[Forum] Interesting thread on Amiga.org | ANN.lu |
Posted on 06-Sep-2004 14:12 GMT by Anonymous (Edited on 2004-09-06 19:48:28 GMT by Christian Kemp) | 382 comments View flat View list |
Due to censorship by Argo the thread is locked but it is interesting to see a major Anti Amiga Inc webmaster turn in to a Genesi attacker and a certain website defender.
Amiga.org thread
Discuss
|
|
List of all comments to this article |
Interesting thread on Amiga.org : Comment 324 of 382 | ANN.lu |
Posted by Fabio Alemagna on 09-Sep-2004 09:00 GMT | In reply to Comment 316 (Sammy Nordström): Sammy sammy, how can you be so frakin' ridiculous is beyond me. I've explicitely asked to not cut a part of my posting away, yet you shamelessy did it.
Don't you see you're coming off as stupid?
Answer to this:
Oh, well, can you blame BB for not having foreseen the name of the new company that was going to being formed to hide AInc's debts?
On the other hand, it turned out to be true - or so does Bill McEwen say - that he was no longer CEO of AInc. Look in your own documents to find his sworn testimony.
I'll repost that until you give an answer.
> >He has no (public) evidence of the contrary, and you neither if you don't
> >count as evidence (and you shouldn't) Fleecy's word.
>
> Fabio, you obviously don't have a clue about these legal issues so please
> stop. Hint: A court testimony IS evidence.
:-) Sammy, a testimony is just that, a testimony. In no way a testimony can be evidence of anything, or else there wouldn't be something like "false testimony" (http://www.lectlaw.com/def/f015.htm). A testimony is no proof, hence it can't be evidence.
> Furthermore, you must be really blind if you think that the individual at hand
> *actually* thought the e-mail was genuine, even after the one who wrote it
> admitted to his practical joke.
What I think is just that you have no evidence of the contrary. So shut up.
> >Shall we count all plans that AInc failed to accomplish?
>
> Amiga Inc. is not the issue at hand here, Fabio.
That's irrelevant. You're using that argument to attack a "certain individual", as if it were an important thing to note, whilst it's not, it's just a plan that didn't get accomplished. One against the many of your beloved party. |
|
List of all comments to this article (continued) |
|
- User Menu
-
- About ANN archives
- The ANN archives is powered by #AmigaZeux. It was updated daily (news last: 22-Oct-2004; comments last: 18-May-2005).
ANN.lu was created, previously owned and maintained by Christian Kemp, www.ckemp.com.
- Contribute
- Not possible at this time!
- Search ANN archives
- Advanced search
- Hosting
- ANN.lu was hosted by Dreamhost. Sign up through this link, mention "ckemp" as referrer and he will get a 10% commission on any account you purchase.
Please show your appreciation for any past, present and future work on ANN.lu by making a contribution via PayPal.
|