13-Jun-2024 10:23 GMT.
[News] Greenboy (Phoenix) interviewedANN.lu
Posted on 02-Feb-2000 08:38 GMT by Christian Kemp29 comments
View flat
View list
John Chandler and Czech publication Amiga Review interviewed Greenboy, the Phoenix "facilitator at large". You can read the first part here, there will be three more parts over the next three weeks.
List of all comments to this article
Sorted by date, most recent at bottom
Comment 1John Chandler01-Feb-2000 23:00 GMT
Comment 2Teemu I. Yliselä01-Feb-2000 23:00 GMT
Comment 3anon01-Feb-2000 23:00 GMT
Comment 4anon01-Feb-2000 23:00 GMT
Comment 5OrangeBoy01-Feb-2000 23:00 GMT
Comment 6Mike01-Feb-2000 23:00 GMT
Comment 7Mike01-Feb-2000 23:00 GMT
Comment 8Mario Saitti02-Feb-2000 23:00 GMT
Greenboy (Phoenix) interviewed : Comment 9 of 29ANN.lu
Posted by Mario Saitti on 02-Feb-2000 23:00 GMT
In reply to Comment 5 (OrangeBoy):
> Wow, I'm sure many people here will love to see themselves defined
> "Gatemiga sycophants" just for not having shared some people's
> chronic pessimism at a time when there was no evident reason
> not to trust Amiga Inc.
And I am sure greenboy is impressed by the number of people who took that remark to mean themelves:) The gatemiga sycophants know who they are and what they did to be labelled so.
> A lot of people trusted them in good faith, since they WERE showing
> good signs. After all, not everyone can have inside information.
> I could understand these people being called "misled", maybe even
> "naive". But "sycophants"? This is downright offensive.
Only if you are one of them:) The statement refers to folks who did everything they could to oppose the rebellion forming against Amiga under Gateway, people who knew Amiga was blowing smoke but pretended things were great. For instance there were people who knew Amiga was not the MMC, and thus knew Jim Collas had not been entirely honest. Yet they were willing to lie about this in the hope of being employed by Amiga inc at the expense of others.
There were people who knew Jim Collas was under fire from Gateway, and was going to be removed from the picture entirely. Yet they continued to lie about the situation. It was known they were lying, but noone could not speak about it, since they had to preserve the anonymity of the souces within Amiga. They are the Gatemiga Sycophants. Are you one of them:)
> How arrogant. These guys still have to work a LOT on Public Relations
Of course, there is a lot more to be done than just this though.
TopPrevious commentNext commentbottom
List of all comments to this article (continued)
Comment 10anon02-Feb-2000 23:00 GMT
Comment 11John Chandler02-Feb-2000 23:00 GMT
Comment 12anon02-Feb-2000 23:00 GMT
Comment 13anon02-Feb-2000 23:00 GMT
Comment 14metaljoe@snowcrash.u-net.com02-Feb-2000 23:00 GMT
Comment 15John Chandler02-Feb-2000 23:00 GMT
Comment 16Mario Saitti02-Feb-2000 23:00 GMT
Comment 17Mike02-Feb-2000 23:00 GMT
Comment 18clash bowley02-Feb-2000 23:00 GMT
Comment 19Detective Bunny02-Feb-2000 23:00 GMT
Comment 20greenboy02-Feb-2000 23:00 GMT
Comment 21John Block03-Feb-2000 23:00 GMT
Comment 22John Block03-Feb-2000 23:00 GMT
Comment 23John Block03-Feb-2000 23:00 GMT
Comment 24John Block03-Feb-2000 23:00 GMT
Comment 25John Block03-Feb-2000 23:00 GMT
Comment 26John Block03-Feb-2000 23:00 GMT
Comment 27Mario Saitti03-Feb-2000 23:00 GMT
Comment 28John Block03-Feb-2000 23:00 GMT
Comment 29Mario Saitti03-Feb-2000 23:00 GMT
Back to Top