[News] Thendic-Amiga Court Case - Latest Motions | ANN.lu |
Posted on 04-Mar-2004 00:05 GMT by Rich Woods | 216 comments View flat View list |
Thendic-Amiga Court Case - Latest Motions
DECLARATION of Bill Buck filed by Plaintiff Thendic Electronics Components re 49 MOTION to modify order (RS, ) (Entered: 03/03/2004)
MOTION by Plaintiff Thendic Electronics Components to modify the order granting specific performance. Noting Date 3/19/2004. (Attachments: # 1 note for motion# 2 Proposed Order)(RS, ) (Entered: 03/03/2004)
DECLARATION of Bill Buck filed by Plaintiff Thendic Electronics Components re 49
MOTION to modify order (RS, ) (Entered: 03/03/2004)
MOTION by Plaintiff Thendic Electronics Components to modify the order granting specific performance. Noting Date 3/19/2004. (Attachments: # 1
note for motion
#2 Proposed Order (RS, ) (Entered: 03/03/2004)
Main Documnet
|
|
List of all comments to this article |
Thendic-Amiga Court Case - Latest Motions : Comment 158 of 216 | ANN.lu |
Posted by Fabio Alemagna on 05-Mar-2004 14:08 GMT | In reply to Comment 130 (Jan Smite): > Are you sure? Genesi is claiming for access to ALL sources, including OS4,
> since they say it's the 'upgrade' of AmigaDE or the path for its development,
> whoever is the current developer.
They can claim whatever they want, but since AmigaInc doesn't own OS4 in the first place, they cannot give it to Genesi. Hyperion was in good faith when they signed the contract with AInc, no judge will ever make them pay for an - alledged - AInc's fault. The worst that can happen is that Hyperion won't be able to call their OS "AmigaOS".
> Since it is a derivative work from v3.1, as Don Cox says, Amiga still holds
> the IP.
They hold the IP over AOS3.1, not over whatever Hyperion wrote. Unless the contract Hyperion have with AInc explicitely states that all the workd Hyperion's employee or freelances is owned by AInc.
> If Buck asks the judge for the right to access to ALL sources, including OS4,
> and the judge grants this right, only burning the sources will prevent Buck
> from get them.
A judge cannot grant access to something which is not owned by _either_ parties in the process. If he/she does,
> > I think BB is trying to gather too much from this, and Judges are not
> > stupid...
> Agreed. Way too much. And no, they are not stupid, but given the fact that
> Amiga cannot even defend themselves, noone will refute Buck claims, and,
> again, no 'merits' will be taken into account, it will be judged by default.
> Do you know the italian song "Parole, parole"? Sing with me: "Vulture,
> vulture, vulture......"! :)
It doesn't matter if AInc can defend themselves, if something is not possible it's simply not possible. |
|
List of all comments to this article (continued) |
|
- User Menu
-
- About ANN archives
- The ANN archives is powered by #AmigaZeux. It was updated daily (news last: 22-Oct-2004; comments last: 18-May-2005).
ANN.lu was created, previously owned and maintained by Christian Kemp, www.ckemp.com.
- Contribute
- Not possible at this time!
- Search ANN archives
- Advanced search
- Hosting
- ANN.lu was hosted by Dreamhost. Sign up through this link, mention "ckemp" as referrer and he will get a 10% commission on any account you purchase.
Please show your appreciation for any past, present and future work on ANN.lu by making a contribution via PayPal.
|