27-Apr-2024 04:26 GMT.
UNDER CONSTRUCTION
[News] Project Petunia FAQANN.lu
Posted on 19-Aug-2002 15:25 GMT by Álmos Rajnai68 comments
View flat
View list

Project Petunia (AmigaOS4 JIT emulator) pages updated and extended with a FAQ.

Project Petunia pages (the emulator, that will be used in AmigaOS4) updated and extended with a FAQ.


After a long period of checking forums, chatboards and answering e-mails I decided to add a FAQ part into the project page. I hope I can clean up all the important questions arising in you. If something is not clear enough feel free to write a mail.


Project Petunia pages
List of all comments to this article
Sorted by date, most recent at bottom
Comment 1Anonymous19-Aug-2002 13:59 GMT
Comment 2.john19-Aug-2002 14:49 GMT
Comment 3PaulT19-Aug-2002 15:04 GMT
Comment 4strobe19-Aug-2002 15:47 GMT
Comment 5z519-Aug-2002 16:12 GMT
Comment 6strobe19-Aug-2002 16:53 GMT
Comment 7JoannaK19-Aug-2002 17:07 GMT
Project Petunia FAQ : Comment 8 of 68ANN.lu
Posted by Joe "Floid" Kanowitz on 19-Aug-2002 17:26 GMT
In reply to Comment 7 (JoannaK):
JoannaK said,
>It's a pitty there have to be at least 3 different 68kJit emulators on the
>works at the same time. But hey.. we all can afford reinventation of wheel,
>delays, lack of coders etc.. No need to share with others, even when they are
>years ahead of you. :)
Well, it comes down to a difference of opinion. MOS sounds like it's going for the full-bore OS/2 solution (seperate VMs), while this "task-based" concept Petunia uses sounds suspiciously like the Win'95 approach. OS4 has always been positioned as the highly compatible route, so it makes some sense. (I'm not really sure how well I'm reading his description of the 'task-based' approach; it may be that he's saying this is a trick to achieve Win'9x-like compatibility while maintaining stability, or I could just be totally off on the way Win'9x handles its DOS boxes...)
I think I 'trust' the MOS approach more, personally, but since getting back in touch with oldschool games will be one of the few 'killer apps' for any "Amiga" platform at launch, I'm not going to mind too much. Unlike with DOS, there's actually 'Classic' software still worth running after you've moved to the 'modern' system. ;)
>I was honestly hoping they (Hyperion/Ainc) would use Bernies code to OS4 cause
>he have made this all once allready, and he's having working solution to most
>of issues... But apparently I was hoping too much.
Bernie's sounds as tuned to x86 as anything else out there on the UAE JIT front. It might take more effort to 'port' it than to simply write a new one for PPC. However, I gather that he's reimplemented some OS libraries to target x86, and that miiight mean some useful GCC cleanup/reimplementation work's been done there, if he wasn't handcoding assembler.
Jump...
#9 Bill Hoggett #13 Nicolas Sallin #15 .john #17 Ben Hermans/Hyperion
TopPrevious commentNext commentbottom
List of all comments to this article (continued)
Comment 9Bill Hoggett19-Aug-2002 18:36 GMT
Comment 10Marcus Sundman19-Aug-2002 23:00 GMT
Comment 11Bill Hoggett19-Aug-2002 23:36 GMT
Comment 12Marcus Sundman20-Aug-2002 00:03 GMT
Comment 13Nicolas Sallin20-Aug-2002 03:29 GMT
Comment 14.john20-Aug-2002 04:59 GMT
Comment 15.john20-Aug-2002 05:01 GMT
Comment 16Joe "Floid" Kanowitz20-Aug-2002 05:28 GMT
Comment 17Ben Hermans/Hyperion20-Aug-2002 05:39 GMT
Comment 18Álmos Rajnai20-Aug-2002 06:23 GMT
Comment 19Álmos Rajnai20-Aug-2002 06:41 GMT
Comment 20Alfred Schwarz20-Aug-2002 06:52 GMT
Comment 21Mark Smith20-Aug-2002 07:49 GMT
Comment 22priest20-Aug-2002 07:51 GMT
Comment 23JoannaK20-Aug-2002 08:07 GMT
Comment 24Ben Hermans/Hyperion20-Aug-2002 08:25 GMT
Comment 25Anonymous20-Aug-2002 09:46 GMT
Comment 26Jon20-Aug-2002 09:49 GMT
Comment 27Anonymous20-Aug-2002 10:30 GMT
Comment 28priest20-Aug-2002 11:17 GMT
Comment 29Kjetil20-Aug-2002 11:30 GMT
Comment 30Don Cox20-Aug-2002 11:57 GMT
Comment 31Anonymous20-Aug-2002 11:59 GMT
Comment 32Bill T.20-Aug-2002 12:32 GMT
Comment 33Bill Toner20-Aug-2002 12:42 GMT
Comment 34Nicolas Sallin20-Aug-2002 17:36 GMT
Comment 35Jon20-Aug-2002 18:08 GMT
Comment 36PaulT20-Aug-2002 18:28 GMT
Comment 37Anonymous20-Aug-2002 20:12 GMT
Comment 38Anonymous20-Aug-2002 20:17 GMT
Comment 39Hammer20-Aug-2002 23:47 GMT
Comment 40Álmos Rajnai21-Aug-2002 07:35 GMT
Comment 41Anonymous21-Aug-2002 09:13 GMT
Comment 42Ben Hermans/Hyperion21-Aug-2002 09:29 GMT
Comment 43Nicholai Benalal21-Aug-2002 09:31 GMT
Comment 44Don Cox21-Aug-2002 09:32 GMT
Comment 45Jon21-Aug-2002 10:05 GMT
Comment 46anon21-Aug-2002 11:50 GMT
Comment 47Nicolas Sallin21-Aug-2002 11:52 GMT
Comment 48Jon21-Aug-2002 14:14 GMT
Comment 49Nicolas Sallin21-Aug-2002 15:09 GMT
Comment 50JoannaK21-Aug-2002 19:08 GMT
Comment 51Anonymous21-Aug-2002 20:25 GMT
Comment 52Anonymous21-Aug-2002 20:31 GMT
Comment 53Ole-Egil22-Aug-2002 04:21 GMT
Comment 54Ben Hermans/Hyperion22-Aug-2002 06:04 GMT
Comment 55Álmos Rajnai22-Aug-2002 06:49 GMT
Comment 56Kjetil22-Aug-2002 09:01 GMT
Comment 57Kjetil22-Aug-2002 09:12 GMT
Comment 58Jon22-Aug-2002 09:27 GMT
Comment 59Jon22-Aug-2002 09:28 GMT
Comment 60kjetil22-Aug-2002 09:46 GMT
Comment 61Bill Hoggett22-Aug-2002 10:03 GMT
Comment 62Alkis Tsapanidis22-Aug-2002 11:42 GMT
Comment 63Jon22-Aug-2002 12:29 GMT
Comment 64Nicolas Sallin22-Aug-2002 12:54 GMT
Comment 65Nicolas Sallin22-Aug-2002 13:03 GMT
Comment 66Anonymous22-Aug-2002 13:46 GMT
Comment 67Kjetil23-Aug-2002 05:03 GMT
Comment 68Kjetil23-Aug-2002 06:49 GMT
Back to Top