27-Apr-2024 05:16 GMT.
UNDER CONSTRUCTION
[Web] Interview with Bill M on ExtremetechANN.lu
Posted on 12-Nov-2002 09:12 GMT by dakang (Edited on 2002-11-12 16:57:42 GMT by Teemu I. Yliselä)98 comments
View flat
View list
As the title says... http://www.extremetech.com
Straight link to the interview
List of all comments to this article
Sorted by date, most recent at bottom
Comment 1koan12-Nov-2002 08:24 GMT
Comment 2dakang12-Nov-2002 08:27 GMT
Comment 3SlimJim12-Nov-2002 08:30 GMT
Comment 4JoannaK12-Nov-2002 08:44 GMT
Comment 5DaveW12-Nov-2002 08:45 GMT
Comment 6Radfoo12-Nov-2002 09:12 GMT
Comment 7Anonymous12-Nov-2002 09:13 GMT
Comment 8JoannaK12-Nov-2002 09:27 GMT
Comment 9gz12-Nov-2002 09:30 GMT
Comment 10Bladerunner12-Nov-2002 09:31 GMT
Comment 11gz12-Nov-2002 09:50 GMT
Comment 12Anonymous12-Nov-2002 10:15 GMT
Comment 13CyberZorro12-Nov-2002 10:30 GMT
Comment 14JoannaK12-Nov-2002 10:34 GMT
Comment 15Radfoo12-Nov-2002 10:51 GMT
Comment 16Budda12-Nov-2002 10:58 GMT
Comment 17Anonymous12-Nov-2002 11:14 GMT
Comment 18reflect12-Nov-2002 11:20 GMT
Comment 19koan12-Nov-2002 11:40 GMT
Comment 20DaveW12-Nov-2002 11:45 GMT
Comment 21Budda12-Nov-2002 11:48 GMT
Comment 22koan12-Nov-2002 11:57 GMT
Comment 23Ben12-Nov-2002 12:01 GMT
Comment 24Troels E12-Nov-2002 12:04 GMT
Comment 25nOw212-Nov-2002 12:05 GMT
Comment 26LieByLie12-Nov-2002 12:37 GMT
Comment 27gz12-Nov-2002 13:01 GMT
Comment 28.12-Nov-2002 13:02 GMT
Comment 29Alkis Tsapanidis12-Nov-2002 13:08 GMT
Comment 30Bill Hoggett12-Nov-2002 13:14 GMT
Comment 31redrumloa12-Nov-2002 13:30 GMT
Comment 32Menthos12-Nov-2002 13:30 GMT
Comment 33Alkis Tsapanidis12-Nov-2002 13:34 GMT
Comment 34JoannaK12-Nov-2002 13:37 GMT
Comment 35Tony12-Nov-2002 13:38 GMT
Comment 36Menthos12-Nov-2002 13:50 GMT
Comment 37Alkis Tsapanidis12-Nov-2002 13:51 GMT
Comment 38redrumloa12-Nov-2002 13:56 GMT
Comment 39Bill Hoggett12-Nov-2002 14:03 GMT
Comment 40Tony12-Nov-2002 14:04 GMT
Comment 41reflect12-Nov-2002 14:22 GMT
Comment 42priest12-Nov-2002 14:57 GMT
Comment 433seas12-Nov-2002 15:06 GMT
Comment 44Si12-Nov-2002 15:07 GMT
Comment 45catohagen12-Nov-2002 15:27 GMT
Comment 46Phill12-Nov-2002 15:28 GMT
Comment 47o1i12-Nov-2002 15:30 GMT
Comment 48Turrican12-Nov-2002 15:57 GMT
Comment 49turtle on quaaludes12-Nov-2002 16:20 GMT
Comment 50pixie12-Nov-2002 16:24 GMT
Comment 51pixie12-Nov-2002 16:25 GMT
Interview with Bill M on Extremetech : Comment 52 of 98ANN.lu
Posted by Szutoman on 12-Nov-2002 16:36 GMT
I am curious about this Interview... On one hand its great that the new Amiga hardware and OS are getting attention in the Tech Market Web Sites, but on the other hand, even I KNOW that this interview seems like a big stretch of miss-information. Perhaps its just marketing hype for the X86 crowd that has know Idea what the Amiga is; we all know many new generations of computer users have been born since we, the Original Amiga Users, bought our first Amigas 15 years ago. Man, has it been that long?
Another point is, WE, The Amiga users, are so well informed, that this type of stuff just ignites wars in the Amiga community and creates flame wars and uncertainty in our circle of knowledgably people, however, this information will not necessarily hurt those who are for the first time hearing about the Amiga. I think we all should take this interview, if that’s what you call it, with a grain of salt and rely on the channels of information we know are truth worthy, Hyperion, Eyetech… ect……..
I would like all of use to start a campaign to ask Newtek to Release Light wave 4.0 to the Amiga community, as I believe this is the last version for the Amiga to ever be released. Charge $99.99 for it and use those revenues to hire people to start coding the obsolete later version to the Amiga Community like 5.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5. Until we catch up, provide an upgrade path that is yearly releases and make money off of versions that are considered obsolete in the x86 communities. At least we could have a really good render Program for the Amiga out of the gates even if it is old(-:
Jump...
#58 Don Cox
TopPrevious commentNext commentbottom
List of all comments to this article (continued)
Comment 53@anonymous12-Nov-2002 16:58 GMT
Comment 54JoannaK12-Nov-2002 16:58 GMT
Comment 55pixie12-Nov-2002 17:08 GMT
Comment 56anonymous12-Nov-2002 17:10 GMT
Comment 57Don Cox12-Nov-2002 17:28 GMT
Comment 58Don Cox12-Nov-2002 17:33 GMT
Comment 59AmigaSource12-Nov-2002 17:55 GMT
Comment 60yoodoo12-Nov-2002 17:56 GMT
Comment 61Snaz_8912-Nov-2002 17:59 GMT
Comment 62Frodon12-Nov-2002 18:26 GMT
Comment 63AmigaSource12-Nov-2002 18:52 GMT
Comment 64szutoman12-Nov-2002 18:56 GMT
Comment 65KenH12-Nov-2002 19:00 GMT
Comment 66PaulT12-Nov-2002 19:30 GMT
Comment 67DaveW12-Nov-2002 19:39 GMT
Comment 68gz12-Nov-2002 20:03 GMT
Comment 69DaveW12-Nov-2002 20:05 GMT
Comment 70ExiE12-Nov-2002 20:10 GMT
Comment 71Anonymous12-Nov-2002 20:14 GMT
Comment 72gz12-Nov-2002 20:35 GMT
Comment 73Leif12-Nov-2002 21:01 GMT
Comment 74JoannaK12-Nov-2002 21:10 GMT
Comment 75gz12-Nov-2002 21:17 GMT
Comment 76KenH12-Nov-2002 21:27 GMT
Comment 77KenH12-Nov-2002 21:31 GMT
Comment 78strobe12-Nov-2002 21:46 GMT
Comment 79Leif12-Nov-2002 22:05 GMT
Comment 80DaveW12-Nov-2002 22:06 GMT
Comment 81strobe12-Nov-2002 22:15 GMT
Comment 82gz12-Nov-2002 22:15 GMT
Comment 83strobe12-Nov-2002 22:26 GMT
Comment 84strobe12-Nov-2002 22:28 GMT
Comment 85smp26612-Nov-2002 22:45 GMT
Comment 86Frans12-Nov-2002 22:53 GMT
Comment 87Rob12-Nov-2002 23:11 GMT
Comment 88amorel12-Nov-2002 23:47 GMT
Comment 89DaveW13-Nov-2002 08:04 GMT
Comment 90Bill Hoggett13-Nov-2002 11:53 GMT
Comment 91Rob13-Nov-2002 17:30 GMT
Comment 92Rob13-Nov-2002 17:38 GMT
Comment 93Rob13-Nov-2002 17:52 GMT
Comment 94KenH13-Nov-2002 18:02 GMT
Comment 95Keith Blakemore-Noble13-Nov-2002 21:50 GMT
Comment 96gz13-Nov-2002 21:53 GMT
Comment 97strobe14-Nov-2002 04:50 GMT
Comment 98Anonymous14-Nov-2002 16:59 GMT
Back to Top