26-Apr-2024 05:00 GMT.		 UNDER CONSTRUCTION
Anonymous, there are 1057 items in your selection (but only 757 shown due to limitation) [1 - 50] [51 - 100] [101 - 150] [151 - 200] [201 - 250] [251 - 300] [301 - 350] [351 - 400] [401 - 450] [451 - 500] [More...]
[Motd] Legal threats?ANN.lu
Posted on 06-Apr-2004 07:24 GMT by Christian Kemp (Edited on 2004-04-06 10:09:44 GMT by Christian Kemp)1057 comments
View flat
View list
I am currently being threatened by my former employer (they are "compelled [to] take action against [me]") for the way I am running ANN, and how this allegedly violates my employment contract with them ("interfere _in any manner_ with any business relationship between the Company and any of its customers or business partners"). This might entail drastic changes to the relative freedom of speech ANN has always allowed its visitors, or ANN might close down altogether. Updated 10:00 CET.
Legal threats? : Comment 301 of 1057ANN.lu
Posted by Fabio Alemagna on 06-Apr-2004 16:49 GMT
In reply to Comment 273 (Amon_Re):
> He worded it like that to protect himself.

From what/whom? And how would that protect anyone?
Legal threats? : Comment 302 of 1057ANN.lu
Posted by Darrin on 06-Apr-2004 16:50 GMT
I hate to wander off topic here (but since I’ve done it once in this thread, I figure what the hell), but whatever happened to the Phoenix Consortium that was helping Gensei coordinate the direction of the Pegasos/MOS development? Are they still in the picture or has “Greenboy” slipped quietly away?
Legal threats? : Comment 303 of 1057ANN.lu
Posted by cecilia on 06-Apr-2004 16:50 GMT
we should use this as an opportunity to unite the amiga community. we should only trust the people that have actually DONE something. not people who just talk big.

and i see nothing wrong with someone pointing out that a former employee has not paid them. this is simply stating a fact. an unethical fact. but a fact none the less.

as my teachers used to say, "tell the trust and shame the devil"
Legal threats? : Comment 304 of 1057ANN.lu
Posted by Anonymous on 06-Apr-2004 16:50 GMT
In reply to Comment 44 (pixie):
>I'm shocked!!

I'm not, Buck is a sc*mb*g.
Legal threats? : Comment 305 of 1057ANN.lu
Posted by Fabio Alemagna on 06-Apr-2004 16:51 GMT
In reply to Comment 274 (Amon_Re):
> Wrong, my only intrest is the survival of ann.lu.

And slandering BBRV in what way helps ANN surviving? You mean, that you think that doig precisely the actions that Christian is allegedly considered responsible for, and for which he's allegedly been threatened for, helps him?

You surely need help, if that's what you think.
Legal threats? : Comment 306 of 1057ANN.lu
Posted by Darrin on 06-Apr-2004 16:53 GMT
In reply to Comment 298 (Fabio Alemagna):
>I expect your sincere apologies, nothing less, or else your credibility will
> just go under the drain for what concerns me.

I don't think Bill Hogget's comments have harmed his credibility in any way. However, your statements in this thread and your continued actions in avoiding a logical justification of them have certainly ruined yours.
Legal threats? : Comment 307 of 1057ANN.lu
Posted by Fabio Alemagna on 06-Apr-2004 16:55 GMT
In reply to Comment 293 (Bill Hoggett):
> If Christian had published everything verbatim, Fabio would have criticised him
> for divulging confidential material.

You really sound silly, don't you? I've never asked him to publish the email verbatim, I've asked him to tell the whole story, and to make names, none of which is illegal.

Give it up, bill.
Legal threats? : Comment 308 of 1057ANN.lu
Posted by Darrin on 06-Apr-2004 16:57 GMT
In reply to Comment 305 (Fabio Alemagna):
>And slandering BBRV in what way helps ANN surviving?

It's only slander if it's not true. Please give us some examples of Amon-Re lying to the community via ANN. I can't seem to recall any examples myself, however I do recall being called "a disgusting pervert" (or similar) because I happened to leave a remark in a guest book of a website devoted to old computers...
Legal threats? : Comment 309 of 1057ANN.lu
Posted by Fabio Alemagna on 06-Apr-2004 16:59 GMT
In reply to Comment 306 (Darrin):
> I don't think Bill Hogget's comments have harmed his credibility in any way.

So, making unsubstantiated claims about me don't harm his credibility? Well, this explains a lot.

> However, your statements in this thread and your continued actions in avoiding
> a logical justification of them have certainly ruined yours.

Please, be more clear. Enumerate which statements you are referring to.
Legal threats? : Comment 310 of 1057ANN.lu
Posted by Remco Komduur on 06-Apr-2004 17:00 GMT
In reply to Comment 144 (Fabio Alemagna):
>I don't. I only see a news item that makes no names, Christian that dispels no >doubts, and people who have raged agains BBRV for ages and now find themselves >at home, and think they're free to talk crap as much as they want - without >Christian moderating them down.

Samething happened with AInc. and OS 4 and stuff so don't start complaining now if you didn't complain then.
Legal threats? : Comment 311 of 1057ANN.lu
Posted by Fabio Alemagna on 06-Apr-2004 17:04 GMT
In reply to Comment 310 (Remco Komduur):
> Samething happened with AInc. and OS 4 and stuff so don't start complaining now
> if you didn't complain then.

Except that it wasn't Christian that started it, and except that moderation did happen. Try again.
Legal threats? : Comment 312 of 1057ANN.lu
Posted by Fabio Alemagna on 06-Apr-2004 17:05 GMT
In reply to Comment 308 (Darrin):
> It's only slander if it's not true.

Oh, please, let's not play the "guess the definition" game, eh? Insulting someone the way Amon_Re does is always slander. Period.
Legal threats? : Comment 313 of 1057ANN.lu
Posted by Senex on 06-Apr-2004 17:06 GMT
In reply to Comment 278 (Amon_Re):
> This thread has nothing to do with MOS.

Indeed, but if comments pop up in this thread here (not by you) from trolls speaking about a "wantabe" OS and mainboard, the impression has to be avoided that those who criticized bbrv here would have also spoken against bplan's products as well. My concerns are directed against bbrv's behaviour only, while at the same time I enjoy the Pegasos and the great work the MorphOS team has accomplished.
Legal threats? : Comment 314 of 1057ANN.lu
Posted by Amon_Re on 06-Apr-2004 17:06 GMT
In reply to Comment 290 (Interesting):
I'm not going to buy shares in a company & then sue it to death.

Cheers
Legal threats? : Comment 315 of 1057ANN.lu
Posted by Gregg on 06-Apr-2004 17:08 GMT
In reply to Comment 292 (Interesting):
Yes, you're still here, posting utter drivel. You're a complete waste of space.

Now you try and take credit for something that you had no part in; heck, I'm beginning to suspect that you _are_ actually paid by Buck to drive a misinformation campaign. Your posts are so worthless that their real purpose is to make everyone so exasperated that they can't countenance any more pathetic little yippings about how bad Buck is...

Yes, that must be it. You're unmasked, you tedious fool - now go away.

Gregg
Legal threats? : Comment 316 of 1057ANN.lu
Posted by Sammy Nordström on 06-Apr-2004 17:09 GMT
In reply to Comment 305 (Fabio Alemagna):
Your cause is noble, Fabio, but I'm afraid you're pissing in head wind.
Legal threats? : Comment 317 of 1057ANN.lu
Posted by Amon_Re on 06-Apr-2004 17:11 GMT
In reply to Comment 300 (Fabio Alemagna):
I think it might, and i agree with Bill H. on this.

Cheers
Legal threats? : Comment 318 of 1057ANN.lu
Posted by Amon_Re on 06-Apr-2004 17:12 GMT
In reply to Comment 301 (Fabio Alemagna):
It's been explained already in other posts, i'm not eloqent enough with English to properly explain these things.

Reread Bill H.'s previous posts.

Cheers
Legal threats? : Comment 319 of 1057ANN.lu
Posted by Amon_Re on 06-Apr-2004 17:14 GMT
In reply to Comment 303 (cecilia):
Agreed, this can only bring us closer together.
This is ann.lu we're talking about, one of the few remaining pillars we have in this community.
People of all sides & camps & whatnot should unite & defend themselves, their freedoms & all remaining community sites.

Cheers
Legal threats? : Comment 320 of 1057ANN.lu
Posted by Anonymous on 06-Apr-2004 17:15 GMT
In reply to Comment 273 (Amon_Re):
> He worded it like that to protect himself

That is very convincing - not. The first forty messages of this thread a bizarre. "Wo was it? Fleecy?" "Try again". What's wrong with saying "bbrv has threatened legal action against ann because he thinks we don't behave?" Wouldn't have gotten him into hot waters, would it? And, let's face it, ann is full of threads that insult, degrade, lie, distort and backstab. It actually makes sense to take action against ann: If I was responsible for Hyperion, Amiga Inc. or Genesi, I would have exploded long ago. At some point, it starts to be the site owner's fault if he doesn't reign in the usual suspects (includes you, by the way). Christian tolerates threads that accuse companies of fraud, theft, mafia connections, cheque fraud, customer fraud, credit card fraud, law evasion, even support for shoe bombers. On a ritualistic basis, rather off-handedly, and often without the slightest bit of evidence or proof: The favourite way to start a diatribe these days is "I can only speculate that". Company people are addressed as "frauds", "scumbags" and other niceties. No serious company on this world can tolerate such a site. Warning shot, then sue. Seems to be happening. I speculate (grin) that what causes bbrv's cup to overflow is that the site's owner has started to participate.
Legal threats? : Comment 321 of 1057ANN.lu
Posted by Mr. Anonymous on 06-Apr-2004 17:15 GMT
How can the employment contract apply after employment has been terminated?
Legal threats? : Comment 322 of 1057ANN.lu
Posted by Amon_Re on 06-Apr-2004 17:18 GMT
In reply to Comment 305 (Fabio Alemagna):
That's not what i think, i very much doubt that the comments made here are the cause for this threat.

It's a means to shut Christian up, if it were about slander or libel other sites would be targetted aswell.

Atleast i'm not playing wordgames here.

Cheers
Legal threats? : Comment 323 of 1057ANN.lu
Posted by Amon_Re on 06-Apr-2004 17:19 GMT
In reply to Comment 307 (Fabio Alemagna):
No Fabio, you give it up, Bill H.'s comment was right in the bulls-eye.
You love wordgames.

Cheers
Legal threats? : Comment 324 of 1057ANN.lu
Posted by Amon_Re on 06-Apr-2004 17:21 GMT
In reply to Comment 308 (Darrin):
Darrin, don't get caught in silly games.

Cheers
Legal threats? : Comment 325 of 1057ANN.lu
Posted by Amon_Re on 06-Apr-2004 17:26 GMT
In reply to Comment 312 (Fabio Alemagna):
So it's slander, big fscking deal.
BBRV knows who i am, let'm sue me.
Atleast i don't use backhanded stratagies to try & shut up ex-employees.

Cheers
Legal threats? : Comment 326 of 1057ANN.lu
Posted by Don Cox on 06-Apr-2004 17:27 GMT
In reply to Comment 296 (Rich Woods):
"The reason bill buck hasn't said anything is that they most likely are trying to find where the e-mail originated from."

There is no mystery about that. It is well known. Adam owned up almost at once.


"And bill buck, like him or not, he has weathered enough of the Genesi pro and con flamewars - it just wouldn't make any sense to make a "threat" like what is purported to have been made.

And since there was an issue of late payment of monies to Christian for past advertising - bill buck wouldn't be rubbing salt into Christians "wounds". It just makes no sense."

People often do things which don't make sense and don't do them any good. They get obsessed by something and drive deeper and deeper into the mud.
Legal threats? : Comment 327 of 1057ANN.lu
Posted by oxygenet32 on 06-Apr-2004 17:28 GMT
In reply to Comment 320 (Anonymous):
Nope, you'll probably find what's started making BB's cup overflow is the fact that he can't control the community like sheep anymore - period.

Chris
Legal threats? : Comment 328 of 1057ANN.lu
Posted by T1k on 06-Apr-2004 17:29 GMT
The problem with people in general is that they think they are right. Of course, they are not. (And therefore this statement is extremely silly.) :]
Legal threats? : Comment 329 of 1057ANN.lu
Posted by William F. Maddock on 06-Apr-2004 17:32 GMT
In reply to Comment 289 (XraalE):
Actually, no, I didn't state it as though it were certain, only that I suspected as much after having been followed home by a couple who fled when I stood there watching them and waiting for them to leave their vehicle.

I have found that making such things public very quickly has two effects, one minor, and one very major: The minor effect is that you tend to look like a fool. The very major effect is that the activity in question quickly stops—like when my website was attacked.

I had made a posting at Amiga.org under the heading "My Take". During the ensuing flame-fest I received emails from seven individuals, professing their support. I responded to all of them with the same email. Part of that email was to inform them of where they could find the article for further use. Immediately after sending that email out, the ISP hosting my website was attacked simultaneously from a dozen different high speed cable modem accounts (I might be a bit off in the specificity of the type of accounts, but the essentials are accurate) and many websites were taken offline. Once I found out exactly who was running the hardware that hosts my website, I went to their website, and there was the notice of the attack, with specifics including the timing of it.

I have been attacked personally—to the point that I have had to watch my back—and had my website attacked, all in an effort to remove one article from the Internet. The ISP involved knows the IP addresses of the people who attacked the site, and I will leave that to them, but the timing of all of it makes it astoundingly clear who is behind it all.
Legal threats? : Comment 330 of 1057ANN.lu
Posted by Amon_Re on 06-Apr-2004 17:32 GMT
In reply to Comment 320 (Anonymous):
You really don't get it, do you, this is a threat, not a legal action being taken, but a threat that one might come.
Now, put 2 & 2 together & think a minute... what has BBRV to gain from this? Here's a hint, read Greg S.'s posts in the beginning.
BBRV doesn't give a flying shit about what i say (and you should note that the only thing my comments would be good for would be slander on his character, nothing regarding to Genesi, i try & stay clear from that as much as possible) or any of the other more vocal people.

Cheers
Legal threats? : Comment 331 of 1057ANN.lu
Posted by Amon_Re on 06-Apr-2004 17:34 GMT
In reply to Comment 321 (Mr. Anonymous):
Most employment contracts have such clauses, including mine.
If i quit my job today, i can't get employed by any of my current customers, unless they pay me less then i currently make etc.

Cheers
Legal threats? : Comment 332 of 1057ANN.lu
Posted by Darrin on 06-Apr-2004 17:34 GMT
In reply to Comment 309 (Fabio Alemagna):
>Please, be more clear. Enumerate which statements you are referring to.

OK, here’s a few examples…

>Please dude, don't abuse of this issue to further your agenda, ok?

So anyone with a viewpoint different to yours has an “agenda” and are abusing ANN as a result?

>Look, it's because of people like you that this issue has been brought up in the first
place. Why don't you crawl back under your rock instead of spreading crap over this
site?

Exactly what BBRV appear to want – nobody should post anything against them… and you AGREE.

>It seems like Christian wanted some sort of revenge, after all, and purposedly and
carefully worded a news item to cause trouble. Can you really disagree with that? All evidence points to it.

So now Christian is on a man vendetta just like in the Death Wish movies? You really want us to AGREE with that?

>I find it pathetic, to say the least, that some people don't even have the decency to shut up until things are clearer, from ALL sides.

OK folks, no speculating from now on. No need to have a “post comments” feature on ANN as all we need to do is read the “news” and accept it. Our thoughts are no longer welcome!

>I rather think all red trolls should go back to their place and save their advices for someone else.

Translates to “Anyone that agrees with what Christian has done is an evil red troll with no brain! It’s all Amiga’s fault!”

>No, I apparently don't think like the majority here. For one, I don't endorse what BBRV allegedly wrote to Christian, but on the other hand I don't endorse the silliness that pervades this whole thread.

Agreeing with Christian is silly? You attack Christian’s methods of defending himself, but claim this isn’t endorsing BBRV?

>to Christian and demand that he makes names and his accusations clears and substantiated with facts.

Oh, we can’t post thoughts, but you DEMAND that Christian PUBLISHES the facts even though it might be illegal due to privacy notices?

>I beg to differ. Christian has purposedly (you can't say no, all evidence points to it) and carefully written a news item that makes no names and doesn't substantiate with facts the few words it contains, but only suggests something, even the name of the persons involved is just suggested.

Christian has deliberately started a flame-fest? Isn’t that slander??? He only “suggested” then names? How many previous employers of his can you think of that might want to censor his site and close him down? Hmmm…. Let’s see…. One… er… er… er…

>I didn't say people shouldn't comment on it.

ROTFL!!!!

>Moveover, Christian should have moderated all slandering posts, as he has always done.

If he did then some of yours would need to be removed.

>If those were his reasons, then he should have simply announced that the policies changed when they would have changed. No point in announcing that they, maybe, some time in the future, might change, or might not.

OK, so know he can’t report what’s actually happening? Is this a news site or a history site?

>Ok, then please explain it to me.

He had. Several times.

>We've heard one side of the story, and not even all of it. It's objectively not enough to make any judgements, no matter how trustable any of the parties involved is.

And the reason we haven’t heard the other side of the story is…..?

>So I'm safe in assuming that your only interest in this story is not knowing the truth, but slandering Genesi and BBRV.

Anyone supporting Chris is simply slandering Gensei?

>And slandering BBRV in what way helps ANN surviving? You mean, that you think that doig precisely the actions that Christian is allegedly considered responsible for, and for which he's allegedly been threatened for, helps him? You surely need help, if that's what you think.

So it’s Chris’ fault for trying to defend his website that’s at fault her? That’s like saying that it’s a shooting victim’s fault for staying in the path of the bullet. Nice one.

>You really sound silly, don't you? I've never asked him to publish the email verbatim, I've asked him to tell the whole story, and to make names, none of which is illegal.

If you get the “whole story” then don’t you need the email verbatim? If you didn’t then it wouldn’t be the WHOLE story.

Anyway, that’s enough of that. Here’s something you wrote that I liked:

>One thing is for sure, though: if there's anything we're not lacking of, in this community, are law suits. No one else beats us on that one, we should be proud of it!
Legal threats? : Comment 333 of 1057ANN.lu
Posted by Darrin on 06-Apr-2004 17:36 GMT
In reply to Comment 324 (Amon_Re):
>Darrin, don't get caught in silly games.

>Cheers

Damn, you right, but I already have!!!

I wish you posted that about 10 minutes earlier :-)
Legal threats? : Comment 334 of 1057ANN.lu
Posted by Fabio Alemagna on 06-Apr-2004 17:39 GMT
In reply to Comment 317 (Amon_Re):
> I think it might, and i agree with Bill H. on this.

Then I stand correct you you both need to have your heads examined.
Legal threats? : Comment 335 of 1057ANN.lu
Posted by Fabio Alemagna on 06-Apr-2004 17:40 GMT
In reply to Comment 318 (Amon_Re):
> Reread Bill H.'s previous posts.

And you read my reply.
Legal threats? : Comment 336 of 1057ANN.lu
Posted by Anonymous on 06-Apr-2004 17:40 GMT
In reply to Comment 330 (Amon_Re):
> You really don't get it, do you, this is a threat, not a legal action being taken, but a threat that one might come

No, you don't get it: I say it's a warning shot, you say it's a threat. One and the same thing.
Legal threats? : Comment 337 of 1057ANN.lu
Posted by Amon_Re on 06-Apr-2004 17:43 GMT
In reply to Comment 334 (Fabio Alemagna):
Fabio, that comment was totally uncalled for, nor justifyable.
Can you state here right now right here without any doubt that Christian is in a legal position to disclose this mail/fax/whatever without *ANY POSSIBLE* reprocusions upon him?
I can't, and i won't.
If anyone needs a dose of reality, it's you.
Don't bother replying tho, as i will not continue this discussion with you, it's nearly impossible to have a decent discussion with you.

Cheers
Legal threats? : Comment 338 of 1057ANN.lu
Posted by Eva on 06-Apr-2004 17:43 GMT
In reply to Comment 313 (Senex):
Indeed, but if comments pop up in this thread here (not by you) from trolls speaking about a "wantabe" OS and mainboard, the impression has to be avoided that those who criticized bbrv here would have also spoken against bplan's products as well. My concerns are directed against bbrv's behaviour only, while at the same time I enjoy the Pegasos and the great work the MorphOS team has accomplished
_____________________

Completely agree. And I have to add that also Mr Kemp and Decanini speack well about Pegasos and Morphos in the past and present.

Anyway really BB and RV are loosing all 2 cents of their credibility.
Legal threats? : Comment 339 of 1057ANN.lu
Posted by Fabio Alemagna on 06-Apr-2004 17:44 GMT
In reply to Comment 323 (Amon_Re):
> No Fabio, you give it up, Bill H.'s comment was right in the bulls-eye.

He's objectively wrong, as I've never said anything of which he, or you for that matter, attributes to me. Prove otherwise.

> You love wordgames.

No, I love honesty, something which lots of you in this thread lack of, including you, and unfortunately bill Hogget. And including Christian, sadly, who's watchign this saga - and perhaps enjoying it - without intervening the way he should.

What a riot this community has become, I'm ashamed of it.
Legal threats? : Comment 340 of 1057ANN.lu
Posted by Amon_Re on 06-Apr-2004 17:44 GMT
In reply to Comment 336 (Anonymous):
Then i misread your post, my apologies to you.

Cheers
Legal threats? : Comment 341 of 1057ANN.lu
Posted by Fabio Alemagna on 06-Apr-2004 17:44 GMT
In reply to Comment 325 (Amon_Re):
Thanks for confirming my point, Amon_Re.
Legal threats? : Comment 342 of 1057ANN.lu
Posted by Amon_Re on 06-Apr-2004 17:46 GMT
In reply to Comment 338 (Eva):
Eva, who knows, some good might come from this all, maybe we as a community will finally be able to bury the hatchett and stand united again.

Cheers
Legal threats? : Comment 343 of 1057ANN.lu
Posted by Fabio Alemagna on 06-Apr-2004 17:51 GMT
In reply to Comment 332 (Darrin):
Nice try, but I won't waste my time trying to fit in your head what will never be able to enter, due to lack of space. Misinterpreting my words, putting words in my mouth, and preteting to understand what I was thinking when I wrote what I wrote won't lead you anywhere.

No replies to you anymore, from me, it'd be just a waste of time.
Legal threats? : Comment 344 of 1057ANN.lu
Posted by Amon_Re on 06-Apr-2004 17:52 GMT
In reply to Comment 339 (Fabio Alemagna):
> No Fabio, you give it up, Bill H.'s comment was right in the bulls-eye.

He's objectively wrong, as I've never said anything of which he, or you for that matter, attributes to me. Prove otherwise.

Don't need to, you are already back to argueing about shemantics.

What Bill said makes perfect sence judging past exchanges with you, you take a discussion, find something vague or twistable, and start argueing about petite or silly details, without willingness to accept that other people might have a different opinion/idea.
And if someone dares question you you react with arrogant lines like "get your head examined".

> You love wordgames.

No, I love honesty, something which lots of you in this thread lack of, including you, and unfortunately bill Hogget. And including Christian, sadly, who's watchign this saga - and perhaps enjoying it - without intervening the way he should.

More snide remarks towards Christian, Christian isn't the bogeyman in this matter, he's the victim, first he was getting screwed with his social security, then with his salery & now over his website.
As for me lacking honesty, eighter you have a different understanding of the word, or you really should reread all my comments for the past 5 or so years.

What a riot this community has become, I'm ashamed of it.

I'm not, it's the first time in ages that the community has banded together about a single issue.

Cheers
Legal threats? : Comment 345 of 1057ANN.lu
Posted by Darrin on 06-Apr-2004 17:52 GMT
In reply to Comment 342 (Amon_Re):
>maybe we as a community will finally be able to bury the hatchett and stand united again.

and who's back were you planning to bury the hatchet in?

Sorry, couldn't resist it ;-)

Seriously though, I agree with what you say. We're seeing all sides of the community unite in support for Christian here... something that doesn't happen very often.
Legal threats? : Comment 346 of 1057ANN.lu
Posted by Amon_Re on 06-Apr-2004 17:53 GMT
In reply to Comment 341 (Fabio Alemagna):
Your welcome, atleast i owe up to what i say.

Cheers
Legal threats? : Comment 347 of 1057ANN.lu
Posted by Darrin on 06-Apr-2004 17:53 GMT
In reply to Comment 343 (Fabio Alemagna):
>No replies to you anymore, from me, it'd be just a waste of time.

Thank god for that.

Anyway, you asked for it. ;-)
Legal threats? : Comment 348 of 1057ANN.lu
Posted by Amon_Re on 06-Apr-2004 17:55 GMT
In reply to Comment 345 (Darrin):
>maybe we as a community will finally be able to bury the hatchett and stand united again.

and who's back were you planning to bury the hatchet in?

There's ample persons that qualify :)

Sorry, couldn't resist it ;-)

Don't worry, flamebait not taken ;)

Seriously though, I agree with what you say. We're seeing all sides of the community unite in support for Christian here... something that doesn't happen very often.

I can't remember when the last time was :(

Cheers
Legal threats? : Comment 349 of 1057ANN.lu
Posted by Fabio Alemagna on 06-Apr-2004 17:56 GMT
In reply to Comment 337 (Amon_Re):
> Fabio, that comment was totally uncalled for, nor justifyable.

Endorsing Hogget's statement by which I am acting on the basis of an alledged loyalty I have torwards bbrv due to the board they've offered the AROS team is even less justifiable.

> Can you state here right now right here without any doubt that Christian is in
> a legal position to disclose this mail/fax/whatever without *ANY POSSIBLE*
> reprocusions upon him?

No, in no legal way, in EU, he can disclose privare correspondence. But then, when did I say he has to disclose any correspondence? I said he has to make names - which is not illegal - and tell the whole story - which is not illegal.

> I can't, and i won't.

I can't and I won't either. As I've never done.

> If anyone needs a dose of reality, it's you.

Righto.

> Don't bother replying tho, as i will not continue this discussion with you,
> it's nearly impossible to have a decent discussion with you.

Oh, yeah, sure. Says the one who can't, evidently, even read what the interlocutor writes.
Legal threats? : Comment 350 of 1057ANN.lu
Posted by Fabio Alemagna on 06-Apr-2004 17:59 GMT
In reply to Comment 347 (Darrin):
> Anyway, you asked for it. ;-)

and you didn't give me what I asked for.
Anonymous, there are 1057 items in your selection (but only 757 shown due to limitation) [1 - 50] [51 - 100] [101 - 150] [151 - 200] [201 - 250] [251 - 300] [301 - 350] [351 - 400] [401 - 450] [451 - 500] [More...]
Back to Top