2001.
And you are subscribed to the OS 4 mailing list and have access to all my e-mails.
On second thought: no you don't.
As a matter of fact, you never played a role of any significance at all.
And if your efforts limit themselves to cloning Warp3D for MorphOS, I doubt that's going to change any time soon.
Interview with Fleecy : Comment 167 of 236ANN.lu
Posted by Nicolas Sallin on 06-May-2002 10:04 GMT
In reply to Comment 166 (Ben Hermans/Hyperion):
It's real fun to see an egocentric believing people are always talking about themselves, like he uses to do.
Otherwise, no I can't read your mails on OS 4 mailing list. It is illegal, didn't you know ?
Luckily, in Belgium it's not illegal to spread wrong informations to people subscribed to such private mailing lists.
BTW, was it in 1999 that Petro gave you illegal AmigaOS sources you used to develop Hyperion's products ? :-)
Too bad I started to sleep right away after the start of your talks. But don't worry, I was in good shape when you talked the other times.
Interview with Fleecy : Comment 168 of 236ANN.lu
Posted by Jose on 06-May-2002 10:16 GMT
In reply to Comment 164 (Ben Hermans/Hyperion):
": OS 4 is nearly entirely source-code compatible with OS 3.x. Thomas Frieden estimates the compatibility at 95%. "
ehe great!
Interview with Fleecy : Comment 169 of 236ANN.lu
Posted by Björn Hagström on 06-May-2002 10:20 GMT
In reply to Comment 167 (Nicolas Sallin):
I'm sorry to say this, but you are acting like a joke Mr Nicolas Sallin.
/Björn
Interview with Fleecy : Comment 170 of 236ANN.lu
Posted by Nicolas Sallin on 06-May-2002 10:33 GMT
In reply to Comment 169 (Björn Hagström):
Please Björn, don't reply so early. Let Benjamin Hermans outputing more distorded facts and insults first.
Interview with Fleecy : Comment 171 of 236ANN.lu
Posted by Björn Hagström on 06-May-2002 10:35 GMT
In reply to Comment 170 (Nicolas Sallin):
Please Mr Nicolas Sallin, look at yourself and analyse how you are acting. Know yourself.
/Björn
Interview with Fleecy : Comment 172 of 236ANN.lu
Posted by Don Cox on 06-May-2002 10:39 GMT
In reply to Comment 164 (Ben Hermans/Hyperion):
"Nothing wrong with Linux but selling something called "AmigaOne" to end-users with only Linux isn't something Eyetech
wants to do and I think we can only commend them for that. "
However, there could be a small but profitable market selling the same
board as a LinuxOne - and they could be doing this while they wait for
AOS 4 to be ready.
Interview with Fleecy : Comment 173 of 236ANN.lu
Posted by Nicolas Sallin on 06-May-2002 10:53 GMT
In reply to Comment 171 (Björn Hagström):
Please Björn, understand I dont care if an unknown like myself could look idiot for some people.
For each true fact I present to Benjamin Hermans, he can't resist to output two lies while trying to make him look as the Amiga saviour.
But now I think this is over for this time, and Benjamin will not reply again.
Too bad, I know he could still make growing the list of legal cases against him, if he really wanted.
Interview with Fleecy : Comment 174 of 236ANN.lu
Posted by Björn Hagström on 06-May-2002 11:10 GMT
In reply to Comment 173 (Nicolas Sallin):
Unfortunately though sir, the only thing you achieve is to put yourself on the "yet another rambling troll"-list.
/Björn
Interview with Fleecy : Comment 175 of 236ANN.lu
Posted by Alkemyst on 06-May-2002 11:13 GMT
In reply to Comment 173 (Nicolas Sallin):
i dont come here to read about your legal views on anything pls email ben with them view directly.
i also dont come here to see a thread turn into whats the best way to code class either.
Interview with Fleecy : Comment 176 of 236ANN.lu
Posted by Sharwin & Rakesh Raghoebardayal on 06-May-2002 13:34 GMT
In reply to Comment 166 (Ben Hermans/Hyperion):
> Yes ofcourse because you know because you were involved in the MorphOS - Amiga
> discussions, you were there when I talked to Petro in Cologne in 1999, you were there
> when I visited the Thendic offices late 2001, you were there when I talked to Gerald
> Carda in Neuss in 2000 or in Cologne, in November 2001.
Ben, please stop spreading false information like this. There was no
"Nicolas Sallin" here in the Thendic office when you came over to visit us here.
Bill, Raquel, Thierry, Eric, Nadia and Rakesh and I were here and there was
nobody else (except all the others you met in our other office). Your statements are
far from professional. You have a full-time job, but sometimes it makes us
believe that your job is posting messages on the bulletin boards 24
hours a day. Can we be more professional and go to the next step, okay?
> And you are subscribed to the OS 4 mailing list and have access to all
> my e-mails.
Sharwin is (or was) subscribed to the OS 4 mailing list, not somebody
called Nicolas Sallin, as far as we know. We had two private messages from
Nicolas a while ago, but that is all. However, we must admit that his projects
are pretty interesting and he would perhaps be a welcome addition to our
team.
In the end, the only thing that counts are the products, not the words.
We all have one dream in mind and it does not make sense to ramble like
this. The low-level documents we did send you concerning the CSPPC have
helped you out with booting OS4 in a clean way -- this is because we all
want to progress! You are not if you keep ranting as you do on these
boards. Let's support each other in different way.
These are not things we should discuss in a public forum. If you have
anything to tell us you know our email addresses and phone numbers.
Best regards,
Sharwin & Rakesh Raghoebardayal
Interview with Fleecy : Comment 177 of 236ANN.lu
Posted by wouter on 06-May-2002 13:44 GMT
In reply to Comment 176 (Sharwin & Rakesh Raghoebardayal):
Dear brothers (didn't you write for het nederlandse Amiga Magazine en Sharwin, was jij niet diegene die dat coole artikel schreef over de Amiga demoscene in het laatste nummer van Amiga Magazine :))
Anyway, this was just the point that Ben was trying to make, i think :)
bye
Interview with Fleecy : Comment 178 of 236ANN.lu
Posted by Samface on 06-May-2002 13:57 GMT
In reply to Comment 173 (Nicolas Sallin):
I think I have to agree with Björn. The way you are acting does not help your cause. On the contrary, what you say about Ben Hermans is what I'm starting to think about you.
Please stop this personal vendetta nonsense and stick to the point beeing made; Ben just did a very good job at slaying these pro-MOS ruomor attacks.
What really cracks me up is when people actually think that I or anyone else would believe them instead of Mr Hermans. Yes Frodon, that one was aimed at you. I mean, what I see is "someone" making a claim on the internet and then I see Ben Hermans from Hyperion completely dismissing the entire concept. Now, who would you believe? My advice to the pro-MOS guys is; prove it or shut it.
Interview with Fleecy : Comment 179 of 236ANN.lu
Posted by Samface on 06-May-2002 13:58 GMT
In reply to Comment 176 (Sharwin & Rakesh Raghoebardayal):
He was beeing ironic. What you just said was actually the point he was trying to get across, ok?
Interview with Fleecy : Comment 180 of 236ANN.lu
Posted by Anders Kjeldsen on 06-May-2002 14:05 GMT
In reply to Comment 175 (Alkemyst):
Tell me, why DO you read forums like this?
Interview with Fleecy : Comment 181 of 236ANN.lu
Posted by Anders Kjeldsen on 06-May-2002 14:07 GMT
In reply to Comment 176 (Sharwin & Rakesh Raghoebardayal):
I -think- Ben Hermans was kind of IRONIC in that post.
Try reading it again :)
Interview with Fleecy : Comment 182 of 236ANN.lu
Posted by Anders Kjeldsen on 06-May-2002 14:09 GMT
In reply to Comment 178 (Samface):
Yes, you've proven a lot with the postings of URLs to pages you don't understand the content of :)
Interview with Fleecy : Comment 183 of 236ANN.lu
Posted by Sharwin & Rakesh Raghoebardayal on 06-May-2002 14:10 GMT
In reply to Comment 177 (wouter):
Yes, you are right! :-) We wrote for Amiga Magazine until they sadly had to close down. Hopefully one day very soon they will be back... ;-)
Best regards,
Sharwin & Rakesh
Interview with Fleecy : Comment 184 of 236ANN.lu
Posted by Anders Kjeldsen on 06-May-2002 14:20 GMT
In reply to Comment 43 (Ben Hermans/Hyperion):
I guess that if he didn't believe you in the first place, he WOULD belive you now as you told him that the size was 127kb :)
Interview with Fleecy : Comment 185 of 236ANN.lu
Posted by amigammc on 06-May-2002 14:21 GMT
In reply to Comment 176 (Sharwin & Rakesh Raghoebardayal):
>Ben, please stop spreading false information like this. There was no
>"Nicolas Sallin" here in the Thendic office when you came over to visit
>us here.
Eeeh?!?! Have you ever heard of something called "sarcasm" ?
Anwyay, thanks for confirming Ben's words.
Interview with Fleecy : Comment 186 of 236ANN.lu
Posted by Anders Kjeldsen on 06-May-2002 14:21 GMT
In reply to Comment 103 (Ben Hermans/Hyperion):
>This is due to various reasons as I've pointed out before: integration of most
>4.2 features in 4.0, problems with access to the 3.9 source-code, change in
>the AmigaOne design which no longer has chipset access etc.
So, what DID you have ready in November 2001 ?
Interview with Fleecy : Comment 187 of 236ANN.lu
Posted by amigammc on 06-May-2002 14:24 GMT
In reply to Comment 176 (Sharwin & Rakesh Raghoebardayal):
>These are not things we should discuss in a public forum.
And yet you do...
And accuse Ben of being unprofessional with stupid statements like "You have a full time job, yet..."
But I guess it's way easier to be inconsistent and see other people's things than our own.
Need a hint? Follow your own advice.
Interview with Fleecy : Comment 188 of 236ANN.lu
Posted by Samface on 06-May-2002 14:32 GMT
In reply to Comment 182 (Anders Kjeldsen):
The real question would be; did the people trying to disapprove me understand the content?
Interview with Fleecy : Comment 189 of 236ANN.lu
Posted by Ben Hermans/Hyperion on 06-May-2002 14:35 GMT
In reply to Comment 176 (Sharwin & Rakesh Raghoebardayal):
Sharwin, this was irony.
I was exactly making the point that Nicolas Sallin or Hennes was not privy to any discussions of any importance directly nor any confidential information regarding OS 4.
Ofcourse he wasn't there at your offices.
That was what I meant in the first place.
Interview with Fleecy : Comment 190 of 236ANN.lu
Posted by Samface on 06-May-2002 14:40 GMT
In reply to Comment 186 (Anders Kjeldsen):
Why do you even ask? I mean, he explained that there were major changes in the plans due to hardware as well as software issues which means that it would be in vain if anything was to be completed at that time and it wouldn't affect where they are today. So tell me, what is it that you're trying to achieve by this?
Interview with Fleecy : Comment 191 of 236ANN.lu
Posted by Frodon on 06-May-2002 14:41 GMT
Hello Samface,
"Yes Frodon, that one was aimed at you. I mean, what I see is "someone" making a claim on the internet and then I see Ben Hermans from Hyperion completely dismissing the entire concept."
I've explained with more details what frustrated me in the Hermans dates politic in the post 151 because he didn't understood correctly my point of you but he didn't answered it yet. So don't say he dismissed it. He dismissed something that he has misunderstood, not what I really wanted to say ;-)
Regards
Interview with Fleecy : Comment 192 of 236ANN.lu
Posted by Ben Hermans/Hyperion on 06-May-2002 14:41 GMT
In reply to Comment 186 (Anders Kjeldsen):
>So, what DID you have ready in November 2001 ?
Hyperion itself? Nothing beyond design documents for a new InputAPI and for a new version of Warp3D.
At that point things like the new FFS2 or Roadshow were already done.
And other stuff by third parties such as P96, XAD etc.
Almos was already working on Petunia since late 2000.
Remember, we only took over November 1, 2001 but we didn't start from scratch.
Interview with Fleecy : Comment 193 of 236ANN.lu
Posted by Sharwin & Rakesh Raghoebardayal on 06-May-2002 14:46 GMT
In reply to Comment 189 (Ben Hermans/Hyperion):
Dear Ben,
It seems we must have misunderstood each other and there are quite a few others who did as well.
Why do many of those people post messages if they have nothing intelligent to say? Maybe it is better to ignore them at some points.
Anyway, sorry for the misunderstanding.
Best regards,
Sharwin & Rakesh
Interview with Fleecy : Comment 194 of 236ANN.lu
Posted by Anders Kjeldsen on 06-May-2002 14:51 GMT
In reply to Comment 190 (Samface):
>Why do you even ask? I mean, he explained that there were major changes in the
>plans due to hardware as well as software issues which means that it would be
>in vain if anything was to be completed at that time and it wouldn't affect
>where they are today. So tell me, what is it that you're trying to achieve by
>this?
Well, I asked HIM, for one.
To me, the question is relevant, as a potential AmigaOS4-customer. I can't quite remember what happened back there in November 2001. But since that deadline was 6 months ago, there must have been SOMETHING ready? I sort of remember mr. Ami Fan saying that he'd seen a piece of AmigaOS4 at an Amiga Conference, probably over a year ago. (Maybe he remembers it better himself ;) )
- How much was ready in November 2001?
- When did they realise they wouldn't make it?
- When did we get to know? November 2001?
- Could the same thing happen again, and it would be delayed another 6-8 months?
To be able to believe in the AmigaOS4 project (believe that it's going to be released within the next 2-6 months) I need to be convinced by some smart words by Ben Hermans, for instance. Now, he's probably happy if he can convince those 60% who don't care as long as they can believe in SOMETHING :)
Interview with Fleecy : Comment 195 of 236ANN.lu
Posted by Frodon on 06-May-2002 14:55 GMT
In reply to Comment 193 (Sharwin & Rakesh Raghoebardayal):
Hi Sharwin & Rakesh,
Just to say you hi ;-) And welcome to the ANN world ;-)
Regards
--
Bertrand PRESLES
Interview with Fleecy : Comment 196 of 236ANN.lu
Posted by Nicolas Sallin on 06-May-2002 15:09 GMT
In reply to Comment 189 (Ben Hermans/Hyperion):
Mister Benjamin Hermans,
"If you can't even spell the name of somebody you are making fun of,
you are indeed pretty sad and most likely American because the
educational system is so poor there most people never get around to
being able to spell correctly."
Think about it.
Interview with Fleecy : Comment 197 of 236ANN.lu
Posted by Samface on 06-May-2002 15:19 GMT
In reply to Comment 191 (Frodon):
Ben, Frodon wrote me a personal letter where he said exactly this:
[REMOVED ON ORIGINAL AUTHOR'S REQUEST - CK]
Of course I don't believe this. But, as it seems that Frodon isn't satisfied with telling only me this, would you please care to correct this little rumour once and for all? Thank you.
Interview with Fleecy : Comment 198 of 236ANN.lu
Posted by Samface on 06-May-2002 15:23 GMT
In reply to Comment 194 (Anders Kjeldsen):
Read post #192.
Interview with Fleecy : Comment 199 of 236ANN.lu
Posted by Samface on 06-May-2002 15:24 GMT
In reply to Comment 196 (Nicolas Sallin):
Who is that a quote from, if I may ask?
Interview with Fleecy : Comment 200 of 236ANN.lu
Posted by Kronos on 06-May-2002 15:29 GMT
In reply to Comment 199 (Samface):
Seems to be that remark Ben had for
Darklite some months ago.
Interview with Fleecy : Comment 201 of 236ANN.lu
Posted by Kronos on 06-May-2002 15:33 GMT
In reply to Comment 197 (Samface):
Reposting private e-mails into a public
forum is a absolute "Don't do it" thing.
Frodon decided to put that in a private
e-mail and not in this forum for some
reason and you should at least respect
his desicion on this.
If you don't believe him, fine just delete
the e-mail, have a good laugh and forget
it.
Anonymous, there are 236 items in your selection (but only 86 shown due to limitation) [1 - 50] [51 - 100] [101 - 150] [151 - 200] [201 - 236]
Back to Top