26-Apr-2024 10:58 GMT.
UNDER CONSTRUCTION
[News] Project Petunia FAQANN.lu
Posted on 19-Aug-2002 15:25 GMT by Álmos Rajnai68 comments
View flat
View list

Project Petunia (AmigaOS4 JIT emulator) pages updated and extended with a FAQ.

Project Petunia pages (the emulator, that will be used in AmigaOS4) updated and extended with a FAQ.


After a long period of checking forums, chatboards and answering e-mails I decided to add a FAQ part into the project page. I hope I can clean up all the important questions arising in you. If something is not clear enough feel free to write a mail.


Project Petunia pages
List of all comments to this article
Sorted by date, most recent at bottom
Comment 1Anonymous19-Aug-2002 13:59 GMT
Comment 2.john19-Aug-2002 14:49 GMT
Project Petunia FAQ : Comment 3 of 68ANN.lu
Posted by PaulT on 19-Aug-2002 15:04 GMT
Comments directed at the author, but any other constructive comment is invited.
1) As far as it being part of OS4, great! 68K emulation is a must-have feature, obviously. But it seems strange to me that your effort, no matter how brilliant, is being depended on for such an important part of the OS. I can only hope that your wonderful programming accomplishment, done mostly by only one person, is not the reason for the delay of the release of OS4 and A1. In such a situation more money and programmers should have been put to work to move the project forward. This is only a criticism of those who are in charge of OS4, not of you! You are showing that even in today's world it is possible for a "lone gunman" to make a difference, this is great. But Amiga is falling further behind the real world every month.
2) You commented that, speed-wise, emulating an 060 on PPC233 should be possible. Well, when Apple went to PPC in 1994 or so, they had an emulator. On the 60 MHz 601 it was somewhat slower than a 68040 Mac. A 50MHz 060 is maybe twice or three times as fast as the 040's, but a PPC233 is much more than four times as fast as a 601. What is my point? That the emulator problem was solved, as far as pure 68040 code, in 1994. Why do you have to re-invent the wheel? (again, this is more of a criticism of Amiga management.)
Jump...
#18 Álmos Rajnai #32 Bill T.
TopPrevious commentNext commentbottom
List of all comments to this article (continued)
Comment 4strobe19-Aug-2002 15:47 GMT
Comment 5z519-Aug-2002 16:12 GMT
Comment 6strobe19-Aug-2002 16:53 GMT
Comment 7JoannaK19-Aug-2002 17:07 GMT
Comment 8Joe "Floid" Kanowitz19-Aug-2002 17:26 GMT
Comment 9Bill Hoggett19-Aug-2002 18:36 GMT
Comment 10Marcus Sundman19-Aug-2002 23:00 GMT
Comment 11Bill Hoggett19-Aug-2002 23:36 GMT
Comment 12Marcus Sundman20-Aug-2002 00:03 GMT
Comment 13Nicolas Sallin20-Aug-2002 03:29 GMT
Comment 14.john20-Aug-2002 04:59 GMT
Comment 15.john20-Aug-2002 05:01 GMT
Comment 16Joe "Floid" Kanowitz20-Aug-2002 05:28 GMT
Comment 17Ben Hermans/Hyperion20-Aug-2002 05:39 GMT
Comment 18Álmos Rajnai20-Aug-2002 06:23 GMT
Comment 19Álmos Rajnai20-Aug-2002 06:41 GMT
Comment 20Alfred Schwarz20-Aug-2002 06:52 GMT
Comment 21Mark Smith20-Aug-2002 07:49 GMT
Comment 22priest20-Aug-2002 07:51 GMT
Comment 23JoannaK20-Aug-2002 08:07 GMT
Comment 24Ben Hermans/Hyperion20-Aug-2002 08:25 GMT
Comment 25Anonymous20-Aug-2002 09:46 GMT
Comment 26Jon20-Aug-2002 09:49 GMT
Comment 27Anonymous20-Aug-2002 10:30 GMT
Comment 28priest20-Aug-2002 11:17 GMT
Comment 29Kjetil20-Aug-2002 11:30 GMT
Comment 30Don Cox20-Aug-2002 11:57 GMT
Comment 31Anonymous20-Aug-2002 11:59 GMT
Comment 32Bill T.20-Aug-2002 12:32 GMT
Comment 33Bill Toner20-Aug-2002 12:42 GMT
Comment 34Nicolas Sallin20-Aug-2002 17:36 GMT
Comment 35Jon20-Aug-2002 18:08 GMT
Comment 36PaulT20-Aug-2002 18:28 GMT
Comment 37Anonymous20-Aug-2002 20:12 GMT
Comment 38Anonymous20-Aug-2002 20:17 GMT
Comment 39Hammer20-Aug-2002 23:47 GMT
Comment 40Álmos Rajnai21-Aug-2002 07:35 GMT
Comment 41Anonymous21-Aug-2002 09:13 GMT
Comment 42Ben Hermans/Hyperion21-Aug-2002 09:29 GMT
Comment 43Nicholai Benalal21-Aug-2002 09:31 GMT
Comment 44Don Cox21-Aug-2002 09:32 GMT
Comment 45Jon21-Aug-2002 10:05 GMT
Comment 46anon21-Aug-2002 11:50 GMT
Comment 47Nicolas Sallin21-Aug-2002 11:52 GMT
Comment 48Jon21-Aug-2002 14:14 GMT
Comment 49Nicolas Sallin21-Aug-2002 15:09 GMT
Comment 50JoannaK21-Aug-2002 19:08 GMT
Comment 51Anonymous21-Aug-2002 20:25 GMT
Comment 52Anonymous21-Aug-2002 20:31 GMT
Comment 53Ole-Egil22-Aug-2002 04:21 GMT
Comment 54Ben Hermans/Hyperion22-Aug-2002 06:04 GMT
Comment 55Álmos Rajnai22-Aug-2002 06:49 GMT
Comment 56Kjetil22-Aug-2002 09:01 GMT
Comment 57Kjetil22-Aug-2002 09:12 GMT
Comment 58Jon22-Aug-2002 09:27 GMT
Comment 59Jon22-Aug-2002 09:28 GMT
Comment 60kjetil22-Aug-2002 09:46 GMT
Comment 61Bill Hoggett22-Aug-2002 10:03 GMT
Comment 62Alkis Tsapanidis22-Aug-2002 11:42 GMT
Comment 63Jon22-Aug-2002 12:29 GMT
Comment 64Nicolas Sallin22-Aug-2002 12:54 GMT
Comment 65Nicolas Sallin22-Aug-2002 13:03 GMT
Comment 66Anonymous22-Aug-2002 13:46 GMT
Comment 67Kjetil23-Aug-2002 05:03 GMT
Comment 68Kjetil23-Aug-2002 06:49 GMT
Back to Top