27-Apr-2024 10:11 GMT.
UNDER CONSTRUCTION
[Web] Amiga-news.de asks: which system for 2002ANN.lu
Posted on 25-Oct-2001 15:37 GMT by Teemu I. Yliselä76 comments
View flat
View list
Amiga-news.de are conducting a poll about what computer platform Amigans would most want to use in the year 2002.


Click here to vote
List of all comments to this article
Sorted by date, most recent at bottom
Comment 1Anonymous25-Oct-2001 14:08 GMT
Comment 2Troels Ersking25-Oct-2001 14:48 GMT
Comment 3Graham25-Oct-2001 16:02 GMT
Comment 4David Scheibler25-Oct-2001 16:08 GMT
Comment 5Mark Olsen25-Oct-2001 16:13 GMT
Comment 6Brecht (darklite)25-Oct-2001 16:24 GMT
Comment 7AmiFreak25-Oct-2001 17:00 GMT
Comment 8John Adkins25-Oct-2001 17:25 GMT
Comment 9Anonymous25-Oct-2001 17:25 GMT
Comment 10ehaines25-Oct-2001 17:25 GMT
Comment 11David Scheibler25-Oct-2001 17:41 GMT
Comment 12Wilhelm25-Oct-2001 17:45 GMT
Comment 13David Scheibler25-Oct-2001 17:49 GMT
Comment 14David Scheibler25-Oct-2001 17:51 GMT
Comment 15Dave25-Oct-2001 17:54 GMT
Comment 16Don Cox25-Oct-2001 18:27 GMT
Comment 17Don Cox25-Oct-2001 18:31 GMT
Comment 18John Adkins25-Oct-2001 19:14 GMT
Comment 19Troels Ersking25-Oct-2001 19:27 GMT
Comment 20Anonymous25-Oct-2001 19:33 GMT
Amiga-news.de asks: which system for 2002 : Comment 21 of 76ANN.lu
Posted by Graham on 25-Oct-2001 19:33 GMT
In reply to Comment 9 (Anonymous):
I am just sick and tired of MorphOS weenies having to post an anti-Amiga Inc or anti-Eyetech post at the beginning of every story, whatever the topic. So I base my opinion of MorphOS users on what I read, and I don't like what I read.
And it was quite clear that the first post was an attack against Eyetech with unfounded arguments by an Anonymous person. This correlates strongly with past posts by MorphOS users or people tagging onto the MorphOS camp to attack Amiga/Eyetech/H&P.
As to the person who told me to go back to the AmigaOne mailing list. This site is a site currently for Amiga computers. AmigaOne. A1200. A4000. A1000. etc. MorphOS is not licensed to use the Amiga name. Hence I have more rights to be here, talking about Amigas and Amiga's future. If Christian wants to rename the site "MorphOS News International" then fine. But don't you tell me what to do because you *possibly* made an anti-eyetech post as an anonymous user and didn't like the result.
If you want intelligent discussion about MorphOS, don't start by attacking their competitors. It is the first way to discourage possible customers, because consumers do not like to see that.
I am most likely going to be flamed by a load of MorphOS users now for saying this. Maybe you should think before you post - it isn't hard. Any gibberish, rude, insulting, etc posts will be ignored, as the poster will not have a brain and can consider themselves an official "MorphOS Weenie". Any posts saying one or the other is vapor will also be ignored, as neither product is yet selling to the end customer (yes, I am aware of the demonstration of MorphOS at the Italian show).
Jump...
#23 David Scheibler #27 David Scheibler #39 Ralph Schmidt
TopPrevious commentNext commentbottom
List of all comments to this article (continued)
Comment 22Kay Are Ulvestad25-Oct-2001 19:44 GMT
Comment 23David Scheibler25-Oct-2001 19:44 GMT
Comment 24anonymouse25-Oct-2001 19:46 GMT
Comment 25David Scheibler25-Oct-2001 19:49 GMT
Comment 26Kay Are Ulvestad25-Oct-2001 19:54 GMT
Comment 27David Scheibler25-Oct-2001 20:00 GMT
Comment 28Brecht (darklite)25-Oct-2001 20:07 GMT
Comment 29Kay Are Ulvestad25-Oct-2001 20:20 GMT
Comment 30Kelly Samel25-Oct-2001 20:23 GMT
Comment 31Kay Are Ulvestad25-Oct-2001 20:24 GMT
Comment 32MAd Dr. Z25-Oct-2001 20:41 GMT
Comment 33Mad Dr. Z25-Oct-2001 20:43 GMT
Comment 34Floyd Dameron25-Oct-2001 20:45 GMT
Comment 35Brecht (darklite)25-Oct-2001 21:03 GMT
Comment 36Mad Dr. Z25-Oct-2001 21:05 GMT
Comment 37Mad Dr. Z25-Oct-2001 21:10 GMT
Comment 38Graham25-Oct-2001 21:23 GMT
Comment 39Ralph Schmidt25-Oct-2001 22:58 GMT
Comment 40Graham25-Oct-2001 23:19 GMT
Comment 41Ralph Schmidt25-Oct-2001 23:33 GMT
Comment 42wilhelm26-Oct-2001 00:42 GMT
Comment 43mark26-Oct-2001 01:27 GMT
Comment 44A NoN a Moose26-Oct-2001 01:58 GMT
Comment 45Jack Perry26-Oct-2001 02:28 GMT
Comment 46Solar (BAUD)26-Oct-2001 04:33 GMT
Comment 47Solar (BAUD)26-Oct-2001 04:35 GMT
Comment 48Dave26-Oct-2001 05:15 GMT
Comment 49Samface26-Oct-2001 05:57 GMT
Comment 50Dave26-Oct-2001 05:59 GMT
Comment 51special26-Oct-2001 06:03 GMT
Comment 52Samface26-Oct-2001 07:15 GMT
Comment 53Don Cox26-Oct-2001 07:24 GMT
Comment 54David Scheibler26-Oct-2001 08:00 GMT
Comment 55Sinan26-Oct-2001 08:05 GMT
Comment 56Solar (BAUD)26-Oct-2001 08:35 GMT
Comment 57Anonymous26-Oct-2001 09:08 GMT
Comment 58Samface26-Oct-2001 09:10 GMT
Comment 59Samface26-Oct-2001 09:37 GMT
Comment 60Solar (BAUD)26-Oct-2001 09:47 GMT
Comment 61Samface26-Oct-2001 09:58 GMT
Comment 62Anonymous26-Oct-2001 11:08 GMT
Comment 63Adam Waldenberg26-Oct-2001 12:32 GMT
Comment 64Samface26-Oct-2001 12:43 GMT
Comment 65Samface26-Oct-2001 12:52 GMT
Comment 66Anonymous26-Oct-2001 13:38 GMT
Comment 67Anonymous26-Oct-2001 13:41 GMT
Comment 68Samface26-Oct-2001 14:05 GMT
Comment 69Dave26-Oct-2001 14:12 GMT
Comment 70David Scheibler26-Oct-2001 14:35 GMT
Comment 71Anonymous26-Oct-2001 14:41 GMT
Comment 72Anonymous26-Oct-2001 14:48 GMT
Comment 73CyberZorro26-Oct-2001 16:49 GMT
Comment 74Brecht (darklite)26-Oct-2001 17:03 GMT
Comment 75Brecht (darklite)26-Oct-2001 17:05 GMT
Comment 76Emmanuel Lesueur26-Oct-2001 18:59 GMT
Back to Top