26-Apr-2024 07:46 GMT.
UNDER CONSTRUCTION
[News] Thendic-FranceANN.lu
Posted on 17-Nov-2003 19:18 GMT by bbrv161 comments
View flat
View list
At today's hearing of the Tribunal of Commerce in Paris a judgment was rendered declaring Pretory, S.A. in bankruptcy and appointing a receiver. The process finally will now begin to transfer Thendic-France's assets to Genesi SARL. Our situation with Pretory S.A. has been a long and difficult one. In all matters we have cooperated with the French Government and agreed to close the Company in a coordinated and proper manner. Time will demonstrate that we have behaved properly and legally in all respects as shareholders and managers. In no way will these matters effect Genesi. Finally, we are personally free to devote the time and resources we want to the Genesi. Sincerely, Raquel and Bill
List of all comments to this article
Sorted by date, most recent at bottom
Comment 1SenexRegistered user17-Nov-2003 18:44 GMT
Comment 2Anonymous17-Nov-2003 18:51 GMT
Comment 3Ron van HerkRegistered user17-Nov-2003 18:52 GMT
Comment 4Gunne Steen17-Nov-2003 18:57 GMT
Comment 5Anonymous17-Nov-2003 18:59 GMT
Comment 6bbrvRegistered user17-Nov-2003 19:00 GMT
Comment 7Anonymous17-Nov-2003 19:07 GMT
Comment 8DaveP17-Nov-2003 19:08 GMT
Comment 9bbrvRegistered user17-Nov-2003 19:16 GMT
Comment 10samface17-Nov-2003 19:22 GMT
Comment 11Anonymous17-Nov-2003 19:23 GMT
Comment 12Nate DownesRegistered user17-Nov-2003 19:25 GMT
Comment 13Anonymous17-Nov-2003 19:26 GMT
Comment 14Crumb // AATRegistered user17-Nov-2003 19:32 GMT
Comment 15samface17-Nov-2003 19:36 GMT
Comment 16bbrvRegistered user17-Nov-2003 19:47 GMT
Comment 17Anonymous17-Nov-2003 19:47 GMT
Comment 18Darth_X17-Nov-2003 19:53 GMT
Comment 19Anonymous17-Nov-2003 20:17 GMT
Comment 20Christophe DecaniniRegistered user17-Nov-2003 20:21 GMT
Comment 21bbrvRegistered user17-Nov-2003 20:24 GMT
Comment 22Nate DownesRegistered user17-Nov-2003 20:34 GMT
Comment 23Nate DownesRegistered user17-Nov-2003 20:39 GMT
Comment 24bbrvRegistered user17-Nov-2003 20:40 GMT
Comment 25Tipu17-Nov-2003 20:40 GMT
Comment 26stumpy17-Nov-2003 20:52 GMT
Comment 27Anonymous17-Nov-2003 21:32 GMT
Comment 28Nate DownesRegistered user17-Nov-2003 21:41 GMT
Comment 29Christoph Gutjahr17-Nov-2003 22:01 GMT
Comment 30bbrvRegistered user17-Nov-2003 22:38 GMT
Comment 31NekoRegistered user17-Nov-2003 22:40 GMT
Comment 32Anonymous17-Nov-2003 22:41 GMT
Comment 33Mithalas17-Nov-2003 22:55 GMT
Comment 34bbrvRegistered user17-Nov-2003 22:59 GMT
Comment 35Van M.17-Nov-2003 23:58 GMT
Comment 36Oppressor18-Nov-2003 00:09 GMT
Comment 37T_Bone18-Nov-2003 00:47 GMT
Comment 38Anonymous18-Nov-2003 01:00 GMT
Comment 39greenboyRegistered user18-Nov-2003 01:01 GMT
Comment 40T_Bone18-Nov-2003 02:34 GMT
Comment 41T_Bone18-Nov-2003 03:06 GMT
Comment 42Nate DownesRegistered user18-Nov-2003 03:26 GMT
Comment 43John18-Nov-2003 03:32 GMT
Comment 44TarghanRegistered user18-Nov-2003 04:01 GMT
Comment 45DaveP18-Nov-2003 06:23 GMT
Comment 46Anonymous18-Nov-2003 06:56 GMT
Comment 47gary_c18-Nov-2003 06:58 GMT
Comment 48greenboyRegistered user18-Nov-2003 07:03 GMT
Comment 49Anonymous18-Nov-2003 07:06 GMT
Comment 50Anonymous18-Nov-2003 07:12 GMT
Comment 51Anonymous18-Nov-2003 07:13 GMT
Comment 52DaveP18-Nov-2003 07:21 GMT
Comment 53SJ18-Nov-2003 07:24 GMT
Comment 54DaveP18-Nov-2003 07:26 GMT
Comment 55Ben Yoris18-Nov-2003 07:52 GMT
Comment 56SenexRegistered user18-Nov-2003 08:58 GMT
Comment 57samface18-Nov-2003 09:06 GMT
Comment 58Oppressor18-Nov-2003 09:27 GMT
Comment 59Anonymous18-Nov-2003 09:59 GMT
Comment 60Anonymous18-Nov-2003 10:01 GMT
Comment 61Alkis TsapanidisRegistered user18-Nov-2003 10:28 GMT
Comment 62Alkis TsapanidisRegistered user18-Nov-2003 10:32 GMT
Comment 63Bill Hoggett18-Nov-2003 10:35 GMT
Comment 64NekoRegistered user18-Nov-2003 10:36 GMT
Comment 65John18-Nov-2003 10:47 GMT
Comment 66Amon_ReRegistered user18-Nov-2003 10:48 GMT
Comment 67Amon_ReRegistered user18-Nov-2003 10:51 GMT
Comment 68Amon_ReRegistered user18-Nov-2003 10:54 GMT
Comment 69DaveP18-Nov-2003 10:55 GMT
Comment 70JoannaK18-Nov-2003 10:55 GMT
Comment 71Amon_ReRegistered user18-Nov-2003 10:55 GMT
Comment 72Amon_ReRegistered user18-Nov-2003 10:58 GMT
Comment 73Abuse18-Nov-2003 10:59 GMT
Comment 74DaveP18-Nov-2003 11:06 GMT
Comment 75AdmV18-Nov-2003 11:17 GMT
Comment 76Amon_ReRegistered user18-Nov-2003 11:19 GMT
Comment 77Bill Hoggett18-Nov-2003 11:43 GMT
Comment 78Alfie Moon18-Nov-2003 12:03 GMT
Comment 79Oppressor18-Nov-2003 12:07 GMT
Comment 80Christian KempRegistered user18-Nov-2003 12:19 GMT
Comment 81stumpy18-Nov-2003 12:27 GMT
Comment 82SenexRegistered user18-Nov-2003 12:58 GMT
Comment 83bbrvRegistered user18-Nov-2003 12:59 GMT
Comment 84Oppressor18-Nov-2003 13:52 GMT
Comment 85EmpathyLesson18-Nov-2003 13:57 GMT
Comment 86Matt Parsons18-Nov-2003 14:13 GMT
Comment 87samface18-Nov-2003 14:35 GMT
Comment 88Tigger18-Nov-2003 15:39 GMT
Comment 89Darrin18-Nov-2003 17:13 GMT
Comment 90T_Bone18-Nov-2003 18:28 GMT
Comment 91Amon_ReRegistered user18-Nov-2003 20:40 GMT
Comment 92Matt Parsons18-Nov-2003 20:55 GMT
Comment 93Anonymous18-Nov-2003 21:26 GMT
Comment 94T_Bone18-Nov-2003 22:12 GMT
Comment 95greenboyRegistered user18-Nov-2003 22:53 GMT
Comment 96greenboyRegistered user18-Nov-2003 23:33 GMT
Comment 97gary_c18-Nov-2003 23:54 GMT
Comment 98cheesegrate19-Nov-2003 02:11 GMT
Comment 99Anonymous19-Nov-2003 02:59 GMT
Comment 100Ronald19-Nov-2003 04:39 GMT
Comment 101DaveP19-Nov-2003 08:43 GMT
Comment 102DaveP19-Nov-2003 09:33 GMT
Comment 103Amon_ReRegistered user19-Nov-2003 10:34 GMT
Comment 104Anonymous19-Nov-2003 10:42 GMT
Comment 105JoannaK19-Nov-2003 11:15 GMT
Comment 106bbrvRegistered user19-Nov-2003 11:20 GMT
Comment 107DaveP19-Nov-2003 11:21 GMT
Comment 108redrumloa19-Nov-2003 11:25 GMT
Comment 109Oppressor19-Nov-2003 11:31 GMT
Comment 110Paul H19-Nov-2003 11:42 GMT
Comment 111Anonymous19-Nov-2003 11:44 GMT
Comment 112bbrvRegistered user19-Nov-2003 11:55 GMT
Comment 113Oppressor19-Nov-2003 12:06 GMT
Comment 114Christophe DecaniniRegistered user19-Nov-2003 12:22 GMT
Comment 115bbrvRegistered user19-Nov-2003 12:22 GMT
Comment 116bbrvRegistered user19-Nov-2003 12:35 GMT
Comment 117Damien Naviliat19-Nov-2003 12:56 GMT
Comment 118Damien Naviliat19-Nov-2003 13:01 GMT
Comment 119Nowee19-Nov-2003 13:05 GMT
Comment 120Damien Naviliat19-Nov-2003 13:07 GMT
Comment 121Christian KempRegistered user19-Nov-2003 13:22 GMT
Comment 122Damien Naviliat19-Nov-2003 13:33 GMT
Comment 123Lennart Fridén19-Nov-2003 14:22 GMT
Thendic-France : Comment 124 of 161ANN.lu
Posted by bbrv on 19-Nov-2003 14:58 GMT
Hi Damien, you did send your email to our personal email address just like everyone else can. Even though you have decided to not allow others to communicate directly with you, you have at least decided to put a name to your post. Thank you. It is nice to know now that you are the same person who did this in March. Remember that discussion? :-)

We are not really sure why you feel compelled to do this or why we feel compelled to answer. Perhaps, it is because in France as we told a Liberation journalist this morning:

Dear XXXXXXXXXX, <snip> The problem is that EVEN our French friends do not trust the French media and feel that you would distort the information for your purposes. The issues here are much bigger than Pretory. You know that. As such this matter cannot be settled in the Press. This has and will become a "political" matter. Unfortunately, to continue to keep the business running was to fight against a system that would not allow us to survive once we made the changes to run the Company properly and in a legally correct manner.

I will say this -- there were many outstanding employees in Pretory. They worked hard and they performed their duties well. They do not deserve what has happened to them. A few have taken from all. I believe in the French Republic and I believe through the legal process that the full details of this matter will be ultimately exposed and a proper accounting and judgment will be rendered.

How I wish I could tell you more! You are a persistent guy.

Sincerely,

Bill

===========

We hope Damien that reading this email will somehow make you feel vindicated. How is that for disclosure!? You cannot say we are not "open." :-)

On to your other comments...

1. About Garry Hare -- you are seriously misinformed. Everything we ever said about Garry Hare was 100% correct. Read the trail of announcements/discussion from the other "side" if you doubt that. Further, there are absolutely no lawsuits that involve Garry Hare. Garry Hare is a professional, a nice person and a smart guy. Further, there are no other lawsuits that involve us and Amiga Inc. other than the one that *may* or may not be settled this week. If fact, this is the only lawsuit that we are involved in today outside of France (in the WHOLE world!). The ones we have filed in France concern the affairs of Pretory. Somebody is feeding you line...

2. Intent does exist. It is a very interesting product and Tao is a capable and interesting Company. We hope to be having a nice chat with Francis Charig soon. What Amiga DE is on top of Intent? We do not know. It seems you have first hand experience. Great! The Pegasos may be the first commercial platform that bundles Amiga DE. Would you like to continue to develop for it? We are making a handheld of the Pegasos. If you think about the Pegasos as a development machine and the multiple operating systems running on it there may actually be a future for the effort expended to date. We hope so.

3. You posted the same link months ago. You never came by to visit us and only now you have posted your name. You sound like a decent guy at heart, but you have listened and believed too many rumors about us. Judge us by what we have done and by what we do. In a matter such as Pretory only the legal system of the French Government has a chance to understand and expose the truth about all this. Why not give you heart a rest and use your head? There is no smoking gun here.

Actually, Le Canard Echaine is pretty funny sometimes, forgetting it's social far left leaning tendencies. There were a couple of other articles too, including one in the Parisian, but it was brief and the focus was Air France.

Finally, in response to your second email we just received, please read Comment #88 and others above. Amiga Inc. did to itself what could not be done by another.

Sincerely, and we hope in conclusion for now,
R&B

:-)
Jump...
#125 Matt Parsons #130 Damien Naviliat
TopPrevious commentNext commentbottom
List of all comments to this article (continued)
Comment 125Matt Parsons19-Nov-2003 15:18 GMT
Comment 126DaveP19-Nov-2003 15:20 GMT
Comment 127Matt Parsons19-Nov-2003 15:24 GMT
Comment 128bbrvRegistered user19-Nov-2003 15:25 GMT
Comment 129Matt Parsons19-Nov-2003 15:35 GMT
Comment 130Damien Naviliat19-Nov-2003 15:43 GMT
Comment 131greenboyRegistered user19-Nov-2003 15:55 GMT
Comment 132bbrvRegistered user19-Nov-2003 15:55 GMT
Comment 133Christophe DecaniniRegistered user19-Nov-2003 16:09 GMT
Comment 134bbrvRegistered user19-Nov-2003 16:26 GMT
Comment 135DaveP19-Nov-2003 16:36 GMT
Comment 136Christophe DecaniniRegistered user19-Nov-2003 16:38 GMT
Comment 137Abuse19-Nov-2003 16:56 GMT
Comment 138Ann19-Nov-2003 21:17 GMT
Comment 139Ann19-Nov-2003 21:28 GMT
Comment 140Amon_ReRegistered user19-Nov-2003 21:33 GMT
Comment 141Ann19-Nov-2003 21:38 GMT
Comment 142Amon_ReRegistered user19-Nov-2003 22:10 GMT
Comment 143Amon_ReRegistered user19-Nov-2003 22:14 GMT
Comment 144greenboyRegistered user19-Nov-2003 22:39 GMT
Comment 145Nicolas Sallin20-Nov-2003 00:39 GMT
Comment 146Anonymous20-Nov-2003 03:59 GMT
Comment 147CleanRoomMyAzz20-Nov-2003 04:03 GMT
Comment 148Nicolas Sallin20-Nov-2003 05:46 GMT
Comment 149DaveP20-Nov-2003 05:56 GMT
Comment 150Anonymous20-Nov-2003 06:03 GMT
Comment 151gary_c20-Nov-2003 06:15 GMT
Comment 152gary_c20-Nov-2003 06:21 GMT
Comment 153Anonymous20-Nov-2003 06:31 GMT
Comment 154Nicolas Sallin20-Nov-2003 07:16 GMT
Comment 155Anonymous20-Nov-2003 07:27 GMT
Comment 156DaveP20-Nov-2003 07:34 GMT
Comment 157BuriedHeads20-Nov-2003 14:40 GMT
Comment 158Stephane Desrosiers20-Nov-2003 14:42 GMT
Comment 159PunditsRock20-Nov-2003 14:43 GMT
Comment 160damien naviliat20-Nov-2003 15:07 GMT
Comment 161Matt Parsons20-Nov-2003 15:10 GMT
Back to Top