26-Apr-2024 03:10 GMT.
UNDER CONSTRUCTION
[News] Next Pegasos production sold outANN.lu
Posted on 07-Jun-2002 18:19 GMT by Christian Kemp280 comments
View flat
View list
"From: Raquel Velasco and Bill Buck. We would like to announce that the next scheduled production of the Pegasos has been sold out. Boards have been set aside for friendly developers, but all others have been sold. Another production of the Pegasos will follow in July." [ Source: Email forward... - CK ]

Update: More information was posted in comment 52.

List of all comments to this article
Sorted by date, most recent at bottom
Comment 1Chris Young07-Jun-2002 16:32 GMT
Comment 2Kronos07-Jun-2002 16:39 GMT
Comment 3yoodoo07-Jun-2002 16:39 GMT
Comment 4NihilVor07-Jun-2002 16:47 GMT
Comment 5Kronos07-Jun-2002 16:50 GMT
Comment 6cheesegrate07-Jun-2002 16:53 GMT
Comment 7NihilVor07-Jun-2002 16:56 GMT
Comment 8gz07-Jun-2002 16:58 GMT
Comment 9JoBBo07-Jun-2002 17:01 GMT
Comment 10Kronos07-Jun-2002 17:02 GMT
Comment 11redrumloa07-Jun-2002 17:08 GMT
Comment 12Kronos07-Jun-2002 17:16 GMT
Comment 13Ben Hermans/Hyperion07-Jun-2002 17:20 GMT
Comment 14Ben Hermans/Hyperion07-Jun-2002 17:22 GMT
Comment 15Georg Steger07-Jun-2002 17:40 GMT
Comment 16acg07-Jun-2002 17:46 GMT
Comment 17JD07-Jun-2002 17:50 GMT
Comment 18Anonymous07-Jun-2002 18:05 GMT
Comment 19cOrpse07-Jun-2002 18:25 GMT
Comment 20AmiTroll07-Jun-2002 18:43 GMT
Comment 21Anonymous07-Jun-2002 18:47 GMT
Comment 22Leif07-Jun-2002 18:50 GMT
Comment 23Leif07-Jun-2002 18:52 GMT
Comment 24Nicolas Sallin07-Jun-2002 20:12 GMT
Comment 25Alkis Tsapanidis07-Jun-2002 20:41 GMT
Comment 26AmiTroll07-Jun-2002 21:46 GMT
Comment 27AmiTroll07-Jun-2002 22:00 GMT
Comment 28Alkis Tsapanidis07-Jun-2002 22:19 GMT
Comment 29cOrpse07-Jun-2002 23:07 GMT
Comment 30Alkis Tsapanidis07-Jun-2002 23:13 GMT
Comment 31Rob07-Jun-2002 23:15 GMT
Comment 32Alkis Tsapanidis07-Jun-2002 23:24 GMT
Comment 33Alkis Tsapanidis07-Jun-2002 23:26 GMT
Comment 34Marcus Sundman07-Jun-2002 23:27 GMT
Comment 35strobe07-Jun-2002 23:30 GMT
Comment 36Alkis Tsapanidis07-Jun-2002 23:31 GMT
Comment 37cOrpse07-Jun-2002 23:37 GMT
Comment 38cOrpse07-Jun-2002 23:41 GMT
Comment 39amigammc07-Jun-2002 23:44 GMT
Comment 40Alkis Tsapanidis07-Jun-2002 23:48 GMT
Comment 41cOrpse07-Jun-2002 23:59 GMT
Comment 42cOrpse08-Jun-2002 00:05 GMT
Comment 43Leif08-Jun-2002 00:19 GMT
Comment 44Anonymous08-Jun-2002 00:40 GMT
Comment 45Rodney McDonell08-Jun-2002 00:40 GMT
Comment 46anon08-Jun-2002 00:41 GMT
Comment 47gz08-Jun-2002 01:48 GMT
Comment 48Anonymous08-Jun-2002 02:32 GMT
Comment 49Anonymous08-Jun-2002 02:38 GMT
Comment 50sh33p08-Jun-2002 04:24 GMT
Comment 51hgm08-Jun-2002 05:24 GMT
Comment 52Anders Kjeldsen08-Jun-2002 05:37 GMT
Comment 53Raquel and Bill08-Jun-2002 05:42 GMT
Comment 54Don Cox08-Jun-2002 05:45 GMT
Comment 55Anders Kjeldsen08-Jun-2002 05:55 GMT
Comment 56Björn Hagström08-Jun-2002 06:15 GMT
Comment 57Turrican08-Jun-2002 06:31 GMT
Comment 58Bill08-Jun-2002 06:47 GMT
Comment 59Senex (Martin Heine)08-Jun-2002 06:49 GMT
Comment 60Rob08-Jun-2002 06:51 GMT
Comment 61Nicolas Sallin08-Jun-2002 06:55 GMT
Comment 62anarchic_teapot08-Jun-2002 06:57 GMT
Comment 63Raquel and Bill08-Jun-2002 07:04 GMT
Comment 64Rob08-Jun-2002 07:06 GMT
Comment 65Rob08-Jun-2002 07:08 GMT
Comment 66Bill08-Jun-2002 07:10 GMT
Comment 67Björn Hagström08-Jun-2002 07:15 GMT
Comment 68Raquel and Bill08-Jun-2002 07:21 GMT
Comment 69Kronos08-Jun-2002 07:22 GMT
Comment 70Nicolas Sallin08-Jun-2002 07:23 GMT
Comment 71Ben Hermans/Hyperion08-Jun-2002 07:36 GMT
Comment 72Rob08-Jun-2002 07:36 GMT
Comment 73Rob08-Jun-2002 07:46 GMT
Comment 74Bill08-Jun-2002 07:51 GMT
Comment 75Rob08-Jun-2002 07:53 GMT
Comment 76Bill08-Jun-2002 08:01 GMT
Comment 77Simon08-Jun-2002 08:23 GMT
Comment 78anarchic_teapot08-Jun-2002 08:32 GMT
Comment 79Bill08-Jun-2002 08:38 GMT
Comment 80Rob08-Jun-2002 08:44 GMT
Comment 81Raquel and Bill08-Jun-2002 09:00 GMT
Comment 82cOrpse08-Jun-2002 09:57 GMT
Comment 83gz08-Jun-2002 10:34 GMT
Comment 84Simon08-Jun-2002 10:44 GMT
Comment 85cOrpse08-Jun-2002 10:53 GMT
Comment 86kjetil08-Jun-2002 10:56 GMT
Comment 87cheesegrate08-Jun-2002 11:18 GMT
Comment 88anarchic_teapot08-Jun-2002 11:22 GMT
Comment 89cheesegrate08-Jun-2002 11:27 GMT
Comment 90Don Cox08-Jun-2002 11:36 GMT
Comment 91Ben Hermans/Hyperion08-Jun-2002 11:45 GMT
Comment 92cheesegrate08-Jun-2002 12:05 GMT
Comment 93cOrpse08-Jun-2002 12:08 GMT
Comment 94Bill08-Jun-2002 12:13 GMT
Comment 95Simon08-Jun-2002 12:15 GMT
Comment 96Bill08-Jun-2002 12:17 GMT
Comment 97Amifan08-Jun-2002 12:23 GMT
Comment 98Kronos08-Jun-2002 12:27 GMT
Comment 99Simon08-Jun-2002 12:27 GMT
Comment 100Simon08-Jun-2002 12:29 GMT
Comment 101Lamer08-Jun-2002 12:30 GMT
Comment 102gz08-Jun-2002 12:31 GMT
Comment 103Amifan08-Jun-2002 12:33 GMT
Comment 104cOrpse08-Jun-2002 12:33 GMT
Comment 105Bill08-Jun-2002 12:43 GMT
Comment 106JacHermans08-Jun-2002 12:45 GMT
Comment 107Simon08-Jun-2002 12:47 GMT
Comment 108Simon08-Jun-2002 12:51 GMT
Comment 109amigammc08-Jun-2002 12:52 GMT
Comment 110cOrpse08-Jun-2002 12:55 GMT
Comment 111Amifan08-Jun-2002 12:58 GMT
Comment 112Bill08-Jun-2002 13:00 GMT
Comment 113Anonymous08-Jun-2002 13:02 GMT
Comment 114bah08-Jun-2002 13:04 GMT
Comment 115Simon08-Jun-2002 13:04 GMT
Comment 116feh08-Jun-2002 13:09 GMT
Comment 117AmiTroll08-Jun-2002 13:09 GMT
Comment 118Simon08-Jun-2002 13:10 GMT
Comment 119AmiTroll08-Jun-2002 13:10 GMT
Comment 120Amifan08-Jun-2002 13:10 GMT
Comment 121cOrpse08-Jun-2002 13:11 GMT
Comment 122gz08-Jun-2002 13:17 GMT
Comment 123Bearded, smelly GNU hippy08-Jun-2002 13:17 GMT
Comment 124Simon08-Jun-2002 13:24 GMT
Comment 125Simon08-Jun-2002 13:27 GMT
Comment 126Amifan08-Jun-2002 13:27 GMT
Comment 127Bill08-Jun-2002 13:28 GMT
Comment 128Amifan08-Jun-2002 13:33 GMT
Comment 129Daniel Miller08-Jun-2002 13:40 GMT
Comment 130Amifan08-Jun-2002 13:41 GMT
Comment 131Anonymous08-Jun-2002 13:51 GMT
Comment 132Amifan08-Jun-2002 13:54 GMT
Comment 133Anonymous08-Jun-2002 13:55 GMT
Comment 134Anonymous08-Jun-2002 14:01 GMT
Comment 135AmiTroll08-Jun-2002 14:07 GMT
Comment 136cOrpse08-Jun-2002 14:09 GMT
Comment 137Mekanix08-Jun-2002 14:22 GMT
Comment 138Simon08-Jun-2002 14:27 GMT
Comment 139galja gobba, nam nam08-Jun-2002 14:40 GMT
Comment 140AmiTroll08-Jun-2002 14:41 GMT
Comment 141anonymous08-Jun-2002 15:21 GMT
Comment 142oops08-Jun-2002 15:31 GMT
Comment 143anonymous08-Jun-2002 15:33 GMT
Comment 144Anders Kjeldsen08-Jun-2002 15:56 GMT
Comment 145Bill08-Jun-2002 16:06 GMT
Comment 146anonymous08-Jun-2002 16:55 GMT
Comment 147anonymous08-Jun-2002 17:09 GMT
Comment 148Björn Hagström08-Jun-2002 17:23 GMT
Comment 149Anders Kjeldsen08-Jun-2002 17:52 GMT
Comment 150Anders Kjeldsen08-Jun-2002 17:55 GMT
Comment 151Mekanix08-Jun-2002 17:57 GMT
Comment 152anarchic_teapot08-Jun-2002 18:07 GMT
Comment 153Johan Rönnblom08-Jun-2002 18:25 GMT
Comment 154Gingerbread Man08-Jun-2002 20:08 GMT
Comment 155Björn Hagström08-Jun-2002 20:15 GMT
Comment 156anonymous09-Jun-2002 02:30 GMT
Comment 157amigammc09-Jun-2002 02:50 GMT
Comment 158Bill09-Jun-2002 03:03 GMT
Comment 159cheesegrate09-Jun-2002 03:56 GMT
Comment 160cheesegrate09-Jun-2002 04:20 GMT
Comment 161Trizt09-Jun-2002 05:39 GMT
Comment 162hgm09-Jun-2002 05:42 GMT
Comment 163Don Cox09-Jun-2002 06:12 GMT
Comment 164Don Cox09-Jun-2002 06:16 GMT
Comment 165Simpleppc09-Jun-2002 06:32 GMT
Comment 166Tbone09-Jun-2002 06:35 GMT
Comment 167cheesegrate09-Jun-2002 06:44 GMT
Comment 168TBone09-Jun-2002 06:54 GMT
Comment 169TBone09-Jun-2002 07:01 GMT
Comment 170Jürgen Lange09-Jun-2002 07:39 GMT
Comment 171Gingerbread Man09-Jun-2002 08:00 GMT
Comment 172Johan Rönnblom09-Jun-2002 08:39 GMT
Comment 173Gingerbread Man09-Jun-2002 09:13 GMT
Comment 174Björn Hagström09-Jun-2002 09:24 GMT
Comment 175cOrpse09-Jun-2002 09:26 GMT
Comment 176Don Cox09-Jun-2002 09:27 GMT
Comment 177Gingerbread Man09-Jun-2002 09:38 GMT
Comment 178Daniel Miller09-Jun-2002 09:55 GMT
Comment 179Joanna09-Jun-2002 09:55 GMT
Comment 180Christian09-Jun-2002 09:59 GMT
Comment 181Marcus Sundman09-Jun-2002 10:57 GMT
Comment 182Anonymous09-Jun-2002 11:30 GMT
Comment 183Raquel and Bill09-Jun-2002 11:50 GMT
Comment 184Tony Gore09-Jun-2002 11:54 GMT
Comment 185Bill09-Jun-2002 12:02 GMT
Comment 186Bill09-Jun-2002 12:10 GMT
Comment 187Bill09-Jun-2002 12:26 GMT
Comment 188José09-Jun-2002 12:30 GMT
Comment 189wouter09-Jun-2002 12:31 GMT
Comment 190Alkis Tsapanidis09-Jun-2002 12:36 GMT
Comment 191Alkis Tsapanidis09-Jun-2002 12:46 GMT
Comment 192Tony Gore09-Jun-2002 13:06 GMT
Comment 193Bill09-Jun-2002 13:28 GMT
Comment 194Anonymous09-Jun-2002 13:28 GMT
Comment 195amigammc09-Jun-2002 13:32 GMT
Comment 196Johan Rönnblom09-Jun-2002 13:51 GMT
Comment 197Daniel Miller09-Jun-2002 13:58 GMT
Comment 198Jürgen Lange09-Jun-2002 14:06 GMT
Comment 199Anders Kjeldsen09-Jun-2002 14:12 GMT
Comment 200anonymous09-Jun-2002 14:19 GMT
Comment 201Jürgen Lange09-Jun-2002 14:25 GMT
Comment 202Bill09-Jun-2002 14:32 GMT
Comment 203André Siegel09-Jun-2002 14:32 GMT
Comment 204cOrpse09-Jun-2002 14:32 GMT
Comment 205anonymous09-Jun-2002 14:40 GMT
Comment 206TBone09-Jun-2002 14:42 GMT
Comment 207Alkis Tsapanidis09-Jun-2002 14:44 GMT
Comment 208Bill09-Jun-2002 14:51 GMT
Comment 209Anders Kjeldsen09-Jun-2002 14:51 GMT
Comment 210Bill09-Jun-2002 15:16 GMT
Comment 211André Siegel09-Jun-2002 15:30 GMT
Comment 212André Siegel09-Jun-2002 15:35 GMT
Comment 213cOrpse09-Jun-2002 15:38 GMT
Comment 214Alkis Tsapanidis09-Jun-2002 15:49 GMT
Comment 215anonymous09-Jun-2002 16:44 GMT
Comment 216Anonymous09-Jun-2002 17:24 GMT
Comment 217Daniel Miller09-Jun-2002 17:30 GMT
Comment 218cOrpse09-Jun-2002 18:02 GMT
Comment 219André Siegel09-Jun-2002 19:12 GMT
Comment 220André Siegel09-Jun-2002 19:17 GMT
Comment 221Jürgen Lange09-Jun-2002 21:00 GMT
Comment 222Anonymous09-Jun-2002 21:07 GMT
Comment 223Anonymous09-Jun-2002 21:10 GMT
Comment 224amigammc09-Jun-2002 22:04 GMT
Comment 225André Siegel10-Jun-2002 04:14 GMT
Comment 226anarchic_teapot10-Jun-2002 08:01 GMT
Comment 227Bill10-Jun-2002 08:14 GMT
Comment 228Klaus M. (Denmark)10-Jun-2002 09:36 GMT
Comment 229Björn Hagström10-Jun-2002 10:09 GMT
Comment 230Anonymous10-Jun-2002 10:29 GMT
Comment 231Simon10-Jun-2002 12:16 GMT
Comment 232Simon10-Jun-2002 12:23 GMT
Comment 233Simon10-Jun-2002 12:29 GMT
Comment 234Simon10-Jun-2002 12:32 GMT
Comment 235Simon10-Jun-2002 12:38 GMT
Comment 236Bill Hoggett10-Jun-2002 12:55 GMT
Comment 237Anonymous10-Jun-2002 13:27 GMT
Comment 238Anonymous10-Jun-2002 14:57 GMT
Comment 239Raquel and Bill10-Jun-2002 15:59 GMT
Comment 240Darrin10-Jun-2002 21:05 GMT
Comment 241Darrin10-Jun-2002 21:35 GMT
Comment 242Björn Hagström11-Jun-2002 02:51 GMT
Comment 243Anonymous11-Jun-2002 04:35 GMT
Comment 244Daniel Miller11-Jun-2002 07:07 GMT
Comment 245Darrin11-Jun-2002 13:53 GMT
Comment 246Darrin11-Jun-2002 13:55 GMT
Next Pegasos production sold out : Comment 247 of 280ANN.lu
Posted by Anonymous on 11-Jun-2002 14:46 GMT
In reply to Comment 245 (Darrin):
> >>Your view is certainly very biased.
> I'd rather use the word "objective".
Really?
> I totally agree and that's EXACTLY the point I was trying to get across.
> Thendic simply sell the mobos... nothing else. They are the wrong people to
> whine at about OS4 not running on it.
Agreed. Thendic/Pretory sells motherboards. I don't agree they sell nothing else, as obviously they do sell various solutions (that have nothing to do with Amiga) - however, that is pretty much irrelevant here.
> However, as they are in the business of SELLING the MAXIMUM number of mobos,
> this posting in an AMiga orientated site is simply a way of CONNING Amiga
> users (and ex-Amiga users) into buying what they will think is a next
How on Earth did you come to that conclusion? Sure, they are here to market their product. So is Amiga Inc. and plenty of other companies. They have also clearly said Pegasos - for Thendic - is an eclipsis developer board. They want developers. Surprise, surprise, so does Amiga Inc. (for their AmigaDE). This is hardly what I'd call "conning" when they say it out loud. And Bill said it. In fact, it is pretty much the same thing Amiga Inc. did with AmigaDE.
If you want to use the Pegasos as an AmigaOS compatible machine, Thendic have said they will not provide the solution but someone else is free to do so (that much is clear from their messages). Nowhere did they say they would not provide any help, or that you'd be left completely on your own. They sell and support their product, the motherboard. AmigaOS compatibility is no longer in the list of their priorities since the negotiations with Amiga Inc. were inconclusive.
> once you've bought it then they're gone and any problems you'll have will be
> in the hands of bPlan and RS... god help you!!!
Oh c'mon. And you call that objective? That is extremely speculatory and highly insulting. People behind bPlan and R.S. too have brought us some great advancements throughout the Amiga history. That is far more many of us can confess to. Badmouting them like this doesn't have a place in a good debate on the issues.
>>That is just plain smart considering negotiations with Amiga Inc. failed
>(negotiations have two parties, we can't really blame either for that in this
> The main reason why negotiations work is because BOTH parties have something
> of valve to bring to the table and have the WILL to work together towards a
> COMMON GOAL. Unfortunately, MOS is a one-man-show and a closed door to
> discussions.
In this case both parties had something of value to bring to the table. bPlan had MorphOS. Amiga Inc. had the Amiga trademark. Which one you value more is up to you. They did try to find a solution, but Amiga wanted control and bPlan wanted control. Obviously both couldn't have it under a deal. Whether or not a common goal can be found is one of the objectives of a negotiation - including, of course, finding the means to get there. Always it doesn't work. In this case, it certainly did not. Blaming just bPlan for it is ridiciluos - Amiga were just as much a player in it. Why don't you attack them as well?
Personally I wouldn't attack either one. Negotiatations are about finding common ground. In this case not enough was found, obviously, and that's just the way the world works. Why should've bPlan made any more concessions than Amiga Inc.? (Or, for that matter, why should Amiga Inc. make any more concessions than bPlan?) It is a game for two. Both played. Winners and losers are still to be determined.
> No, they neatly avoided the question. ANyway, it's NOT their problem. It's
> bPlans (like I pointed out).
What are they supposed to say then? Amiga is not a priority for them. They admitted as much. With limited boards available, they are working towards their primary goal - which is the eclipsis, AFAIK, and Pegasos as a developer board for it. Also, they can't say it will run AmigaOS because they won't be able to guarantee it.
> > instead) - its not like Eyetech have been rushing to get an AmigaOne to the
> > MorphOS camp either, now have they
> Perhaps bPlan should try ORDERING one.... just like Hyperion ordered a
> Pegasos.
According to some sources here they have ordered one. Like many other developers, people are still waiting for their AmigaOnes. They have not been delivered yet even though they should've been weeks ago (early May the latest). Same goes for Pegasos. It is not yet available in numbers, it is late just like the AmigaOne. Hence (my speculation) not enough boards to justify giving one to a developer that doesn't benefit the primary market for Pegasos (eclipsis development). There are plenty of valid reasons for both parties to work this way with the limited number of boards that are out there.
> I see it as a PR game. However, I give them credit for giving an honest
> answer to the state of the mobo and MOS. They have confirmed that MOS is
> unfinished, they have confirmed that the only Pegasos boards in existanmce
> were made in a garage, they have confirmed that the next production run is
> for development only and they have confirmed that dealers/users are going to
> have to wait for a board. Their main target is INDUSTRY... so all you home
> MOS users are NOT their priority.
MOS desktop users are not their priority, that is certainly how it does seem. But then, that was bPlan's plan all along as I saw it. They always spoke of other markets, not just the Amiga market. bPlan website is not directed at Amiga users at all. Obviously they would've wanted to do more here as well, but the negotiations with Amiga Inc. failed and they decided to pretty much forget about it. Or at least that is what Bill seems to say of Thendic, I'm not sure how bPlan itself plays into all this. They have been pretty quiet.
> I think all MOS fans should buy a Pegasos... you all deserve one.
Yeah, indeed. I call that _so_ objective.
Please, why can't we debate the issues and forget the insults?
Jump...
TopPrevious commentNext commentbottom
List of all comments to this article (continued)
Comment 248Bill11-Jun-2002 14:46 GMT
Comment 249Darrin11-Jun-2002 15:13 GMT
Comment 250Bill11-Jun-2002 15:58 GMT
Comment 251André Siegel11-Jun-2002 17:45 GMT
Comment 252Anonymous11-Jun-2002 18:45 GMT
Comment 253Darrin11-Jun-2002 19:05 GMT
Comment 254Alkis Tsapanidis11-Jun-2002 20:24 GMT
Comment 255SimplePPC11-Jun-2002 22:24 GMT
Comment 256Bertrand Presles11-Jun-2002 23:03 GMT
Comment 257Darrin11-Jun-2002 23:41 GMT
Comment 258cheesegrate12-Jun-2002 00:16 GMT
Comment 259cheesegrate12-Jun-2002 00:19 GMT
Comment 260Anonymous12-Jun-2002 00:20 GMT
Comment 261cheesegrate12-Jun-2002 00:20 GMT
Comment 262Anonymous12-Jun-2002 00:21 GMT
Comment 263Samface12-Jun-2002 07:09 GMT
Comment 264Anonymous12-Jun-2002 07:39 GMT
Comment 265Bertrand Presles12-Jun-2002 09:31 GMT
Comment 266Bill12-Jun-2002 09:31 GMT
Comment 267Samface12-Jun-2002 09:33 GMT
Comment 268Bill12-Jun-2002 09:40 GMT
Comment 269Samface12-Jun-2002 09:43 GMT
Comment 270Bertrand Presles12-Jun-2002 10:13 GMT
Comment 271Alkis Tsapanidis12-Jun-2002 10:33 GMT
Comment 2723seas12-Jun-2002 11:35 GMT
Comment 273Anonymous12-Jun-2002 13:17 GMT
Comment 274Alkis Tsapanidis12-Jun-2002 13:48 GMT
Comment 275Samface15-Jun-2002 12:53 GMT
Comment 276Anonymous15-Jun-2002 13:17 GMT
Comment 277Anonymous15-Jun-2002 13:21 GMT
Comment 278Gingerbread Man16-Jun-2002 06:57 GMT
Comment 279Anonymous28-Jun-2002 13:54 GMT
Comment 280jerkyboys28-Jun-2002 13:58 GMT
Back to Top