26-Apr-2024 09:31 GMT.
UNDER CONSTRUCTION
[News] New Executive UpdateANN.lu
Posted on 24-Jun-2002 04:22 GMT by Johan "Graak" Forsberg128 comments
View flat
View list
There's a new, VERY interesting Executive Update at Amiga Inc's website.
List of all comments to this article
Sorted by date, most recent at bottom
Comment 1Mekanix24-Jun-2002 02:40 GMT
Comment 2borkbork24-Jun-2002 03:03 GMT
Comment 3Anonymous24-Jun-2002 03:08 GMT
Comment 4Anonymous24-Jun-2002 03:24 GMT
Comment 5cheesegrate24-Jun-2002 03:51 GMT
Comment 6Björn Hagström24-Jun-2002 03:57 GMT
New Executive Update : Comment 7 of 128ANN.lu
Posted by Kent on 24-Jun-2002 04:01 GMT
For Amiga Inc's sake I hope that nobody outside of "The Community" will read these ridiculous updates.
"You have all been patient, more than understanding, and have dealt with more misinformation, disinformation and rumors than any one group of people should, ever."
Yeah, we know, we all read your website and the garbage and conjecture you and your "partners" are spreading. How about either shutting up or telling the truth sometimes?
"One request: If you find this information as positive as we do, share it with someone."
Do your own damn marketing, unless you pay me of course.
"REAL opportunities will soon be here for all of us in the Amiga Community."
You are not part of us, the "community". We are your customers.
"we decide on a number of units to build and then we see, from web hits and direct inquiries, that there are 5 times as many people who are interested in the AmigaOne than we knew were out there. You can file that under "Beyond Our Expectations"."
No, that is filed under "so many unique HTTP requests were made from people who wanted to see screenshots of some OS4 components running under 68k". It has fuck all to do with a POP motherboard. Also, it's up to Eyetech to decide how many of those mobos they'll order.
"We are really pleased that the hardware is out there, and that the Amiga community is going to have the first new hardware designed for them, with their own operating system, in a long, long time."
Stop with the obvious lies at least, please. The people who designed those POP mobos have probably never heard of AmigaOS.
*I* don't want any hardware designed for me. *You* don't make any hardware designed for me. So far, so good! Now sell me your OS.
"the features and benefits that you have told us that you, The Community, want in a new Amiga."
Oh shut up. If Intel, Motorola, Sony or nVidia bought the Amiga trademark, then maybe "a new Amiga" would be a feasible idea. That hasn't happened, and we all know there will be no new Amigas. We don't want any, unless there's a BIG enough company backing up development and sales. Stop fucking pretending.
"the Amiga Anywhere Content Engine."
Yeah, introduce another meaningless designation with the "content" buzzword. That'll help your explanation. Why not just say "we renamed the 'AmigaDE-Player'"?
"However it allowed us to show to our board and our investors that we should pursue building a new Amiga computer."
WILL YOU F*CKING STOP IT ALREADY!?
"We need to properly plan, budget, and order for the production of the AmigaOne."
No, you don't. Hardware is the job of your licencees, remember? Or are you suggesting that the currently sole licensee will - *gasp* - always be the sole licensee? What a surprise! Not.
The numbers of current and potential Amiga users are nothing but bizarre. 30000 subscribers of "Amiga related" magazines? Is MacWorld "Amiga related" because they mention 68k and PPC CPUs?
"OK one more - hit 50,000 orders Amiga will give away 100 systems, 100 Amiga Enabled Cell Phones 3 trips for 2 to either Hawaii or Florida."
"The Cell phones, and the Amiga systems will be shipped as soon as they are available."
ROTFL. Seriously. This is the funniest thing I've read in a LONG while. It's like something on SA.
The expression "The Community" is being used as if we're the property of AI. From the Amithlon update: "we have had to deal with companies who would like nothing better than to split the Amiga community". Yeah well, tough luck Bill, but Gateway didn't sell us, our different needs and different wishes to you. The individuals of "The Community"(TM) have nothing more in common than that we're using AmigaOS. Don't make any assumptions and generalizations beyond that.
Jump...
#14 Syke
TopPrevious commentNext commentbottom
List of all comments to this article (continued)
Comment 8Björn Hagström24-Jun-2002 04:02 GMT
Comment 9cheesegrat24-Jun-2002 04:03 GMT
Comment 10Anonymous24-Jun-2002 04:04 GMT
Comment 11Björn Hagström24-Jun-2002 04:06 GMT
Comment 12Don Cox24-Jun-2002 04:06 GMT
Comment 13cheesegrate24-Jun-2002 04:07 GMT
Comment 14Syke24-Jun-2002 04:41 GMT
Comment 15James Carroll24-Jun-2002 04:42 GMT
Comment 16Björn Hagström24-Jun-2002 04:47 GMT
Comment 17Syke24-Jun-2002 04:55 GMT
Comment 18cOrpse24-Jun-2002 05:23 GMT
Comment 19priest24-Jun-2002 05:37 GMT
Comment 20NeRP24-Jun-2002 06:12 GMT
Comment 21Anders Kjeldsen24-Jun-2002 06:46 GMT
Comment 22cheese24-Jun-2002 06:56 GMT
Comment 23Anonymous24-Jun-2002 07:17 GMT
Comment 24anarchic_teapot24-Jun-2002 07:25 GMT
Comment 25Björn Hagström24-Jun-2002 07:37 GMT
Comment 26cheesegrate24-Jun-2002 07:43 GMT
Comment 27Björn Hagström24-Jun-2002 07:48 GMT
Comment 28Mika Hanhijärvi24-Jun-2002 08:01 GMT
Comment 29redrumloa24-Jun-2002 09:45 GMT
Comment 30David Scheibler24-Jun-2002 11:02 GMT
Comment 31Bill Hoggett24-Jun-2002 11:21 GMT
Comment 32Graham24-Jun-2002 11:22 GMT
Comment 33Leif24-Jun-2002 11:27 GMT
Comment 34Graham24-Jun-2002 11:52 GMT
Comment 35Leif24-Jun-2002 11:56 GMT
Comment 36Adam Kowalczyk24-Jun-2002 12:10 GMT
Comment 37redrumloa24-Jun-2002 12:17 GMT
Comment 38Darrin24-Jun-2002 12:19 GMT
Comment 39MIKE24-Jun-2002 12:26 GMT
Comment 40Syke24-Jun-2002 12:27 GMT
Comment 41Derf24-Jun-2002 12:27 GMT
Comment 42Derf24-Jun-2002 12:28 GMT
Comment 43Mikey C24-Jun-2002 12:30 GMT
Comment 44Darrin24-Jun-2002 12:32 GMT
Comment 45Anonymous24-Jun-2002 12:35 GMT
Comment 46Derf24-Jun-2002 12:38 GMT
Comment 47Bill Hoggett24-Jun-2002 12:38 GMT
Comment 48Derf24-Jun-2002 12:41 GMT
Comment 49Adam Kowalczyk@cogeco.ca24-Jun-2002 12:41 GMT
Comment 50DaveW24-Jun-2002 12:47 GMT
Comment 51amigammc24-Jun-2002 13:07 GMT
Comment 52cheeseg24-Jun-2002 13:10 GMT
Comment 53redrumloa24-Jun-2002 13:14 GMT
Comment 54redrumloa24-Jun-2002 13:18 GMT
Comment 55cheeegrate24-Jun-2002 13:18 GMT
Comment 56redrumloa24-Jun-2002 13:19 GMT
Comment 57Don Cox24-Jun-2002 13:19 GMT
Comment 58ehaines24-Jun-2002 13:20 GMT
Comment 59Derf24-Jun-2002 13:23 GMT
Comment 60Mike Veroukis24-Jun-2002 13:30 GMT
Comment 61cheesegrate24-Jun-2002 13:36 GMT
Comment 62cOrpse24-Jun-2002 14:19 GMT
Comment 63Leif24-Jun-2002 14:23 GMT
Comment 64cheesegrate24-Jun-2002 14:36 GMT
Comment 65cheese24-Jun-2002 14:42 GMT
Comment 66Anonymous24-Jun-2002 14:49 GMT
Comment 67priest24-Jun-2002 14:50 GMT
Comment 68Anonymous24-Jun-2002 15:11 GMT
Comment 69Anonymous24-Jun-2002 15:32 GMT
Comment 70Derf24-Jun-2002 15:45 GMT
Comment 71Adam Kowalczyk24-Jun-2002 15:52 GMT
Comment 72Don Cox24-Jun-2002 16:15 GMT
Comment 73Adam Kowalczyk24-Jun-2002 16:21 GMT
Comment 74Sam24-Jun-2002 16:31 GMT
Comment 75Sam24-Jun-2002 16:37 GMT
Comment 76Adam Kowalczyk24-Jun-2002 16:50 GMT
Comment 77amigammc24-Jun-2002 18:18 GMT
Comment 78Darrin24-Jun-2002 18:23 GMT
Comment 79amigammc24-Jun-2002 18:28 GMT
Comment 80amigammc24-Jun-2002 18:29 GMT
Comment 81amigammc24-Jun-2002 18:31 GMT
Comment 82amigammc24-Jun-2002 18:32 GMT
Comment 83amigammc24-Jun-2002 18:47 GMT
Comment 84Bill Hoggett24-Jun-2002 18:48 GMT
Comment 85amigammc24-Jun-2002 18:51 GMT
Comment 86amigammc24-Jun-2002 18:56 GMT
Comment 87amigammc24-Jun-2002 18:59 GMT
Comment 88Mike Veroukis24-Jun-2002 19:00 GMT
Comment 89amigammc24-Jun-2002 19:04 GMT
Comment 90Darrin24-Jun-2002 19:06 GMT
Comment 91redrumloa24-Jun-2002 19:08 GMT
Comment 92Chris Young24-Jun-2002 19:11 GMT
Comment 93Mike Veroukis24-Jun-2002 19:19 GMT
Comment 94Darrin24-Jun-2002 19:28 GMT
Comment 95Bill Hoggett24-Jun-2002 19:39 GMT
Comment 96Darrin24-Jun-2002 19:47 GMT
Comment 97Anonymous24-Jun-2002 20:05 GMT
Comment 98cheeser24-Jun-2002 21:07 GMT
Comment 99Anonymous24-Jun-2002 21:09 GMT
Comment 100Anonymous24-Jun-2002 21:10 GMT
Comment 101redrumloa24-Jun-2002 21:23 GMT
Comment 102rerumloa24-Jun-2002 21:27 GMT
Comment 103tinman24-Jun-2002 21:29 GMT
Comment 104the man in the shadows24-Jun-2002 21:37 GMT
Comment 105MasterOfReality24-Jun-2002 21:43 GMT
Comment 106Stuart Anderson24-Jun-2002 22:13 GMT
Comment 107Joe "Floid" Kanowitz24-Jun-2002 22:26 GMT
Comment 108gary_c24-Jun-2002 23:34 GMT
Comment 109gary_c24-Jun-2002 23:44 GMT
Comment 110amigo25-Jun-2002 01:50 GMT
Comment 111cheesegrate25-Jun-2002 01:59 GMT
Comment 112cheesegrate25-Jun-2002 03:18 GMT
Comment 113cheesegrate25-Jun-2002 03:23 GMT
Comment 114Björn Hagström25-Jun-2002 03:51 GMT
Comment 115Christian Kemp25-Jun-2002 06:08 GMT
Comment 116Mic25-Jun-2002 06:48 GMT
Comment 117Ketzer25-Jun-2002 06:51 GMT
Comment 118cheesegrate25-Jun-2002 07:33 GMT
Comment 119Christian Kemp25-Jun-2002 08:45 GMT
Comment 120redrumaol25-Jun-2002 09:11 GMT
Comment 121amigammc25-Jun-2002 11:10 GMT
Comment 122amigammc25-Jun-2002 11:11 GMT
Comment 123amigammc25-Jun-2002 11:12 GMT
Comment 124acg25-Jun-2002 11:57 GMT
Comment 125acg25-Jun-2002 12:24 GMT
Comment 126redrumloa25-Jun-2002 13:00 GMT
Comment 127cheesegrate25-Jun-2002 14:39 GMT
Comment 128Anonymous25-Jun-2002 15:20 GMT
Back to Top