[News] 4 New Filings in the Thendic Electronics, et al v. Amiga Inc Case | ANN.lu |
Posted on 21-Dec-2003 02:32 GMT by samface | 250 comments View flat View list |
There are 4 new filings in the civil docket for the Thendic Electronics, et al v. Amiga Inc case, including:
RESPONSE by Defendant Amiga Inc. (Entered: 12/19/2003)
AMENDED REPLY to Response to Motion filed by Plaintiffs (Entered: 12/16/2003)
DECLARATION of Bill Buck filed by Plaintiff Thendic Electronics Components (Entered: 12/16/2003)
ORDER by Judge Robert S Lasnik granting in part 31 Plaintiffs' Motion for Summary Judgment. (Entered: 12/19/2003)
A highlight from the latest ruling by Judge Lasnik:
Defendant's counterclaim is hereby dismissed for failure to prosecute. However, the Court declines to rule on plaintiffs' request for specific performance at this time. Plaintiffs' motion for summary judgment is renoted for 1/16/2004. Plaintiffs shall have until Monday, January 12, 2004 to submit a memorandum in response to the issues and concerns raised in this Order. Defendant, if and only if it retains counsel in the interim, may file a reply memorandum no later than 4:30 p.m. on Thursday, January 15, 2004. No extensions shall be given.
Visit the Civil Docket for the Thendic Electronics, et al v. Amiga Inc case here.
|
|
List of all comments to this article |
4 New Filings in the Thendic Electronics, et al v. Amiga Inc Case : Comment 86 of 250 | ANN.lu |
Posted by Tigger on 22-Dec-2003 07:21 GMT | In reply to Comment 85 (samface): >>>>
Furthermore, Bill McEwen also showed a letter to the court from Amiga Inc.'s former lawyer where Amiga Inc. offered to settle with Genesi. Agreeable terms or not, Genesi's claim that Amiga Inc. would be witholding their consent *without reason* is obviously not true.
>>>>
Really Samface?? Could you tell us which one of the documents contained such a letter, I read everything and didnt see such a letter in it. I would assume that the letter would be in the Bill McEwen filing, and I checked once again and did not find such a letter.
>>>>
It's all in the documents I've published, why does it seem like some individuals are deliberately ignoring this?
>>>>
Its seems like you dont understand the documents very well, and maybe dont realize that Bill McEwens document has been thrown out of court, but even without throwing out Bills document as the judge has done, McEwen has contradicted himself in his filing, which I have to think the judge is going to frown upon.
-Tig |
|
List of all comments to this article (continued) |
|
- User Menu
-
- About ANN archives
- The ANN archives is powered by #AmigaZeux. It was updated daily (news last: 22-Oct-2004; comments last: 18-May-2005).
ANN.lu was created, previously owned and maintained by Christian Kemp, www.ckemp.com.
- Contribute
- Not possible at this time!
- Search ANN archives
- Advanced search
- Hosting
- ANN.lu was hosted by Dreamhost. Sign up through this link, mention "ckemp" as referrer and he will get a 10% commission on any account you purchase.
Please show your appreciation for any past, present and future work on ANN.lu by making a contribution via PayPal.
|